User talk:LoraxJr

Welcome!

Hi LoraxJr! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 18:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
72	LGBT+ Labour (talk)	Add sources
256	Detransition (talk)	Add sources
1,342	Handkerchief code (talk)	Add sources
246	Gender essentialism (talk)	Add sources
37	Heterosociality (talk)	Add sources
15	Rainbow Project (talk)	Add sources
780	Gay-friendly (talk)	Cleanup
141	Transgender people and religion (talk)	Cleanup
422	Transgender sexuality (talk)	Cleanup
244	Pinkwashing (LGBT) (talk)	Expand
63	LGBTQ migration (talk)	Expand
517	Asociality (talk)	Expand
73	Healthcare and the LGBT community (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
168	Homonationalism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
668	Gay village (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
200	Mixed-orientation marriage (talk)	Merge
25	Clannism (talk)	Merge
53	Gender identity under Title IX (talk)	Merge
183	History of gay men in the United States (talk)	Wikify
747	Kathoey (talk)	Wikify
382	Gender neutrality (talk)	Wikify
19	Pink Vote (talk)	Orphan
7	Alexandre Rossi (talk)	Orphan
2	Alice Rebecca Brooks McGuire (talk)	Orphan
199	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
19	Analloeroticism (talk)	Stub
24	Koekchuch (talk)	Stub
20	Gay media (talk)	Stub
54	LGBT rights organization (talk)	Stub
61	Liberal homophobia (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Transgender sexuality, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have removed the sources that were attributed by the templated as "failed verification", I assumed that sources that do not verify the paragraph they are inserted in should be removed and the template "citation needed" is more applicable? Do you think this is incorrect? Sorry, I am new to wikipedia, would appreciate some clarification. --LoraxJr 10:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thats all fine, but please always make such explanations in the edit summary, not after you've made your edit. We (experienced moderators) can guess what you intended to do, but we don't like guesswork, as we meet too many freaky editors, every single hour. Успехов. Materialscientist (talk) 11:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Should I redo the edit with the explanation in the edit summary? Another question, regarding this article. I have noticed it is missing a lead. I think some information from the first paragraph should be moved into the lead with some extension. Is it appropriate to rephrase the main theme of the article in my own words and put it there with some citations, or does it have to contain exclusive information from different sources? --LoraxJr 05:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trigg hound

Good work with the redirect. We never got your ping on the Talk page. Please see these in editing mode: I believe that instead of using @William Harris (talk · contribs), it should have been @William Harris: - William Harris (talk) 12:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, this explains why you do not always see my questions. Thank you, will use it now) --LoraxJr 12:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, could you help me to find some sort of tool that will allow to sign discussions automatically? A script maybe? I keep forgetting to sign. --LoraxJr 19:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying/moving content within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Husky into Siberian Husky. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, I was not aware of this rule. I have, indeed, copied information before and other users have not made this point to me, I will fix the issue now. --LoraxJr 09:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I have inserted templates into the pages I have edited in the past, and got a question, is this required even on the pages that became redirects as they were merged to other pages?--LoraxJr 09:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Husky- Siberian Husky Redirect

Hello - It appears you recently redirected the Husky page to Siberian Husky in an attempt to clear up some superfluous information that you copied from one page to the other. However, these articles are of related but not identical topics, and redirecting an article removes the original article, effectively replacing it with the redirect. In the future, for changes that will affect the entirety of an article in this way, please start a discussion on the article's Talk page. I have reverted the change and will look to make further improvements to the Husky page in the near future.

Thank you - Mcfuggins (talk) 22:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This topic was discussed on the Talk page of Dogs portal and it was suggested that articles should merged and cleared out, I have not made that decision by myself. However your recent work on improving both articles mostly solves the issues that made other editors to propose merging, thank you for your contribution.--LoraxJr 13:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]