Jump to content

User talk:STEMinfo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editing STEM info

[edit]

Editing STEM info STEMinfo (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Circumcision (disambiguation) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero-touch provisioning (January 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Raydann was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, STEMinfo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero-touch provisioning (January 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of F4 and EF4 tornadoes on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
177 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Metascience (talk) Add sources
32 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Actant (talk) Add sources
1,454 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Curriculum (talk) Add sources
15 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (talk) Add sources
114 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Science wars (talk) Add sources
99 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Home directory (talk) Add sources
274 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Madras Christian College (talk) Cleanup
143 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Theories of technology (talk) Cleanup
42 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Transition management (governance) (talk) Cleanup
42 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Engineering studies (talk) Expand
130 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA PhET Interactive Simulations (talk) Expand
84 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Glossary of archaeology (talk) Expand
251 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (talk) Unencyclopaedic
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Scientific enterprise (talk) Unencyclopaedic
329 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Master of Engineering (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,076 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Banaras Hindu University (talk) Merge
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Co-production (society) (talk) Merge
195 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Information and media literacy (talk) Merge
75 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C V. Ramgopal Rao (talk) Wikify
40 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C User innovation (talk) Wikify
303 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Knowledge economy (talk) Wikify
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Nauroti Devi (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Mathematics and science partnerships (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B TeachEngineering (talk) Orphan
129 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Shirime (talk) Stub
40 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Blackboxing (talk) Stub
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Technical change (talk) Stub
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start John Law (sociologist) (talk) Stub
15 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Steve Woolgar (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Interessement (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pornography addiction on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment, and at Talk:Eukaryote, Talk:K2-18b, Talk:History of penicillin and Talk:Purple shore crab on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Centipede on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Atlantic hurricane season on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cataract surgery on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypericum androsaemum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GAN reviewing

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo, thanks for carrying out Talk:Centipede/GA2. In the future, if you need advice feel free to ask at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations, or feel free to reach out individually. Best, CMD (talk) 01:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nerodia clarkii on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ian Heslop on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Imperobator on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Howard Florey on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero-touch provisioning has been accepted

[edit]
Zero-touch provisioning, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Karnataka (talk) 15:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Climate change and birds on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Basic Medicine on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2011 Tarlay earthquake on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rodrigues night heron on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, STEMinfo. Thank you for your work on Zero-touch provisioning. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thanks! STEMinfo (talk) 07:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1886 eruption of Mount Tarawera on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kaikaifilu on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Protist on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request

[edit]

Thank you for implementing the changes with the AliveCor article. If it's not too much trouble, could I ask you to help with a few more edit requests?

1) I found a good source for the headcount in the infobox:

|num_employees = 150<ref>https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/fa7pC5ygLkHKmAYIzEkIZ</ref>

2) The company name is officially stylized as AliveCor, per this legal filing [[1] Can you rename the article?
3) I uploaded two photos to Commons showing the KardiaMobile 6L and the KardiaMobile Card. Can you add them to the product section?

[[File:KardiaMobile_6L.jpg|thumb|KardiaMobile 6L six lead EKG device]]
[[File:File:KardiaMobile_Card.jpgg|thumb|KardiaMobile Card EKG monitor]]

Thanks for your help. Teles24 (talk) 12:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Teles:  Done STEMinfo (talk) 20:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cupping therapy on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Glyphosate on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@STEMinfo after your contribution another involved editor delisted the RfC stating that my RfC text was "misleading". Only you and another editor that commented on the RfC are uninvolved in the previous dispute so I'm asking for both to comment on the RfC to have a fresh perspective. Would you agree that the RfC is misleading or even "disruptive" and needs to be delisted? This is my first RfC so would appreciate the feedback if you have the time as no new editors will find it now. Thanks a lot. {{u|Gtoffoletto}}talk 14:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Selective androgen receptor modulator on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Amargatitanis on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ameerega munduruku on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ashy flycatcher on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16-SEP-2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:NerdWallet. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you.  Spintendo  21:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spintendo: I'm not sure which edit you're talking about. Can you link to the diff? I've been updating the status of the edit request responses that I completed after they were previously rejected for being too vague or incomplete. Is that not allowed? STEMinfo (talk) 20:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Spintendo: I see what you are referring to. I only made one edit to the talk page, to update the COI edit response. How should I update another editor's responses in the future? Should I strike them instead? STEMinfo (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to WP:REDACT, you should only be altering your previous talk page posts. The talk page posts of others should never be altered. Regards  Spintendo  01:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create drafts meant for userspace in article space

[edit]

Both User:STEMinfo/COI edit requests for novices and User:STEMinfo/COI edit requests for novices 2 have now been moved to your userspace. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @AirshipJungleman29: I thought I was in user space and was mid-editing when you notified me. I prodded the old page. STEMinfo (talk) 23:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

STEMinfo/COI edit requests for novices

[edit]

Hello. Please don't keep creating this page in the main article space. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 23:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Wikishovel: I thought I was in user space and was mid-editing when I was notified. I prodded the old page. STEMinfo (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Oak on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pulchrocladia retipora on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Handicap principle on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Elke Mackenzie on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gallup data for articles

[edit]

Hello, I represent Gallup, Inc. on Wikipedia, and as part of that work I've been asked to gauge editor interest in using Gallup data graphs in articles. To start, Gallup has donated several graphs to Wikimedia Commons, and I started a conversation on Talk:Employee engagement about some graphs that might be relevant to that article. Since you've edited the Gallup article, and given your general editing interests, I thought you might be interested in the discussion. Gallup's goal is to be a resource to Wikipedia editors by making their data more accessible and easier to include in articles. Cheers! BINK Robin (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Placidium arboreum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hurricane Dora (2023) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:November 2013 North American storm complex on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teleperformance

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo, I was hoping you might look at my request at Talk:Teleperformance#Additional content request given your interest in an earlier suggestion. Thank you for your help. ~~~~ ANishina (talk) 21:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Entropy on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypericum hircinum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Computational chemistry on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Insect on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Boaler

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo. A few weeks ago I posted an edit request at Talk:Jo_Boaler#'Early_career'_and_'Return_to_Stanford'_sections. You asked me a question about the first bullet point, and I recently posted my answer. This is a gentle request for you to take a look at my answer and the rest of the edit request, and implement the suggested edits if you feel they are appropriate. Thanks so much, MeanderingWalrus (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amplify (company)

[edit]

Hi, STEMinfo. Amplify (company), a curriculum and assessment company, is in need of an update. I posted some suggestions on the Talk page and haven't gotten any input. I noticed that you recently answered some of the requests in the queue and was wondering if you may be able to take a look at mine. I'm interested in hearing any feedback you may have and would appreciate assistance implementing the edits. Thank you very much, Mollyatamplify (talk) 14:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypericum × inodorum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tropical Storm Dolores (2021) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Modafinil on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lecideaceae on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Snowy albatross on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dissoderma odoratum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gustaf Einar Du Rietz on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2002 Van Wert–Roselms tornado on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft review request

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo - I saw you helped rewrite Darius Jones (saxophonist), and was wondering if you'd be kind enough to review a draft I wrote in my sandbox for a company called VML. It's an agency formed when two agencies which already have articles VMLY&R and Wunderman Thompson merged. I have a conflict of interest and don't want to break any editing rules. I'm a little confused by the reference formatting but I tried to match the tone and content I see in other agency articles. Do you think it would be approved if I submitted it? Uncle Shep (talk) 21:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Shep: Looks OK for a first pass, but there are a couple of minor things I see right away that can be fixed. I'll take a deeper look this weekend. STEMinfo (talk) 22:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks STEMinfo Uncle Shep (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Uncle Shep: I moved your draft to mainspace. VML (agency) The content and the sources were pretty good, but I found a better way to show the history of the earlier agencies. I also added some sources that were missing. You can see in the version history what I did. Congratulations - you can now say your wrote an article. STEMinfo (talk) 23:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks for your help @STEMinfo:173.66.204.119 (talk) 17:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for your help with VML (agency). With a conflict of interest, am I at least allowed to edit the predecessor articles to link to the new article, so it's not an orphan? Including the VML (disambiguation) page? I also noticed that VML redirects to Vector Markup Language, an obsolete file format discontinued years ago. Who decides which article the bare letters redirect to? Also, am I allowed to add a logo? Thanks for your help. Uncle Shep (talk) 12:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Uncle Shep: I linked the older agencies to your new article, added a logo, and updated the disambiguation page. I'm not sure that searches for VML can go to your article versus the VML disambiguation page. I'll have to do a little research. STEMinfo (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks STEMinfo Uncle Shep (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suitability of VML (agency) for a standalone article

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo, I see you reviewed the publication of VML as a standalone article. I've had a quick look at the sources as par of the new pages review process, both already cited and not yet in the article, and they largely seemed like what we consider routine business announcements, meaning they do not normally contribute to what we require to write a standalone article. Even the Wall Street Journal article seemed to fall short of that mark. It is also not recommended to base substantial portions of an article off primary sources, non-independent sources, or both, which the aforementioned routine coverage often also falls into.

I would normally suggest a merger of the article, in this case, most likely into VMLY&R § VML, but before I implement such a merge, I'd like to ask if either you or Uncle Shep had any questions or objections about the process, or alternate merge targets. Alpha3031 (tc) 11:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha3031: Thanks for the heads up. I also considered merging when I saw this request, but since the new company looks like a merger of equals, that didn't make sense. The component companies themselves were created by mergers, and those articles are structured the same way this one is. This source says that as a result of this merger, VML is now the world's largest creative agency, so the notability threshold is met. I thought a primary source was something controlled by the subject? All the sources Uncle Shep used seem to be secondary news sources. If you think the sourcing is weak, maybe tag for refimprove? Should I put this comment in the merge discussion? STEMinfo (talk) 00:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again STEMinfo. For companies and organisations, the "notability"* criteria is strictly based on the depth of coverage in eligible sources (WP:ORGCRIT). There's no real list of additional criteria like we have for most of the other subjects in the {{Notability sidebar}} on the Wikipedia:Notability page (such as the well-known and significant award or honor we'd use for any biography).
And don't worry, the idea that a primary source is one controlled by the subject is a common one, and the distinction is a very technical point of policy that is very rare to come across, but they are different. We have an essay, Wikipedia:Party and person, about it, but the gist of it is that a secondary source, as defined in our Wikipedia:No original research policy, are required to have analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Simple statements of fact are never secondary, whereas, say, an researcher publishing a review article featuring their own work, or hell, even the company publishing analysis of their financial results, would be secondary but not independent. In this case, refs 1, 2 and 12 have some of what we'd consider secondary content.
Of course, many of the sources for VML (agency) would also fail the independence test for organisations, WP:ORGIND, which requires both functional independence (that the author and publication are unaffiliated) and intellectual independence (that the content is not directly derived from what is provided by interested parties). Most interviews and announcements would fail the second half of that test. Finally, coverage that companies routinely receive as part of ordinary business operations (WP:CORPROUTINE) is typically considered trivial coverage and would fail the first S in WP:SIRS ("Significant coverage"). Hope this clarifies the concerns.
* I've put it in quotes because "notability" on Wikipedia is jargon that IMO doesn't really match the common meaning of the term. Alpha3031 (tc) 14:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alpha3031: Thanks for the detailed clarification. I read the WP:P&P essay and from the info there, it seems to indicate that all the sources in the article qualify as tertiary sources. They appear to be written by trade publications that are distinct from the subject. I looked at VML's history and still don't think a merge makes sense. I'll add a comment to your merge discussion. STEMinfo (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request

[edit]

Hi @STEMinfo, I am a COI editor who uploaded a request on Labaton Sucharow back in early February. While looking at requests others had made so I could put mine together, I saw you link to your User:STEMinfo/COI edit requests for novices and thought I'd use your formatting recommendations to indicate the changes I was looking to make. Would you mind seeing if I have followed your advice correctly and maybe reviewing the request? I would also be happy to provide any feedback as I believe your guide is a work in progress rather than official guidance. The Comfiest (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Comfiest: Glad my guidance helped. I'll take a look this week. STEMinfo (talk) 23:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More for Amplify educational services

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo, thank you again for your previous work on the Amplify article. I recently put up a new edit request on the Talk page with additional suggested updates and improvements for the article. I would appreciate if you would review it and assist with the edits. Thank you very much, Mollyatamplify (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo -- I am Noam Cohen (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Noam_Cohen), a journalist who writes frequently about Wikipedia and how it works. I've noticed that you play a crucial role in translating suggestions from editors with COI to edits to articles. Could we arrange a time to speak, either via email or over the phone? I see that, for good reason, you don't have a way of being emailed. :) I'm noamstuart at gmail.com if you want to drop me a line. Looking forward to it, Chomsky1 (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chomsky1: - I thought I was set up with email but apparently wasn't. It should be now, and I also emailed you. Happy to answer any questions you might have. I'm surprised with all the attention that the Noam Cohen article has gotten that nobody else realized that the part about Noam being a Wikipedia editor is poorly sourced. One source is Noam saying he's an editor in an article he wrote, and the other is a link to press articles Noam wrote. Neither proves that the real Noam is actually a Wikipedia editor, and I'm also going on good faith that you are really him. ;-) STEMinfo (talk) 23:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Heptamegacanthus on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Organism on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1870 Atlantic hurricane season on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypericum aciferum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth C. Griffin updates

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo, thank you for your latest additions to Kenneth C. Griffin's article. I'm reaching out to make sure you saw the most recent request to further improve the page. Thank you!Cduffymul (talk) 18:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from January

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo, I hope you're well! I submitted a request to CVC Capital Partners which is now among the oldest in the backlog for edit requests made by users with a conflict of interest. I saw that you have participated in the discussion of some of the other requests from January and wondered if you might kindly consider having a look at the request I have submitted? Huge thanks for the work you are already doing to tackle this backlog. Selixomen (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Katzenberg request

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo, in the past you had reviewed some of my requests on the Jeffrey Katzenberg article. I have another open request that might be of interest. Would you be willing to take a look? I'd really appreciate it. Cheers! BINK Robin (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1895 Atlantic hurricane season on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ove Almborn on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Reed Timmer on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Evarcha praeclara on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Boaler recent edits

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo. This is a gentle nudge for you to please return to Talk:Jo Boaler#Remove recent inappropriate edits where we are in the middle of a discussion about some recent edits made to this page that I believe are not strictly NPOV. I appreciate your input and your help. Thanks again. MeanderingWalrusthesecond (talk) 13:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reaching out about Global Strategy Group requests

[edit]

Hello there! I'm Aaron, an employee at the political consulting and polling firm Global Strategy Group. You've worked with my colleague User:ES at Global Strategy Group previously. I'm filling in for her while she's out of office for a bit. Would you have any interest in taking a look at one or both of the active edit requests on the GSG Talk page? The first one concerns the addition of a new Advocacy campaigns section, and the second is about some edits we would like to make to the existing Amazon subsection. I know Wikipedia is a community of volunteer editors, so I don't want to make onerous demands on your time, but since you've helped out before, I thought I would at least check. I'll link to both requests here: Advocacy campaigns and Amazon.

The Amazon one is simpler and should take less time to review. I would also appreciate, if you don't want to take this on, any advice you might have about finding interested editors. The Advocacy section draft in particular has been sitting for quite a while, and I'm not sure what to do about it.

Thanks, Aaron for GSG (talk) 20:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avia Solutions Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAS. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pharos (crater) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Umbilicaria torrefacta on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2009 Fiordland earthquake on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Biological determinism on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Issuu

[edit]

Hi @STEMinfo! I wanted to check back and see if you had any additional thoughts, in the affirmative or negative, about my proposed changes to the Issuu article. I created a draft to better display the suggested changes. You can view it here: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Issuu_Edits_-_Proposed

Thanks for the help! SBCornelius (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed on talk page. STEMinfo (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Avia Solutions Group

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo. I hope all is well. I recently posted an edit request at Talk:Avia Solutions Group#History update. Since you helped out not too long ago on this page, I am hoping you won't mind helping again. It's much appreciated. ~~~~ Agne for ASG (talk) 15:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting review of draft

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo - I noticed you've helped connected editors in the past with various edit requests. I wrote a draft for a company I work with called SoLo Funds. The draft is in my sandbox: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Knowledgeseeker209871/sandbox. Can you take a look at the draft, and let me know if you think it will be approved? I modeled it after the Insureon article, so hopefully it's okay. Thank you for your time. Knowledgeseeker209871 (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Knowledgeseeker209871: I took the liberty to filling in and combining the bare references using the reFill tool. I should have some time to take a look at your draft tomorrow. STEMinfo (talk) 23:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Knowledgeseeker209871: I reviewed your draft. I Googled SoLo to see if there was anything else that could be added. I saw a lot of recent coverage about regulatory issues, which I added. I also added some user statistics to balance things out, and changed the CNN mention to show that it was actually CNN Underscored editors that gave the review, not the main CNN newsroom. I moved your draft to mainspace where it will be reviewed by the new page patrollers. The page history will show that you are the article's creator. Any further discussion should be on the article's talk page. For any additional edit requests, please see Wikipedia:Simple conflict of interest edit request. Thanks for your contribution. STEMinfo (talk) 20:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help with bio

[edit]

Sir - I hope you are having a great day. Like the others above, I’m grateful for your assistance helping with articles. I work for a businessman named Raj Bhathal, who founded a large swimwear company and is now on the ownership team of the Sacramento Kings basketball team. I think he is notable enough for an article, but I was hoping you might confirm for me before I submit it. The draft can be found here: User:RastaPete2000/sandbox/Raj Bhathal. Many thanks! RastaPete2000 (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RastaPete2000: I'll take a look. I just finished another review so it may be a while. STEMinfo (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RastaPete2000: You did a pretty good job. I filled in the refs and fixed a ref error, and moved your draft to mainspace. Page patrollers will review this and determine if he's notable enough. The only thing that was confusing is that there's no undergraduate degree listed in your draft. There are two sources that say he went to two different colleges for his undergraduate degree. Can you clarify which is right? South Dakota School of Mines or Black Hills State University. STEMinfo (talk) 23:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karl Lagerfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tropical Storm Axel (1992), Talk:Terbium, Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017) and Talk:Functional dyspepsia on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tumor necrosis factor on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vavilovian mimicry on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Chanthu (2010) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review help

[edit]

Hi STEMinfo. I noticed you've been very generous with your time to help with connected edit requests. I'm trying to publish an article about the venture capitalist Ed Sim, and accidentally published a stub for review before I was done. The stub was quickly rejected, but now that it's finished, I'd like to resubmit it. Can you see if there are any problems? Thanks for your help. NYC2032 (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NYC2032: I'll take a look and see how it looks. STEMinfo (talk) 21:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@NYC2032: In the future, it would be helpful if you included the link to your draft. I found it in your contribution history but a link is better. I reviewed the draft and changed a few things to match the sources, such as dates and names. If any sources have incorrect information, you can always try to contact the writer of the source to have them fix it, but a core tenet of Wikipedia is that everything must be sourced. I capitalized Boldstart Ventures, since common usage is preferred, and I don't see any of the sources making the name lower case. I also removed some details that were unsourced and info that seemed a bit out of place for an encyclopedia bio. You can see what I did in the revision history [2]. I'm not familiar with notability standards for investors, and looked for more sources, but it seems you've included Sim's most visible coverage. You can click the blue resubmit button to submit the article now and someone will review it and let you know if it's accepted. If not, you can keep on working on it and let me know if you'd like another review. Good luck. STEMinfo (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks
NYC2032 (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cirsium greimleri on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Ruth (1991) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fred Binka on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Enchylium polycarpon on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Insteon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Powerline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tuner (radio) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Standard-winged nightjar on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Standard-winged nightjar on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pablo Busch on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Karaka (tree) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Edit requests

[edit]

Encoded  Talk 💬 08:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Encoded: Thanks for the invite. I joined and posted my draft essay with some editing tips that can hopefully be used by the project. STEMinfo (talk) 23:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI edit requests

[edit]

Hi, this is just a brief courtesy note...

If when looking at a COI edit request you see that several days previously another editor pointed out to the requesting editor that the sourcing was very bad, the correct response is is to wait for the requesting editor to respond with better quality sources.

The correct response is not to implement the changes anyway just to get the request off the backlog, installing sources which have been observed to be very bad.

Please deal with COI edit requests with less haste and have some respect for due process. There is no hurry here, no race, and no awards for who clears the most cases off the backlog. If cases have to wait in the backlog while requesting editors locate better sources, that is not causing anybody any problem at all. If a month or two later the requesting editor hasn't responded with better sources then the request can be closed down.

Copying in Encoded for a third opinion here. The case in point was Kevin Hartz.

Regards, Axad12 (talk) 07:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academic journals) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Ampil (2024) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1991 Andover tornado and Talk:1974 Tanner tornadoes on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:James Kirkham Ramsbottom on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following up about Grammarly

[edit]

Hey there! I'm following up on your interest in reviewing a Grammarly Inc. section for the Grammarly article. Last week, I posted a section draft and accompanying infobox on the company article's Talk page. You can view that post by following this link. No rush to review. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of it. Thanks! AZH for Grammarly (talk) 22:56, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]