User talk:Plagues Of Truth
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200
And here are several pages on what to avoid:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the button; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place
This welcome message was sent by Avi15 at 13:47, August 3, 2008 (UTC) |
A gentle reminder
[edit]Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, your recent edits on Wikipedia, did not appear to conform with Wikipedia policies and guidelines:
- Adding content without citing a reliable source, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Material that is unsourced or poorly sourced will be reverted or removed by other editors or administrators later. Read here for help on citing sources.
- Lacking edit summary: This is considered an important guideline. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you amend or delete any text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit i.e. likely vandals or trolls.
Please stop, and consider the above guidelines if you want to contribute postitively to Wikipedia in the long run. If you feel very strongly that your edits are suitable for inclusion, bring it up at the article talk page for further discussion. Do note the community frown upon disruptive editing, and such actions may led to one's account being blocked next. Thank you. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
2nd Reminder
[edit]This is my 2nd reminder to you on the above. I'm a member of WP:FACT & a RC patroller in Wikipedia and according to your recent edits, I find it rather amusing that you have been adding "fact" tags on several articles while u didn't even included any citations, references and edit summary in any of your recent additions earlier. As such. I'm reverting some of your edits as per WP:V. If you continue with your controversial edits or ignoring my advice again, I'll take the necessary action that may lead your account being blocked next. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 16:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/ColourWolf (3rd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 22:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Indefinitely Blocked
[edit]Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. |