User talk:CNMall41

This is CNMall41's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Archives

Help Me - Mistaken Subject matter!

Help me - I have written a short biography draft on Paul Rantao, a prominent Politician in Botswana. I am not sure how to navigate to an article about another person as opposed to an article about self. I was merely creating my account before I wrote and published the article. Now I am told that I cannot write about myself, which is not my intention. Please help me to title the page appropriately. This page will be open to any editor to add or edit information. Bandie Rantao (talk) 03:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bandie Rantao:, thanks for the message. Trust me, I understand how Wikipedia can be confusion, especially when first starting. First, I would steer you to WP:COI, the guideline that talks about conflicts of interest. It is okay if you have one, but it is best to disclose such. Second, review WP:FIRST as this will help guide you in how to start the draft. Currently there are no sources in the draft which is why it was declined by another user. I did a quick search and see the person is mentioned in a lot of sources, namely in Google Books. This would be a good start for sourcing (Google Books that is). Finally, I the notice about it being an autobiography is just a guide for you, not necessarily a warning. It helps inform you of some guidelines and policies to keep in mind if you should be the subject of the page (although it sounds like WP:COI would be the better link based on your above disclosure). If you need help navigating after reading those guidelines and adding sources, please let me know. Good luck!--CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your advise! I hope to get it right, and I hope I can always count on you to guide me along the way! Bandie Rantao (talk) 03:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I hope you can help me. Where do I go to disclose a conflict of interest? I went to the page WP:COI but I cannot navigate my way to the link for that. Bandie Rantao (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bandie Rantao:, I made the disclosure for you at Draft talk:Paul Rantao. You can also do so on your userpage if you wish but what I did on the talk page will suffice. You can also see WP:DISCLOSE if you wish to change it. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Botband78 (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not being able to reply

Hi,I am sorry I couldn't reply you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanvaas in time. I was away for a while. What I meant was, I could feel that notability issue was not there, going through discussion. But as release date was only a few days away, deleting the article altogether could have been avoided. It was there throughout when no release date was even announced, and no one knew when.Awsib (talk) 16:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you are saying. The discussion was closed and then the page was bludgeoned back to mainspace a few days later. This is the reason why I will no longer advocate to draftify pages that don't meet guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About recent edit request response at Talk:George Gadson

You marked the request as done without closing the request, next time, make sure to change the "answered=no"(or "ans=no") parameter to "answered=yes" (or "ans=yes"). I have done this for you, just remember to make sure you close requests when you answer them. Shadow311 (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadow311:, I use the COI response script and forgot to check the completed box. Thanks for closing. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 00:16:03, 20 January 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Callmehelper

Callmehelper (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Tina Dabi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Firstly, thanks for response so quickly. As previously this page of Tina Dabi was rejected, i don't know how much the content that page accomodated at that time. So i can't comment on that. But as far as my creation of this page is concerned, it is well structured, cover all the major policy required for the any page such notability, GNG , Varifibility, etc. It has her all government posts , her govt led program, popularity, controversy etc. Probably there is not a single Reputable newspaper of india left who independently won't cover her at different different events. I mentioned all of them at very NPOV. So I request you to please take a time for review this article. i am sure it will definately qualify to be here as a article.
Thanks. Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Callmehelper:, Can you list the sources that have come out since the last AfD discussion which you feel cover her in-depth? Notability is not about how well a page is structured, it is about the sourcing. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 , its me @Callmehelper
Its about Tina Dabi
Something got wrong here. i can't reply to you . it seems invisible for me. it's not working. should i reply here the all the sources that I think is left that previous time? Callmehelper (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to create a separate heading on this talk page. We can keep it all under one. You can reply with the information at Draft talk:Tina Dabi. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Hi i saw your comment, as im doing it for the first time i dont know to much about how to do it, can you help me in doing this article live its a movie page releasing in india im the producer of the movie i have all the data related to it, please help me on how to solve the error i will provide you all the data and link and you do it for me? Rbofficial17 (talk) 03:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rbofficial17:, thank you for the disclosure. I am willing to assist in any way I can based on your transparency. Since you do have a conflict of interest, disclosure would be required per WP:COI. I made the disclosure for you on the talk page of the draft. I also left a notice at the task force talk page here as there are experienced editors who will be able to provide a second opinion and assist in the draft.In the meantime I would advise reading WP:FIRST. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi now I have added the Critical response also added there links in it and edited some text which was not grammatically correct and also added the link of the official song released on YouTube Rbofficial17 (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic (film)

The Keep comments annoyed me because they seemed superficially correct, and overlooked the restricted definition of notability and so of significant coverage of unreleased films. I had other things to be doing also, but I thought that one was likely to get through otherwise. At least I didn't have to do machine translation, which I often do on these unreleased Indian films. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Congrats on the move as well (stalked your talk page). The film space, especially surrounding India and Pakistan is getting very frustrating, especially with many editors overlooking the UPE and SOCK bludgeoning (not necessarily applicable to this AfD). Note that one of the Keep votes is a SOCK and based on this I can tie to them to another sock farm. Just not pursuing as for some reason I cannot seem to get anyone's attention willing to look at behavioral evidence instead of relying solely on CU evidence. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

kathanar

Hi i will make it shortened,please allow me to change the cast as orderwise which will be easy for users to identify Hashin100 (talk) 08:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great edit as it reduced the plot. As far as the cast, no issues with adding as long as they are actually part of the cast and can be verified. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pacha Group page update

Hi there, hope you're well. I see you have reverted the Pacha Group page due to concerns about promotional tone, thanks for pointing that out. I ran the updated text by one of the other mods (Mean as custard) yesterday, who was confident it was ok to publish. I'm more than happy to work on it some more. Are there any particular parts that need work, or should be removed altogether? Thankyou. Appreciate your input here. Mgoldenbarnes (talk) 08:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mgoldenbarnes:, They did not approve what you wrote as-is. We can keep the discussion on their talk page since it started there. If you would, please address the question that was posed about COI and PAID. Once you do that, we can move forward with a discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You moved the page Nath (TV series) to Nath – Zewar Ya Zanjeer and you gave the reason, "You will need to discuss the move," but the discussion has already taken place on the article's talk page. Kiapkihtrak (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to the old discussion that was started by a SOCK, voted in by other socks? Let's not play games. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cambashi logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cambashi logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ankur Nagpal

Hello, CNMall41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ankur Nagpal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nacelle Company

Hello, CNMall41. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nacelle Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nuke it. I created the redirect, not the draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is about an academic, and there are eight criteria here. Also, lots of material has been sourced

originally it was about eight criteria, of which 1 has been met. Now what? 79.250.56.138 (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is about Gabriele Scheler. That entry has been significantly altered. Lots of sources including wikipedia internal links. Also references to secondary sources. Originally this was an academic article and one of the criteria was met. But somehow this changed. This is a person from academia, so references to published articles is normal. Not clear what is missing. Some bot automatically rejects. Globalist01 (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Globalist01:, I think the first thing that needs to happen is you disclose your WP:COI, as well as the names of any alternative account you are using. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hegde, again

The sock is back at Pooja Hegde's article to white-wash and edit-war once again. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question Regarding Notability Criteria for Faheem Mazhar

Dear CNMall41, Thank you for reviewing my submission for **Faheem Mazhar**, a notable Pakistani classical vocalist. I appreciate your time and feedback. I understand that the article was declined due to concerns about notability and independent coverage. However, I would like to clarify a few points and request guidance: 1. **Comparative Notability** – There are multiple articles on Wikipedia about classical vocalists with **comparatively weaker references**, yet they are still accepted. Given that classical music is a vanishing art form, it is important to document notable figures like Faheem Mazhar who have significantly contributed to the preservation and dissemination of this tradition. 2. **Existing Coverage and Cultural Significance** – While Faheem Mazhar’s media coverage may not be as extensive as some mainstream artists, he has been featured in **Dawn, The News International, and other reputable sources**, and has collaborated with internationally recognized artists like **Nitin Sawhney and Akram Khan**. His work has also been acknowledged in academic studies related to **Hindustani classical music**. 3. **Seeking Guidance** – Could you kindly advise on what **specific types of sources** would be sufficient to establish notability in this case? If additional references are needed, I am happy to continue searching for more substantial coverage. I genuinely appreciate your insights and any direction you can provide. Looking forward to your response. Best regards, [حسنین چوہدری] حسنین چوہدری (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest starting at WP:RS to understand what a reliable source would be. There is also some content in the draft which is not cited so I suggest either removing that or adding a source to support. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Dil Wali Gali Mein

Hi User:CNMall41, I noticed your recent edit on Dil Wali Gali Mein and have undone it because the page is meeting with basic WP:GNG. The page views are growing day by day and also edited by many editor including IPs. If you'd like to discuss this, feel free to reply here. Thanks! PB987 (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not about page views. We can let AfD decide I guess. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits of my reverted

I am telling this to you since you told me to tell you on your talk page. I have made constructive edits on pages such as Ghum Hai Kisi Key Pyaar Mein like family relations. And you said that they are not constructive and according to me, you make a mistake. So please recheck it and if possible, add the things that you erased as I typed them giving my time to improve Wikipedia. Sjsjkd (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, your edits are not constructive. They violate WP:TVCAST. Your editing in a similar manner as two other accounts as well which gives the impression you are using multiple accounts. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me how they violate WP:TVCAST and no, I don't use multiple accounts. Can't more than one person has the same editing manner? Sjsjkd (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You put too much information. You will need to read the guideline. I cannot help you further. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Funny. You requested to be unblocked despite not being blocked. Makes me think it was another account you were confused with. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked earlier. But weirdly that block was removed without any information. Sjsjkd (talk) 05:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Except you show no history of being blocked in the block log. Try again. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to me that information is valid and too much information, according to me, is like putting relatives like aunt-in-law by marriage. Sjsjkd (talk) 05:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia, it is too much information. I cannot help you further so please stay off my talk page. Feel free to use the talk page of the article should you feel the information should be included. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AKM Semiconductor logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AKM Semiconductor logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BelCompany logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BelCompany logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for educating about WP:COAT

I reverted IP’s edit for other reasons such as biased word they used in summary, at Dev Pragad, but the case was COAT which is fair, thanks. Jsphere25 (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Kiran. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Bro what are you doing? Star Kiran owned by Disney+ Hotstar? [[1]] UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@United Blasters:, thanks for the template. Very aware of unconstructive editing which is one of the warnings you were given. I would suggest getting familiar with WP:ONUS as its easier and more productive than edit warring. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:41, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Ramayana: Part 1

Bud, engage in meaningful discussion regarding edits, because you do not one give one good reason why you revert back when someone else edits. Many of the sources mentioned in the article have been thoroughly researched, but even if you find that some source is not verifiable, or is malicious, you either talk to the editor, or you change ONLY that portion. But you do not seem to think that necessary, and you revert all the edits to go back to the one you deem fit. I encourage you to talk more, so we can resolve issues peacefully and in good faith. Sribrahma (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page should be speedy deleted. See the discussion for why I didn't do that. You obviously do not care about Wikipedia process as you moved this right back to the mainspace two weeks after the other AfD was completed. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Bro, I clear about that, Disney+ Hotstar is only a OTT Platform, how it own a channel named Star Kiran? Star channels are Owned by JioStar or Disney Star. Disney+ Hotstar is a OTT platform from Disney Star. Also, i am now aware of Edit Warring. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say. I did look closer at Star Kiran though and it may not even be notable. Regardless, these types of discussions are for the talk pages of those articles which I have tried to tell you several times. I am only one opinion so those pages are better in order to gain consensus for what you are trying to include. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]