User talk:Masterhatch

Archives1 03 June 2006 to 06 November 2006
Archices2 07 November 2006 to 29 August 2021

Congradulations

Hello Masterhatch, we and countless of other Wikipedians & Internet users have been chosen 2006 Person of the year, by Time magazine. Congradulations. GoodDay 21:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That weren't yesterday :) GoodDay (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nope! Was a long time ago. Thinking back to my life in November of '06 compared to now... wow things are different. And in a good way. Masterhatch (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do note, my spelling has improved, since then ;) GoodDay (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch

I'm used to Lecen's emotional posts & edit summaries. But, in his edit-summary, he didn't have to snap at you, too. GoodDay (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Water off a duck's back.Masterhatch (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rebellion links

Thanks for fixing those links in the two articles. Probably my fault, although I don't remember it. By the way, I recognise some of locations in your pix from the south-east corner. :) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz, yeah, easy tell where I spend most of my time by my pix! As for fixing links, sometimes at work I have time to kill and that's an easy way to kill time and learn something! I've read so many articles I would never have even thought about reading if I hadn't gone through articles just fixing links. Masterhatch (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t know if you heard: https://regina.ctvnews.ca/mobile/sad-to-see-it-go-renowned-kenosee-restaurant-destroyed-in-overnight-fire-1.5581820 Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 06:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I heard on the radio this morning. Sad. Masterhatch (talk) 06:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Masterhatch, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- TNT (talk • she/they) 00:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Masterhatch!

Happy New Year!

Masterhatch,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Ravenswing 16:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Nomination of List of players who played only one game in the NHL for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of players who played only one game in the NHL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of players who played only one game in the NHL (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Masterhatch. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cbc

You've again deleted the content while referring to the talk page discussion in which you supported not deleting the content on the Poilievre article. I'm not interested in tit for tat editing so could you please explain what you actually want on the article talk page? From what I can see you complained that the material didn't warrant its own subsection, another user chimed in with agreement, the editor who added it asked why and supported leaving the material, you then said you supported leaving the material just in a different subsection. I've moved it twice per that discussion and both times you've deleted it without really saying why. Do you want the material deleted or do you want it moved? XeCyranium (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

XeCyranium several reasons were given by me and another user for its exclusion and not one reason given for inclusion. Before we decide where, we gotta decide if it goes back in. Participate in the discussion on the talk page there and let's see what happens. Masterhatch (talk) 00:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When posting my earlier message I was and still am the last person to have participated in that discussion. You didn't add to the discussion when you last deleted the information while citing the talk page. I don't say this to be rude but I think you may be confusing the different discussions around that article. I'm only talking about the CBC info and its placement. I was under the impression that you supported its inclusion and were against it being placed in a unique subsection because that's the last substantial thing you said on the talk page about it. XeCyranium (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I should have been clearer. I'd support the re-inclusion of defund CBC in a sense that if a strong argument was brought forth to show it should be included, I can be persuaded. User:Peter Gulutzan's most recent edit actually is a reasoned argument to keep it out that has pushed me more towards "exclude". Present your argument for reincluding it and let's see where it goes. Masterhatch (talk) 02:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC) Right now, there are exactly ZERO arguments for reincluding it. That doesn't bode well. Masterhatch (talk) 02:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Masterhatch, I think you forgot to sign your post about tar baby. I might comment later. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert on Kamila Valieva

You reverted my edit, but could you explain why? The page is in the category Tatar sportspeople, so I changed "Russian" to "Tatar" in "Kamila Valeryevna Valieva (Russian: Камила Валерьевна Валиева; Tatar: Камилә Валерий кызы Вәлиева, Kamilä Valeriy qızı Välieva; born 26 April 2006) is a Russian figure skater." Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions | block) 00:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Her nationality is Russian. Further down the article in Personal life it says "Valieva was born on 26 April 2006 in Kazan, Russia. She is of Volga Tatar ethnicity." I hope that helps. Masterhatch (talk) 00:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In "Russian figure skater", can we change "Russian" to "Volga Tatar" or should we add "of Volga Tatar ethnicity"? Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions | block) 01:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an issue if Tatar is added to the lead as long as it remains clear Russian is her nationality. It was replacing Russian with Tatar I had an issue with. Masterhatch (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is that an issue? Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions | block) 03:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She is Russian and you removed that and replaced it with Tatar. That's what the issue is. Having both Tatar and Russian is fine but replacing Russian with Tatar is not. Masterhatch (talk) 04:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

You said in your edit summary of the list of golf courses in Saskatchewan that you believe every article should have a short description. That is a list not an article. You should know the difference. Plus, putting "none" as a short description isn't constructive nor helpful. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 21:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I guess I should've linked to WP:SDNONE in my summary to clarify. Masterhatch (talk) 03:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Time for a summer whee!

		Sunshine!
		Hello Masterhatch! *Ravenswing* has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding `{{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}}` to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! *Ravenswing* 22:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peterson

Howdy. Though I'll keep watching the discussion at Jordan Peterson's page. I'm no longer going to participate there. GoodDay (talk) 18:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. Masterhatch (talk) 22:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as I've been reported to WP:AE. My lack of further participation will likely be enforced. GoodDay (talk) 23:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess "it" was going too far. Reading through the MoS on deadnames and gender, it seems designed to stifle debate, minimise, and censor. But I guess that's par for the course in the world in which we live. Masterhatch (talk) 23:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another way to look at the world in which we live is that Wikipedia aims to follow the highest quality of recent, reliable sources and to ensure best practices where living people are concerned. Newimpartial (talk) 00:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with COI edits on Daryl Katz

Hi. I noticed your interest in hockey and participation in WP:HOCKEY. There are some recent developments regarding NHL team owner Daryl Katz that I would like to clarify in his article. I opened an edit request to revise the text about the dismissed allegations, with suggested language that puts the content in context, makes it more readable, and is more neutral overall. A different editor prematurely closed the request in my opinion. I would really appreciate you reviewing my suggested language and making these changes. Thanks in advance. DJ for Katz (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:DJ for Katz, I brought the issue to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey so anyone interested in hockey can be drawn to the issue. Masterhatch (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pregnancy

I don't know whether you have read the Talk page, since you haven't participated in the discussion there, but there is a clear 6:3 result so far in favour of the material you removed. I would suggest self-reverting, participating in the Talk discussion, or both. I'm also curious how you found that particular edit in the first place. Newimpartial (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have 958 pages on my watch list. I hope that answers your question. Masterhatch (talk) 23:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. You revert my edit to an article you haven't touched in at least 10 years, but the month we toussle at ANI? That doesn't seem like a plausible coincidence to me. Newimpartial (talk) 02:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to understand your concern. I wasn't canvassed if that's what you're thinking. No one asked me to go there. I had actually been following the conversations and edits there for a while. I stepped in when I felt I needed to step in. There are many, and I mean many articles on my watch list that I have never editted. Masterhatch (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have mentioned you Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. -- Colin°^Talk 09:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, roadfan!

Welcome Masterhatch!

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Connecting

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you would like to chat with other editors, you can join the Wikimedia Community Discord server. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions.

Happy editing! Signed, Rs chen 7754 17:10, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

		Happy New Year!
		Hi Masterhatch! Looking backwards, looking forwards, best wishes for the New Year. Happy wikifying! (Regardless of UTC, it is still January 1 where I'm posting!) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for discussion

You are invited to this discussion board, regarding the listing of first and last NHL games. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Man

Hi, I started a talk page topic on man, as you suggested. Here is the link: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Man#What_is_a_man? Born25121642 (talk) 00:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation: Pierre Poilievre

Hello, Masterhatch. You have new messages at Talk:Pierre Poilievre#Lead (March 17 2023).
Message added 20:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LemonberryPie (talk) 20:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fall 2023

Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits on Convoy article

Hey @Masterhatch, user Mittgaurav recently made a few edits to the Canada convoy protest page that seem fairly biased to me, or at least in violation of WP:UNDUE, though the user does seem to be editing in good faith. I have my own biases on this topic (in addition to not having enough experience with WP:NPOV to know where the line is), so I was wondering if you or another experienced user could please review his edits (if they are still there by the time you see this)? --Nsophiay (talk) 03:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, User:Nsophiay. I see User:Nikkimaria removed about half of the additions. I think most of the rest should probably go too (that little tag at the top says the article's too long anyway). I don't have time now. I'll look a little closer tomorrow. Masterhatch (talk) 05:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had a little closer look at the remaining edits. I don't think they are "bad" edits, they just add more bloat to an already bloated article. That article seriously needs to be shortened and cleaned up. Masterhatch (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much all the COVID-era articles need cleaning up lol. Anyway, thanks for checking! --Nsophiay (talk) 17:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Masterhatch: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz^(T) 20:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update on Short Descriptions

Hello! I thought I would follow up with you re: short description edit summaries to say that the dev team has added edit summaries for these edits when using the iOS app. This was a request I filed after your note on my talk page. Thank you! DJ Cane _(he/him) (Talk) 01:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. (I had forgotten about our conversation and had to search your talk to figure out what you were referring to!) Masterhatch (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Korea

I wanted to add Japanese names in the Korean cities as they were formerly named during Japanese rule like Taiwanese cities did. See the map on here for reference. Silence of Lambs (talk) 00:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

jeju

In its 2024 New Year's address, North Korea gave up its sovereignty over the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.252.237.121 (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for that? I reverted cuz you removed content, left no edit summary, and had no source. Masterhatch (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

http://namu.wiki/w/%EC%A1%B0%EC%84%A0%EB%AF%BC%EC%A3%BC%EC%A3%BC%EC%9D%98%EC%9D%B8%EB%AF%BC%EA%B3%B5%ED%99%94%EA%B5%AD%20%EC%B5%9C%EA%B3%A0%EC%9D%B8%EB%AF%BC%ED%9A%8C%EC%9D%98%20%EC%A0%9C14%EA%B8%B0%20%EC%A0%9C10%EC%B0%A8%ED%9A%8C%EC%9D%98

This is the full text of Kim Jong-un's New Year's address. Kim and the ruling Workers' Party recognized dmz as the inter-Korean border from 2024.

https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/pc/view/view.do?ncd=7870167

https://www.chosun.com/politics/north_korea/2024/01/18/KB7Y5YW5Y5E65FTDPFRSZGGPKY/

Then, I erased the South Korean area from the weather forecast and the national map 61.252.237.121 (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding removal of internal links on Glacier

Hi, I am trying to contribute to Wikipedia and I want to understand the reason, why you removed my internal link to "China"?

I expect to get a logical explanation. Thanks. Itz.mas10 (talk) 21:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check out MOS:OVERLINK. We don't need (and, in fact, discourage) linking to common terms such as China, Sweden, glaciers. I also reverted your edit at Wolstenholme Fjord because you linked back to the same article. Masterhatch (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Page: Woman

Hello Masterhatch.

As you recommended, I went to read the talk page. How sad! It's because of things like this that I'm becoming increasingly disillusioned with wikipedia. So much noise for nothing: to keep a photo that isn't even very representative of the female sex in general. Why not a photo of my aunt?

But wiki is like that. And if one day the famous "consensus" establishes that the earth is flat, maybe we'll see that written on a page.

Mcorrlo (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mcorrlo, there's no reason why a better pic can't be found for Woman. I agree, the current one isn't very good BUT we haven't been able to agree on a different one (so stays status quo). I think the only thing that seems to get agreement is no collage. But not everyone agrees on that either. If you see a better picture, bring it up on the talk. I know I'd be willing to agree to a different pic if it was better. Masterhatch (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]