User talk:SR Alamgir Khan

SR Alamgir Khan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SR Alamgir Khan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits to Tahsan Rahman Khan

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Tahsan Rahman Khan article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ―Susmuffin ^Talk 20:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SAFF U15 Attendance stats

Can you please provide your source at the article talk page, that where did you get the "ATTENDANCE" stats and referee stats. For now I have kept those stats and info, but if you fail to mention any source I have to remove them from the article. So please do reply. Dey subrata (talk) 11:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I got those details from All India Football Federation.So please must not move it.

August 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 SAFF U-15 Championship. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️ (She/her) (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangladesh national football team results (2010s), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhang Lei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SR Alamgir Khan/Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SR Alamgir Khan/Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bangladesh national under-17 football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Army Stadium, Ma Long, Bishan and Gao Di

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangladesh national under-23 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convesation

Hello, you droped a message with your watspp no. Please never do that. Its against wiki policies. Anways I don't use watsapp, secondly, if you want to have words you can have it on email. But I would like to know about the topic, is it the football related topic??. Dey subrata (talk) 20:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bangla Wikipedia

বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ায় অবদান রেখে বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়াকে সাহায্য করার অনুরোধ জানাই। ইংরেজি উইকিতে যেমন অন্য দেশের লোক এসে সাহায্য করে, বাংলা উইকিতে এমনটা হবে না। আমরা বাঙালিরা যদি নিজেদের মাতৃভাষার উইকি এড়িয়ে চলি তবে বাংলা উইকির উন্নতি হবে না। তাই সকল বাঙালি উইকিপিডিয়ানের সাহায্য কামনা করি। আপনি ফুটবল নিয়ে ভালোবাসের দেখেছি। আপনি ফুটবল নিবন্ধ বিভিন্ন নিবন্ধ বাংলায় অনুবাদ করে তৈরি করে সাহায্য করতে পারেন। শুভেচ্ছান্তে --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How can I vote?Explain me as soon as possible.

False claims of creating Qatar T10 League page

Hi, I noticed you have mentioned on your user page that you have created Qatar T10 League page, when in reality you have only added some information on the page. The page has been created by me. I request you to immediately remove this claim from your user page, and not make such false claims in future since any user's contributions can easily be verified. Jacopo.Mor (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help, but you have clearly mentioned on your user page under the "Articles I have created" section that you created the page and not just edited it. Jacopo.Mor (talk) 06:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Qatar T10 League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imran Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About Club seaso.

I will tr. P.H.TARU (talk) 14:29, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

try P.H.TARU (talk) 14:29, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Qatar T10 League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Joseph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Bangladesh Women's Football League moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 Bangladesh Women's Football League, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Women's Football League moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bangladesh Women's Football League, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

সাহায্য করুন

ভাইয়া, কষ্ট করে বাংলা উইকিকে একটু সাহায্য করতে পারবেন? --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Your recent editing history at 2019 Sheikh Kamal International Club Cup shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You left no other choice for me. Please don't add flagicon with the host country and never link country. Visit WP:FOOTY, MOS:OVERLINK, WP:MOSICON, MOS:INFOBOX to know rules and policies of wikipedia first. Dey subrata (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as User talk:The Lord of Math for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message; contribs) 09:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 AFC Cup qualifying play-offs, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:LIVESCORES. Flix11 (talk) 14:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bashundhara kings women squad

First GK,then DF,then MF and last FW P.H.TARU (talk) 12:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change it now,change when jersey number will given P.H.TARU (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Dhaka Second Division Football League moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 Dhaka Second Division Football League, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 20:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2019–20 Bangladesh Championship League

Hello, SR Alamgir Khan,

Thank you for creating 2019–20 Bangladesh Championship League.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

More prose/sources/categories would be good improvements for the page, and I appreciate your contribution!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 19:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Asian 10,000 Challenge

Hello SR Alamgir Khan. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the participants.

If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:

{{subst:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge Invite (1)|~~~~}}

Thanks,
Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangladesh women's national cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nigar Sultana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019-20 Mohammedan Sporting Club (Dhaka) Season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro Henrique (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2019-20 Sheikh Jamal Dhanmondi Club season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gopalganj

2019–20 Bashundhara Kings season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season

Hello, SR Alamgir Khan

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Govvy and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, 2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Govvy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Govvy (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 20:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Russel KC

Only football clubs that play in fully professional leagues can qualify for season pages, that list is at Fully professional leagues. The Bangladesh Premier League is not fully professional and none of the clubs in it should have season pages per the policy of WP:NSEASONS. You really should work on improving Sheikh Russel KC that page is very poor quality. Govvy (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So Sir except Sheikh Russel KC there are 6 clubs pages are still in Wikipedia 2019-20 season also the clubs from Bangladesh.Why those club are not get same notice from Wikipedia?

umm, there are over 6 million pages on wikipedia, don't expect me to know everyone!! Govvy (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro Henrique (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019-20 Sheikh Russel KC season. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fenix down (talk) 17:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir Why I am blocked.What did I done.I would like yo edit but but I do not know what wrong with my account.Can someone help me to open?

Hi Sir I do not have may accounts.Its use Wifi network also hotpots.I think someone same wifi network use Wikipedia thats why problem.Please unblocked me as soon as possible?

Your draft article, User:SR Alamgir Khan/Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result

Hello, SR Alamgir Khan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bangladesh women's national under-17 team result".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Hi Sir I would like to request you thats I don't have multiple ids.I do not know who use my network and the browse wikipedia.My one and only account SR Alamgir Khan.And I want you unblock me as soon as possible. Thanks you sir.

@Bbb23: Si how long should I have wait to get back my account?Please let me know? SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:I do know I was banned for sock puppetry. Everybody who can view my profile knows about its history. However, after this happened, I had asked on this same platform about what can be done to resolve this issue, at that time the relevant admins said that if I was to wait for 6 months and do not show any bad behaviour then the matter can be looked into. Please have a look into the issue. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Hi Sir I would like to say I don't have multicple accounts of Wikipedia.My one and only id is SR Alamgir Khan.So please block others accounts that you suspect.Plz unblock me as soon as you can. Thanks.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SR Alamgir Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi sir Bbb23 would like to say I don't have multicple accounts of Wikipedia.My one and only id is SR Alamgir Khan.So please block others accounts that you suspect.Plz unblock me as soon as you can.I need to use my id.Thanks sir

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning there is technical evidence to support it. You will have to give a plausible explanation as to why the evidence(to which even administrators like me are not privy) indicates that you are using multiple accounts if you are not. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SR Alamgir Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I think there is some kind of confusion with the indefinite block which I got.I do have multiple ids in SR Alamgir Khan, Ayraa Tehreem Khan and Md Alamgir Khan but one of these ids were made by me after I got block from the Wikipedia admins.I am sorry I don't know many rules and regulations of wikipedia and thus didn't know that making multiple ids is not allowed here.I would be very hopeful if you can deactivate my others two ids (one of which I had made after I got block on the other two ids) and just active the id SR Alamgir Khan, as this was my main id and I have done a ton of editing using this id.If such a scenario is not possible, then please help with any alternative by which I can recover the id SR Alamgir Khan.I am very sorry if it created any issues, it just I don't know much about Wikipedia policies, also I promise not to make any new ids, now that I know that this kind of act is somewhat prohibited on Wikipedia. Thanks sir.

Decline reason:

So your previous appeal was a lie, and you have been deliberately evading the block? That pretty much reduces the chance of an unblock to zero. Your only possible route back to editing at this point is the standard offer. Note also that you are perilously close to being banned altogether under the three strike rule - any further block evasion in the next six months will mean that a full community discussion will be required to all ow you to return to editing. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, before this latest unblock request, you lied. In addition, you also created another account after you were blocked for socking, although you haven't edited with it (it's now blocked). And, despite your lies, you're expecting us to believe that you will behave from now on? I don't think so.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Is there any chance or way through which I can make you believe me?I personally feel sorry for what I did, also I created third id only because I was confused of how I would communicate in these Wikipedia policies.Why would I tell you guys about the third id (the one I made after I got the blocks on the orginal ids), it's only because I wanted to tell you about all the information, so that at a later point of time it would not be like "What else are you hiding?" Please if there is any way by which you can believe me then I am ready to execute that, obviously if that kind of thing can be done.Plus I guess, if I am caught again making a new Id then guys would know right, I think that that should be the time when you should ban me indefinitely, not now.

@Bbb23: Hi sir Good morning.I am still waiting from you a hopefull response about my blocking of Wikipedia account.Can you make a immediate solution for me?I would like to edit.There is many article I have to done. Thanks sir.God bless you.

@Yunshui: Hi sir so I don't get a final chance to get back my account.I am very sad about my id.I need to edit Wikipedia community.Seriously I missing my edit in wikipedia.Please think about me and give a chance.I will be honest in future. Thanks.

Draft:2019 Bangladesh Women's Football League concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2019 Bangladesh Women's Football League, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Hi sir how are you?I would like to know how many days should I wait to get back my account.Can you inform me about expire date? Thanks.

Talk

Hi SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2019 Bangladesh Women's Football League

Hello, SR Alamgir Khan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019 Bangladesh Women's Football League".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@UnitedStatesian: Hi there I cannot edit Bangladesh Womens Football League 2020.I am blocked for 6 month.Now I am finished only 3 month.So I have to wait until 30th September. Thanks.

@Bbb23: Hi there boss I am would like to know how many days should I wait to get back my Wikipedia account.Please inform me as soon as possible.I am eagerly waiting to edit in Wikipedia. Thank you sir.

@Yunshui: Hi sir How are you?I would like to know how many days left to return back my account?Since marche I blocked to editing in Wikipedia.

Hi @331dot: How are you sir.Since I am 24th March blocked of editing.I would like to know how many days should I wait to edit in Wikipedia.I missing my work in Wikipedia.Please reduce my ban as soon as possoble. Thanks you boss.

None

Hi.. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 15:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SR Alamgir Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I was blocked by the admins in late March due to multiple id abuse.At that time I was a bit confused about whole situation, result of which caused me to unintentionally write contradictory statements in my successive unblock requests.The result of which was quite disastrous to me as the admins raised questions on the credibility of my statements.After asking any possible solution for getting my id unblocked, one of the admins suggested that if I do wait for 6 months and appeal for another unblock request.I can assure you that I would not make multiple ids now, I was unaware of such a policy at that time & thus made those ids.Also, can you please provide me a link for what not to do on Wikipedia in terms of edit policy so that I do not get in such a position in future.Please, do tell about what can possibly done about my unblock request. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Your inability to determine when six months have passed means we probably should never unblock you, and certainly won't unblock you now. Come on, now. Yamla (talk) 20:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I do understand that the 6 months ban has not ended and thus I have mentioned it in my unblock request.Please tell what are the options by which the ban time can get reduce?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SR Alamgir Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. Sir so when should I appeal again to unblock of my account?Thanks.

Decline reason:

See below. MER-C 16:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are clearly just trolling at this point, I have helped you out. I have protected this page from all further non-admin edits for a period of six months. Once your current unblock request is declined, this will prevent you from posting any more abusive unblock requests until 2021-02-03. At that point, you will need to address the reasons that lead to your original block and the serious WP:CIR concerns you have demonstrated here. --Yamla (talk) 11:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User is now banned under WP:3X. No administrator is free to lift the block uniliterally. --Yamla (talk) 23:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SR Alamgir Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello everyone. It has been 6 months since I was blocked indefinitely. During the time of the block I was asked to wait for 6 months and not behave in any improper manner, and so I have had 0 interactions of any kind. Can I get unblocked now, now that the time has been served. I also promise that just like the last 6 months, I would not get into any similar problems. If I was to get in any problem then you can treat this as my last chance, after which you can treat me and my id to become completely ineligible to come back. Help would be very appreciated. Thanks. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You claim that in the last six months, you have not improperly edited Wikipedia, but as Yamla stated below, this is not true. Because over the past year you have persistently failed to be forthcoming about your misuse of multiple accounts on Wikipedia, I will be revoking your access to this talk page. Mz7 (talk) 06:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Likely sockpuppetry in late February, as Moenierah. Note also this user is banned, not blocked. No admin is free to unilaterally lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I do know I was banned for sock puppetry. Everybody who can view my profile knows about its history. However, after this happened, I had asked on this same platform about what can be done to resolve this issue, at that time the relevant admins said that if I was to wait for 6 months and do not show any bad behaviour then the matter can be looked into. Please have a look into the issue. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have not yet gone one month without sockpuppetry. Once you go six months, you'll need to follow the instructions at WP:UNBAN. --Yamla (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the user should follow anything anymore. It is now obvious the user can never be trusted, as they are demonstrably a serial liar ("During the time of the block ... I have had 0 interactions of any kind"), repeatedly keeps cheating even after promising they would not do it again, and thus should stay banned definitively, for good. Talk page acces should be revoked, too—J. M. (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for lift ban

@Mz7: Hi sir how are you? I am asking to investigate my IP, Yamla sir said I have used by the my account multiple ids in late February 2021. Please sir check it. Since 7 months I didn't edit anything with my IP. Thanks. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 20:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the user is lying again with the "7 months", as they have posted a similar question as one of their many sock puppets on 25 October 2020, which was definitely less than 7 months ago. Again, their chances of ever being unblocked should officially drop to zero.—J. M. (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for next step

@J. M.:So what can be done now so as to get my id back. I am asking this because if I was to make anymore unblock requests then I would certainly get into the ‘bad user’ radar. Is there something which can be though about? Thanks sir. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 04:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for next step

@Yunshui:So what can be done now so as to get my id back. I am asking this because if I was to make anymore unblock requests then I would certainly get into the ‘bad user’ radar. Is there something which can be though about? Thanks sir. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 12:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You had over 10 other accounts, and what would easily be said is untrustworthy behaviour. I don't think it's going to happen. Govvy (talk) 13:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Govvy: Boss I plea for a last chance. I promise of my Lord I will never do anything wrong that's against Wikipedia rules and regulations. Kindly help me and I beging to you pardon. Thanks. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 13:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can only suggest a WP:CLEANSLATE. You have to officially retire this account and not use it. But one mistake, and it's effectively jail for life. Govvy (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CLEANSLATE is not available to this user (as they are banned), and would substantially count against them when they are caught. The most likely path forward is to go six months with zero edits on this project, then follow the procedure outlined in WP:UNBAN and WP:SO. --Yamla (talk) 13:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't he at least have to declare this account retired first? Govvy (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

template:retired may not be used "if you have been blocked indefinitely." WP:CLEANSTART is not available to "Any user who has active bans, blocks or sanctions imposed". --Yamla (talk) 14:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No edit next 6 months

@Yamla: Hi sir I have decided that next 6 months I will not any edit with others accounts. Truly I don't have recently any accounts except this one. So I would like to use this account after 6 months. After 6 months you help me sir. Thanks God bless you. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 14:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be permitted to lift the block. You can follow the procedure outlined in WP:UNBAN and try to obtain community consensus to lift your ban. --Yamla (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Want to know

@Yamla: So sir I have to wait 6 months? SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Stop pinging me. I will not respond further. We've given you the information you seek, over and over and over and over and over again. All you are doing is demonstrating, very clearly, that it would be a bad idea to unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You fucken guys blocked me thats why I using many accounts and I will continue. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SR Alamgir Khan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:08, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You people never unblock me I know it very well. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 10:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the evidence and the large number of additional sock puppets created in the last couple of weeks and months, despite all the comments here, I think it is now absolutely clear that this is a lifelong ban that can never be lifted under any circumstances. No user or administrator should even reply to the person anymore, and any suspected sock puppets should be immediately reported to SPI (the user just said they will continue creating new accounts). To Yamla or Oshwah: This is why their talk page access should be revoked, too.—J. M. (talk) 11:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

How are you? SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about my account. Why I still block. Its been long time make plan for me? SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 12:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been violating WP:SOCK so much that you are banned. This has continued even as recently as last week. I'm really surprised you are confused by this. You aren't even trying to follow our policies. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let me last chance sir? Really I don't know what the such way to get back my id? SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 12:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I literally am not permitted to lift your ban. See WP:UNBAN for how to get your ban lifted. Note given you were evading your ban just last week, there's no reasonable chance the community will consent to lifting your ban at this point. Your best hope is to go at least six months with zero edits. --Yamla (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should I wait for 6 months? Don't make me hopeless that you did last years? SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 12:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should wait for 6 months with zero edits. Even then, it'll be difficult to get unbanned. You've been very abusive for more than a year. --Yamla (talk) 12:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: The fact that the user can still post on their talk page is a very obvious error (see the block log: it was changed on 21 April by Oshwah, but it really looks like an obvious mistake, an omission). Talk page access should have been revoked long time ago, there is absolutely no reason why the user can still post here, after all the SPI cases (and they're most probably just the tip of the iceberg), after vandalising admins' user pages just a couple of days ago, and after they clearly declared (on this very page) they would continue disrupting Wikipedia (which the user still keeps doing, massively). Could an admin please finally revoke their TPA? Also, I can't see any reason why anyone would think their ban could ever be lifted (6 months would be ridiculous, even 6 years would be absurdly short). The fact that the user is demonstrably a pathological liar (this is not a personal attack, this is a fact proved by the SPI, their countless user pages, their posts on user talk pages etc.) means that the user can never be trusted. Pathological lying does not just disappear, it's a long-term trait. And this user is one of the worst offenders of all time on Wikipedia.—J. M. (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: And just as SR Alamgir Khan was asking you about their unblock options and swearing to God, they were editing Wikipedia using yet another confirmed sock puppet at the same time. Now, please don't take this personally, but I have to ask you or any other admin two things. First, please do not ever suggest any unblock options for SR Alamgir Khan anymore. I can't see any. Second, please finally revoke their talk page access. There is absolutely no excusable reason anymore for this user to be allowed to post anything on their talk page or anywhere on Wikipedia.—J. M. (talk) 23:26, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From today I swear of God/Allah also my parents I will not edit anymore until I get back my id. So please my big boss Yamla make plan for me after 6 months with all my respective admin I begin pardon. Salute to them. God bless them. I apologized you and to them. Good bye sir. God keep you safe. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please block CFW202. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SR Alamgir Khan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 14:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know each others. If you suspect me is totally wrong. We are not same person. In Wikipedia if some talk each others that's doesn't mean they are same person. There is million user in Wikipedia that's doesn't mean all of my ids. SR Alamgir Khan (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please address your comments on the investigation. And seeing your earlier comments on the talk page, you think that may be life-time blocked and soon your talk page editing rights may be revoked because you told lies and denied the sock multiple times. Mercy or Leniency is shown to those who confess their guilt, promise not to do again at the very first unblock request. Thanks. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 15:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SR Alamgir Khan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 02:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pioneer Football League (Bangladesh) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pioneer Football League (Bangladesh) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Football League (Bangladesh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Govvy (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 Pioneer Football League (Bangladesh) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Pioneer Football League (Bangladesh) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Pioneer Football League (Bangladesh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Govvy (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]