User talk:Molee4real

This is Molee4real's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Counsellorsalah (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP: NMUSICIAN, - Napster, Amazon, Apple Music and Google plus are not acceptable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Counsellorsalah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Counsellorsalah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Molee4real! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Counsellorsalah (May 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Silent ocean limited moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Silent ocean limited, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EditQwerty (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silent ocean limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Silent ocean limited, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.devex.com/organizations/tanzania-ports-authority-tpa-116828. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EditQwerty (talk) 09:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Molee4real. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swalah said Mohamed moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Swalah said Mohamed, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ako Group Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ako Group Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing logged out

Please review WP:SOCK. You cannot log out to remove a speedy deletion template on your articles. Are you being paid for your contributions? Your contributions are far too promotional and the article on Ako Group is not discernible from spam. Do take care to only summarize what independent secondary sources have said about the subject. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Molee4real, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swalah said mohamed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swalah said mohamed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swalah said mohamed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for reaching out. I was away from my computer over the weekend so I apologize for the delay in my response. Anyway, I left this warning because all of your edits so far have been related to Swalah Said Mohamed, creating pages for him and his companies and re-creating them after their deletion. This is taken to mean that your sole purpose of having an account is to promote Mohamed. Wikipedia is for sharing information, not promotion. My advice for creating an article, if that's what you want to do, is to read Help:Your first article. My personal advice is that, in order to warrant an article, an individual must be WP:Notable, which is shown by citations to WP:Reliable sources, which contain in-depth discussion of the subject. Sources like forums and blogs are not reliable and therefore cannot establish notability. In your article on Mohamed, you cite to Forbes, for example, but there does not appear to be any reference to him in the article, so that cannot be counted. If you have questions please let me know, but in general I would advise you to avoid creating more Mohamed-related articles, because you risk your account being banned, temporarily or permanently. I understand you want to promote this individual, but unless he is independently notable, his article will not be kept. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 12:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 19:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Administrators. I am sorry for being a problem in here, And I didn't know that keeping on editing only one page on Wikipedia its A Mess. I have read and understand your Policies. I have realised that I have done a mistake and I am apologizing to be unblocked, and you can make a followup on my Contributions if I will repeat the same mistake. Please if there is a chance unblock me, and I promise not to break any rule I am fine now, I understand what's fine and what's not.Sandstein: Molee4real (talk) 09:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to demonstrate your understanding of the relevant policies by explaining what you did wrong, what steps you will take to avoid doing it again, and tell what constructive contributions you want to make. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 15:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have Changed Hello, Administrators. I was blocked from editing Wikipedia because of violating Wikipedia policy, because I used Wikipedia for advertisements while wikipedia is not a place for advertisement. I have learn a lot of policy, now I know that I can not create any artical about my self or anythinhg that's close to me, there is a way to do it. Now I have understand that while editing an artical your thoughts should not be to praise the topic. I am sorry about my english I am from Tanzania we normally speak Swahili, and I am better in Swahili Version of Wikipedia. So starting today I won't edit anything that aim to advertise anything, I won't start any artical thayt focicus only on promoting something, I won't create any artical about my self. Right now I need to focus on Tourism articals in Tanzania where we it lacks a lot of artical and people need to know about them. Please I insist if possible unblock me, and I will do what Wikipidia Policies needs me to do. Thanks. Molee4real (talk)

Decline reason:

Maybe you should get some more experience with Wikipedia in your native language. Then, once you've got a history of good contributions that you can point to over there, you can ask to be unblocked here. This is only a suggestion, and you can make another unblock request if you want. However, I think this will give you the best chance of being unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have Changed Hello, Administrators. In fact i have already gained a lot of experience in my native language, and my mistake was to use Wikipedia for advertisement, i have read and understand well, That in here people don't use this place for advertising themselves or something. I have understand i have to contribute in different pages rather than only the page i have created. I love wikipedia and i am humble for being punished for violating its Policies. I believe the time that i was banned out from using wikipedia it has taught me A Lot of things about Wikipedia. please Unblock me and make a follow up to see my contributions, from now on i am dealing with Archaeological articals from tanzania. Tank you

Decline reason:

I don't see anything different in this unblock request from the past few declined ones. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Molee4real

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

its fine i understand that maybe i am not good enough for now to be in here, i will not request for unblock again, i will just be here waiting the day that you guys will see maybe i need to be unblocked, cant say i am happy or okay with this, no i'm not but i have no option and its policy that i break so its fine. Thank you administrators. it sucks a lot.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but we do not leave unblock requests open to "just be here waiting the day that you guys will see maybe i need to be unblocked". I suggest you follow the advice given above, and then make an explicit unblock request here at some time in the future when you think you will be able to convince a reviewer to unblock you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Molee4real

I received the following request from this account per e-mail, which I consider inadequate per the declines above, but which I leave for others to evaluate: "hi, Admin. i have been blocked from editing. The blocking coming from you, its fine because i did what i was not supposed to do. I need to apologize for my mistakes, at first i didn't realize what was my mistakes. but after being blocked out of editing space. i have learned a lot. and i think i deserve to be unblocked but if its okay with you. I have tried a lot to ask on my talk page but i am still blocked. Thank You". Sandstein 11:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"hi, Admin. i have been blocked from editing, The reason was "You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion" I agree with the Admin, Due to the lack of understanding of Wikipedia policies, i found my self editing and create randomly, as u can see to my contributions all i knew is i can use Wikipedia as a social media which is not true, I am a Digital Content Creator, i love creating content and publish that is what i do, i never take Wikipedia serious, one of my friend once asked me to help him to create an wikipedia page for him i only knew it will be easy as opening "linkedIn" page, that is why i get in her and just start creating pages without even Reading and understating the policies, despite i have been receiving some Alerts i didn't consider them though until the block appeared. i have been getting warnings and reminders a lot of time, but i didn't listen, even before i got blocked i received this message "Hello, thank you for reaching out. I was away from my computer over the weekend so I apologize for the delay in my response. Anyway, I left this warning because all of your edits so far have been related to Swalah Said Mohamed, creating pages for him and his companies and re-creating them after their deletion. This is taken to mean that your sole purpose of having an account is to promote Mohamed. Wikipedia is for sharing information, not promotion. My advice for creating an article, if that's what you want to do, is to read Help:Your first article. My personal advice is that, in order to warrant an article, an individual must be WP:Notable, which is shown by citations to WP:Reliable sources, which contain in-depth discussion of the subject. Sources like forums and blogs are not reliable and therefore cannot establish notability. In your article on Mohamed, you cite to Forbes, for example, but there does not appear to be any reference to him in the article, so that cannot be counted. If you have questions please let me know, but in general I would advise you to avoid creating more Mohamed-related articles, because you risk your account being banned, temporarily or permanently. I understand you want to promote this individual, but unless he is independently notable, his article will not be kept. Cheers", But after the block i have come to understand that wikipedia its a very sensitive place and respectable not every one can edit whatever they want, and i have come to realize that wikipedia is far different from any Social media, I thank The admin who blocked me because he had helped me to start learning deeply Wikipedia's policies. I have come to understand that the blocking administrator's concern had good intentions, he wanted me to do better. Now i understand that Blocks happen because the community has to prevent certain behaviors, and they want me to understand some things matter to the wikipedia community. I appreciate their concerns. Now i understand and i am still learning calmly, because i have learned from my mistakes which i will never repeat it because i already understand the regulations differ from before, and i promise you that now i will keep to the spirit of community policies by concetrating on editing exist pages rather than starting new pages, and in here (Tanzania) There a lot of Notable Things/People that needs to be on wikipedia but due to the lack of Author's, since i joined the community i found my self Loving wikipedia more and more, since i get blocked i have been so quite out of mood i feel like i lack something because i count wikipedia as one of my family and something i can be doing for passion, and this is why i keep on requesting to be unblocked i believe what i did was not for bad intention it was my first experience in Wikipedia. Thank You. often that is all the truth and the information i can provide.Molee4real (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)molee4real[reply]

Decline reason:

On review, I think that this request, despite being overly long, doesn't actually sufficiently address the reasons you were blocked. Please be concise and specific about what you did wrong in the past and how you will avoid repeating these mistakes. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you provide examples of articles that you would be interested in editing? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This are some of the articles that i will be interested in:- Amboni caves,usambara Railway,usambara mountains,kimweri ye nyumbai there is still alot of articles to be created from Tanzania, East Africa there's a lot people needs to know. I will also be creating bios or the people who made changes in different aspects. Molee4real (talk) 10:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to avoid editing articles about living people or companies that are still in business as part of a conditional unblock? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i will.Molee4real (talk) 05:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandstein, any objections to the above conditional unblock? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, yes: WP:TLDR, also WP:COMPETENCE by the look of it. But your call. Sandstein 22:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Molee4real Well, i have understood the reason admin Rosguill,sandstein to decline my request. but for sure if you can read the instructions i have provided above there is nothing i didn't concern and there is nothing i tell due to my mistake. i have agree that i made a mistake "To use Wikipedia as a place for advertisement, i have created pages to promote individuals but its because at first i didn't know policies and consequences, now i have learned and i choose just to deal with historical/archeology pages but if i will be unblocked. apart from that i have nothing to say otherwise i will be lying. i made a mistake and i regret it and i promise not to do it again.Molee4real (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill,sandstein Hello Admin, is there any way i can delete my account? or i can request my user account to be deleted. because i am no use in here, i have been blocked for my mistakes, Which is not wrong it was true i did what i did, You asked me to admit and to admit that i will never do it again. i did but it seems that i have lack some points in my statement. I dont think that i will get unblocked ever again because what i said was all the truth and all i have to say. Help me on how i can delete my account Wikipedia its not for everyone may be everyone in here has never do a mistake. Thanks. Molee4real (talk) 12:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For copyright reasons, we cannot delete accounts. Sandstein 13:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Administrators, Please. it has been a long time now since i have been blocked, its true i made a mistake to use Wikipedia for promotional/Advertisement. Withi'n this period of time i have read and learn how to be better in here and i have regrets for what i did. I wont repeat again the same mistake and this time around i will only start editing about Archeological articles from East Africa, and other notable toics.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Molee4real (talk) 08:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the consideration of whoever handles this unblock request; Molee4real is most likely the same person as User:Moses rukanima, who was indef blocked in late April 2020 (shortly before the Molee4real account was created) for the exact same reasons (creating the same articles over and over again (not just the different Swalah said mohamed articles, but also Silent ocean limited/Silent ocean), the same claims at AfD...). So it wouldn't be a second chance but a third one, after repeating the same mistakes again while socking. Fram (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Admin Fram its true that, both of these are my accounts. P.S its not a problem to have multiple account. But i asked before how can i delete one of my account if you can review my comment above, because all these mistakes it was before i learn policy and under the guidance of Administrators Molee4real (talk) 11:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]