User talk:MapcheckerParis

Welcome!

Hello, MapcheckerParis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for raising the issue and acting upon them. I have been trying to talk some sense to Xuo Tran, but the editing practice adopted has been uncooperative.

EpéeDeLaProvidence

Are you EpéeDeLaProvidence? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pantheon-Sorbonne University

Please use the article talk page and get consensus before making changes. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hello! Please avoid using bare urls for references, as you did at Sorbonne name dispute, as they make it harder to verify the sources and ensure they are reliable. A more complete citation should include title, author, publication, and date. See Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Referencing for beginners for more info. Citation templates like {{cite news}}, {{cite web}}, or {{cite book}} are helpful, and the ReFill tool can be useful as well. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

This is a warning to User:MapcheckerParis and User:Xuo Tran: You are edit warring. If you persist, you may both be blocked from editing. The articles will get along fine without you. Again, use the talk pages and discuss things together. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised a warning about vandalism over the Bibliothèque de la Sorbonne article, with very detailed and verifiable official references. The response I get from User:Xuo Tran is simply to delete that content from the article. You are putting us both at the same level but I am putting forward evidence verifiable by any third party able to read french. In insist that without specific references to the convention the actions of User:Xuo Tran are akin to vandalism. Please take this remark seriously. User:Xuo Tran: second warning. MapcheckerParis (talk) 07:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If your edits are disputed and reverted, regardless of their quality, you must go to the talk page and discuss rather than edit warring. The edit warring at Bibliothèque de la Sorbonne was between 07:34, 5 May 2018‎ and 23:37, 21 May 2018‎. Your article talk post was 22 May. Where was the discussion back and forth that is supposed to happen? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sorbonne Law School (Ecole de Droit de la Sorbonne) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorbonne Law School (Ecole de Droit de la Sorbonne) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne Law School (Ecole de Droit de la Sorbonne) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Xuo Tran (talk) 17:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sorbonne Publishing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorbonne Publishing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne Publishing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Xuo Tran (talk) 17:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sorbonne Art School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorbonne Art School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne Art School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Xuo Tran (talk) 17:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sorbonne name dispute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorbonne name dispute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne name dispute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Xuo Tran (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xuo Tran I've responded in the talk page. You say that there are no references (you must have missed the 30+ verifiable reputable references in the article), feel free to check again. MapcheckerParis (talk) 07:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Sorbonne Grand amphitheatre

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://expatwithkidsinparis.blogspot.fr/2015_01_01_archive.html or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa this is surprising. How else can the grand amphitheatre be described? It does host official ceremonies, and it does host prize awards. It does have a capacity of 1000 people... MapcheckerParis (talk) 07:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The content that was removed was a paragraph about statues, monochrome medallions, and Le Bois Sacré. It's identical to the three paragraphs in the source webpage that start "In six niches there are statues..." — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DiannaaOk, understood. With it deleted, have all the copywright concerns been addressed? Is it safe to remove the banner now?MapcheckerParis (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the article already and there's no other copyvio that I can see. There is no copyvio banner; there's a banner requesting more citations. You should ask User: Graeme Bartlett if it's okat to remove it; that's the person who added it. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have remove the ref improve banner as there is now an independent reference. I had already removed all the copied text that I could find before patrolling the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chancellerie des Universités de Paris

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chancellerie des Universités de Paris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sorbonne.fr/en/the-chancellerie-universites-paris/organisation-and-missions. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, I've addressed your concerns. I've rewritten the article by translating part of the French Wikipedia version. MapcheckerParis (talk) 07:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The new version is okay from a copyright point of view. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chancellerie des Universités de Paris

Hello, MapcheckerParis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chancellerie des Universités de Paris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]