User talk:Q3ema

Welcome!

Hello, Q3ema, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Cybersecurity, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cybersecurity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Cybersecurity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I 'am very sorry, I didn’t know I shouldn’t have done that. I won’t do it again. I understand what I'm blocked for, and I will make productive contributions instead. Thank you so much for your understanding and consideration. Q3ema (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cybersecurity (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cybersecurity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Q3ema! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Q3ema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I 'am very sorry, I didn’t know I shouldn’t have done that. I won’t do it again. I understand what I'm blocked for, and I will make productive contributions instead. Thank you so much for your understanding and consideration. Q3ema (talk) 14:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Q3ema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sincerely apologies for what I've done, I'm new in Wikipedia, I didn’t know I shouldn’t have done that. I understand what I'm blocked for, I created a draft article, that's not notable and not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies. Now, that I' am aware, I won’t do it again. My intention is to share my knowledge and create an article with it. I will make sure in creating an article, I understand all the policies and guidelines to be followed. I will make a productive contribution instead. I would like to request that you can delete the article that I made a mistake to unblock my account. Thank you very much for your understanding and consideration. Q3ema (talk) 16:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please tell us what policies you did not follow, what you will do differently, and describe the productive edits you will make If you have any connection to the subject of your edits, please disclose that as well. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Q3ema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for what I've done, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I didn’t know I shouldn’t have done that. I created a draft article, that's not notable and does not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies which are spamming. I understand what I'm blocked for, Now, that I am aware, I won’t do it again. I will make sure in creating an article, I do understand all the policies and guidelines to be followed. I will make a more productive contribution, with the goal of creating a free and reliable, and congenial editing style within community norms in having any connection to the subject of my future edits. My intention is to share my knowledge and create an article with it. I would like to kindly request that you can delete the article in that I made a mistake, and please unblock my account. Thank you very much for your understanding and consideration. Q3ema (talk) 16:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Close as unresponsive, you may make a new request when you can engage with us. 331dot (talk) 16:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please put new postings at the bottom of the page. This is necessary to keep the discussion in the correct chronological order. I have reordered the discussion so it is now in order. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Q3ema. After reading WP:COI (a short version is available at WP:COIE) can you please confirm if you have a conflict of interest with US itek? Details of this COI are not necessary, but if you do have a COI can you please state if it is personal or if you are being paid by this company in any capacity? Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a personal conflict of interest with US itek. 98.118.184.66 (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Q3ema, please confirm below that the above comment is you by logging into your account to edit. Since you have a COI with this topic, I have a couple of questions to help you demonstrate your understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines:

Why were the types of edits you were proposing not allowed on Wikipedia? (Hint: WP:PROMO will help)
How should the information be worded instead? (Hint: WP:NPOV)
What articles are you interested in editing if you are unblocked?

Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cybersecurity

Hello, Q3ema. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cybersecurity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]