User talk:LavaBaron/Archive 4
no archives yet (create) |
|
Your GA nomination of Leschi (fireboat)
[edit]The article Leschi (fireboat) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Leschi (fireboat) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 11:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Bob1960evens thanks much, I'll edit the article to incorporate your suggestions within the next few days. Thanks again! LavaBaron (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Walter Loving
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Walter Loving you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 05:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sainsf - thanks for your feedback, I appreciate your review. I'm sorry for my delayed response, however, will make the changes you recommended within the next few days. Best - LavaBaron (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi LavaBaron! Happy to make a new friend. Please go through the issues carefully, and you need not be sorry. Your article is awesome! Good luck Sainsf <^>Talk all words 18:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sainsf! LavaBaron (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi LavaBaron! Happy to make a new friend. Please go through the issues carefully, and you need not be sorry. Your article is awesome! Good luck Sainsf <^>Talk all words 18:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, LavaBaron,
I have reviewed the above nomination, and have perceived a possible issue. Your input may resolve the issue.
I must add that I admire your grit in presenting this national security issue in a rational manner.
Georgejdorner (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your good feedback; replied at DYK. LavaBaron (talk) 18:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rideau Cottage
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rideau Cottage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Saskoiler -- Saskoiler (talk) 06:01, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rideau Cottage
[edit]The article Rideau Cottage you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rideau Cottage for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Saskoiler -- Saskoiler (talk) 22:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your excellent feedback, Saskoiler - I'll make the changes you recommended within the next two days. Best - LavaBaron (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Great. I've done quite a few writing reviews in my career, but this is the first GA review I've done in Wikipedia. I'd really like to develop this skill to give quality, in-depth reviews. Saskoiler (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
LP - Do Not Reply Here, Please Just Consider Stopping
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Legacypac - despite the clear explanation of WP:TPO left you by DESiegel [1] you promptly continued to edit and delete my comments again [2]. You've done this on numerous past occasions (most previously here [3]) and I've previously politely requested you stop. If you continue doing so I will seriously consider taking the matter to ANI at some point in the future.
My comment about you was not a "personal attack" (however, you describing it as such most certainly is and calling me a lying troll in edit summaries is as well). That you have previously imposed unilateral changes on WP has been established in ANI here and other places, for which you've been cautioned; it is an objective fact. My comment was in reply to a specific question by another editor regarding an unusual edit of yours he had to undo. Simply slapping "personal attack" in an edit history is not sufficient to overcome the high standard required for editing others comments. If you truly feel it was a personal attack, you need to bring it to ANI.
I do not wish the permanent record of my comments altered by you to change their meaning. I know you will continue to edit and delete my, and others, comments in discussion pages freely and there's nothing I can do about it, however, I will continue politely requesting you stop anyway. Thank you for your consideration. Best - LavaBaron (talk) 18:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is nothing polite about your continued abusive trolling. I urge you to stop posting personal attacks all over the site against me. Your behavior is despicable (including in the ANi thread you referenced), you spout lies (including right here), and such actions are best described as trolling. Don't post lies about me and you will not have to worry about having the personal attacks removed. Legacypac (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Legacypac - disagreeing with you in an edit discussion does not constitute a "personal attack", though you repeatedly characterize such disagreements thusly. If you feel I am making "personal attacks all over the site against" you, you should bring it to ANI. There, you will probably be asked for diffs of the "personal attacks" that you regularly claim I, and others, are continually spreading across WP against you. As you know, you have previously been cautioned by admins and other editors to stop characterizing disagreements you have with other editors as "personal attacks" and "trolling" (e.g. [4], etc.).
- I've, for the sixth time, requested you obey WP:TPO and stop editing my comments. You've read my request; mission accomplished. In light of your decision to respond to my request by calling me "despicable", I am afraid I must request you not post on this Talk page again. Thank you. LavaBaron (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Legacypac - disagreeing with you in an edit discussion does not constitute a "personal attack", though you repeatedly characterize such disagreements thusly. If you feel I am making "personal attacks all over the site against" you, you should bring it to ANI. There, you will probably be asked for diffs of the "personal attacks" that you regularly claim I, and others, are continually spreading across WP against you. As you know, you have previously been cautioned by admins and other editors to stop characterizing disagreements you have with other editors as "personal attacks" and "trolling" (e.g. [4], etc.).
Your GA nomination of Rideau Cottage
[edit]The article Rideau Cottage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rideau Cottage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Saskoiler -- Saskoiler (talk) 17:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Walter Loving
[edit]The article Walter Loving you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Walter Loving for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
From a deeply touched friend to a most amiable friend with loads of good wishes! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 17:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Exercise Vigilant Eagle
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Exercise Vigilant Eagle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Presidential Emergency Facility
- added a link pointing to Nuclear blast
- Walter Loving
- added a link pointing to Caucasian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
File:USAFA Band logo.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:USAFA Band logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Ground-Mobile Command Center
[edit]On 18 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ground-Mobile Command Center, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "doomsday trucks" may hit the road following a catastrophic nuclear attack against the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ground-Mobile Command Center. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 18 March
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the United States military bands page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rob Roy (dog)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rob Roy (dog) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 11:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Emergency Federal Register
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Emergency Federal Register at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
File:TrolliCandyFerrara.png
[edit]The image File:TrolliCandyFerrara.png has been listed for possible deletion here because there is concern about it's copyright status. Please feel free to comment on the discussion. Also feel free to ask me any questions if this confuses you. Thank you, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Infobox
[edit]The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rob Roy (dog)
[edit]The article Rob Roy (dog) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rob Roy (dog) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Hai, I have put this for FLC. Can you spare some time to take a look at it.--Inside the Valley (talk) 12:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mercados Libres Campesinos
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mercados Libres Campesinos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 18:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mercados Libres Campesinos
[edit]The article Mercados Libres Campesinos you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mercados Libres Campesinos for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of United States Capitol cornerstone laying
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article United States Capitol cornerstone laying you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
GA Reviews
[edit]User:Sainsf, User:MPJ-DK, User:Parsecboy, User:Bob1960evens - thank you for reviewing my articles for GA status. Strangely, it seems, all of your reviews have hit while I'm out of town with limited internet access. If it's not too much trouble I was hoping you might be willing to give me some leeway in terms of the deadline for completion of corrections and edits? I anticipate being connected again during the second week of April. Thanks for your consideration. LavaBaron (talk) 13:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi LavaBaron. I have kept Rob Roy on hold every since I saw the wiki break notice on your user page. So no worries, I expect you by the second week of April. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 13:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- No problems. I'll make a note on the GA review page. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I agree, no problem at all, I will make a note on the review page so that I do not forget ;-) MPJ-US 21:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Same here, take the time you need. Parsecboy (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Emergency Federal Register
[edit]On 31 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emergency Federal Register, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States' official journal, The Federal Register, may be suspended and replaced with the Emergency Federal Register in the event of an attack against the country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emergency Federal Register. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I've re-reviewed your nomination. The hook could be made a little more interesting, and it's good to go. Alternatively, you could write up a different hook. - Mailer Diablo 06:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]Hi LavaBaron: A recent edit you performed at DYK has been reverted. You may want to check it out. North America1000 06:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Presidential Emergency Facility
[edit]On 1 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Presidential Emergency Facility, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that President Obama lost his cannonball, cowpuncher, and corkscrew, but retains his crown and palace? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Presidential Emergency Facility. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Education of the British Royal Family, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queen Elizabeth and Diana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association
[edit]The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Premier ensemble
[edit]On 10 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Premier ensemble, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the U.S. Marine Band, a U.S. military premier ensemble, is the oldest continuously active professional music organization in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Premier ensemble. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Attempted theft of George Washington's head, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for United States military bands
[edit]On 12 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article United States military bands, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the regimental band of the U.S. Army's 369th Regiment (the "Harlem Hellfighters Band") is credited with introducing jazz to Europe during World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States military bands. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ted Cruz
[edit]The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Cruz. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:BluePeaked.png
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:BluePeaked.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of United States Capitol cornerstone laying
[edit]The article United States Capitol cornerstone laying you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:United States Capitol cornerstone laying for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
[edit]The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | ||
Please accept this belated 25 DYK medal: you're almost due for your next one. But at least you got a pony for bonus :). Thanks for your tireless contributions, your hard work is greatly appreciated! Zanhe (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Rob Roy (dog)
[edit]The article Rob Roy (dog) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rob Roy (dog) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mercados Libres Campesinos
[edit]The article Mercados Libres Campesinos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mercados Libres Campesinos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leschi (fireboat)
[edit]The article Leschi (fireboat) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leschi (fireboat) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 22:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Documents for Contingencies (Other than a Plan D Situation) Which Justify Application of Emergency Measures on a National Scale
[edit]On 18 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Documents for Contingencies (Other than a Plan D Situation) Which Justify Application of Emergency Measures on a National Scale, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that FEMA's "Other than a Plan D Situation" file includes draft legislation to waive penalties for the late-filing of income tax by persons residing in cities destroyed by nuclear attack? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Documents for Contingencies (Other than a Plan D Situation) Which Justify Application of Emergency Measures on a National Scale. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Documents for Contingencies (Other than a Plan D Situation) Which Justify Application of Emergency Measures on a National Scale), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 17:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Education of the British Royal Family
[edit]On 19 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Education of the British Royal Family, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1970, Prince Charles became the first heir to the British throne to complete a university degree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Education of the British Royal Family. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Education of the British Royal Family), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Attempted theft of George Washington's head
[edit]On 19 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Attempted theft of George Washington's head, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the attempted theft of George Washington's head, the body of Bushrod Washington was accidentally decapitated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Attempted theft of George Washington's head. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Attempted theft of George Washington's head), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Education of the British Royal Family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Exercise Vigilant Eagle
[edit]The article Exercise Vigilant Eagle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Exercise Vigilant Eagle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 17:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Woodstock Observer
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Woodstock Observer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 21 April
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Prince Harry page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LavaBaron reported by User:Firebrace (Result: ). Thank you. Firebrace (talk) 21:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
[edit]I have checked the report on you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. My conclusion is that you were edit-warring, but that a block is not necessary, as long as you do not continue to edit-war. It is clear to me that you genuinely thought that your edits didn't count as edit-warring, but your reasons for thinking so were mistaken. Please read the more detailed account I gave there to see why.
Re-reading my post there, I think I may have at times expressed myself in terms which were less friendly than they might have been, considering that I believe you were acting in good faith, but it took me a fairly long time to draft the message, and I am short of time now, so rather than rewriting it all I am just asking you to excuse any wording which may seem less friendly than it might have been. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, JamesBWatson. Can you separately look into this, where the reporter claims he/she is "gaslighting" me with the 3RR report [5] and this [6] where they bring those same taunts about "apple pie" to a simple barnstar thread on an uninvolved editor's page? I have never, in my life, seen this type of vile, taunting behavior countenanced on a noticeboard. And all this from an editor who says his/her goal is to "punish Wikipedia." I respet your ruling on the 3RR and probably agree with it but the unintended consequence is that a highly disruptive user has been heavily empowered and will take this as a cue that he/she can increase the personal vitriol to an 11. And I anticipate the full-section blankings on the article of original report will now proceed full-steam ahead. Given that, should I just go ahead and close the RfCs? They seem pointless now as the sections will be blanked regardless of outcome. LavaBaron (talk) 09:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- The taunting edits at User talk:Kautilya3 were totally unacceptable. I have warned the editor that continuing with similar taunting may lead to being blocked, and I meant it, so please let me know if you get any more harassment from that editor. The edit you link to at the edit-warring noticeboard is a little more equivocal. It was expressed in rather silly sarcastic terms, but it may possibly have been intended to convey a genuine message. If so, it was very ill-judged, in my opinion, but I think there is enough room for doubt about what the intention was that it is best to ignore it. I have no idea what the editor meant by "punishing Wikipedia". It looks to me completely meaningless. As for your speculations about the effects on the editor's future editing, that is a bridge to be crossed if and when we come to it. I don't know about the RfCs, and I don't particularly wish to get involved with them. That is a matter for you to decide. However, please note that the decision that the existence of those RfCs does not justify edit-warring is a decision only on that one issue: it does not imply, for example, that editing contrary to consensus in those RfCs is acceptable, that the editor who filed the edit-warring report is free to edit-war contrary to such consensus, or that nothing else other than edit-warring can be done if there is problematic editing contrary to consensus. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- That makes sense, JamesBWatson. Thanks for being so responsive and my apologies for issues I was responsible for creating by not being attentive enough to 3RR. I'll take a break from this article for a few weeks so as to let the situation deflate. Best regards - LavaBaron (talk) 04:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- The taunting edits at User talk:Kautilya3 were totally unacceptable. I have warned the editor that continuing with similar taunting may lead to being blocked, and I meant it, so please let me know if you get any more harassment from that editor. The edit you link to at the edit-warring noticeboard is a little more equivocal. It was expressed in rather silly sarcastic terms, but it may possibly have been intended to convey a genuine message. If so, it was very ill-judged, in my opinion, but I think there is enough room for doubt about what the intention was that it is best to ignore it. I have no idea what the editor meant by "punishing Wikipedia". It looks to me completely meaningless. As for your speculations about the effects on the editor's future editing, that is a bridge to be crossed if and when we come to it. I don't know about the RfCs, and I don't particularly wish to get involved with them. That is a matter for you to decide. However, please note that the decision that the existence of those RfCs does not justify edit-warring is a decision only on that one issue: it does not imply, for example, that editing contrary to consensus in those RfCs is acceptable, that the editor who filed the edit-warring report is free to edit-war contrary to such consensus, or that nothing else other than edit-warring can be done if there is problematic editing contrary to consensus. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
For taking bad news well, and having the cheek to request your own barnstar. Much deserved! ツStacey (talk) 09:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC) |
- Gracias, Stacey - LavaBaron (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts
[edit]The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (New York)
[edit]On 24 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (New York), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 has been described as "New York's first all-out welcoming parade"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (New York). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (New York)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WormTT(talk) 21:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Woodstock Observer
[edit]On 25 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Woodstock Observer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Woodstock Observer was the second attempt to establish a newspaper in Woodstock, Vermont? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Woodstock Observer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Woodstock Observer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WormTT(talk) 09:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for The Royal Welch Fusiliers (march)
[edit]On 25 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Royal Welch Fusiliers (march), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "The Royal Welch Fusiliers" is the only march written by John Philip Sousa for a British Army regiment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Royal Welch Fusiliers (march). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Royal Welch Fusiliers (march)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WormTT(talk) 09:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (Philadelphia)
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (Philadelphia) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for United States Coast Guard Pipe Band
[edit]On 27 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article United States Coast Guard Pipe Band, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States Coast Guard tartan is patterned in a ten-thread count to represent the first ten ships of the Revenue-Marine? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, United States Coast Guard Pipe Band), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Federal Relocation Arc
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Federal Relocation Arc at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 00:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 10:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
(Another user) added an alt that needs review. North America1000 10:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for 1st Cavalry Division Horse Cavalry Detachment
[edit]On 30 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1st Cavalry Division Horse Cavalry Detachment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2014, the U.S. Army's 1st Cavalry Division Horse Cavalry Detachment was assigned its first female commander? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1st Cavalry Division Horse Cavalry Detachment. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1st Cavalry Division Horse Cavalry Detachment), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cowlibob (talk) 11:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
File:SNLROMNEY2016.png listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SNLROMNEY2016.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- David S. Cohen (attorney)
- added links pointing to J.D. and Treasury Department
- Officer of the United States
- added links pointing to Simple majority and National Academy of Public Administration
- Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing
- added a link pointing to Mater Dei High School
- List of United States military premier ensembles
- added a link pointing to Blue Room
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for 191st Army Band
[edit]On 1 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 191st Army Band, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States' 191st Army Band has the special unit designation "Band of the Wild West"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/191st Army Band. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 191st Army Band), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Presidential Salute Battery
[edit]On 3 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Presidential Salute Battery, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the U.S. Army's Presidential Salute Battery uses the World War II-era M5 gun? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Presidential Salute Battery. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Presidential Salute Battery), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Federal Relocation Arc
[edit]On 4 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Federal Relocation Arc, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite preparing for a variety of situations, many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Federal Relocation Arc. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Federal Relocation Arc), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (Philadelphia)
[edit]On 4 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (Philadelphia), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a dozen temporary triumphal arches were constructed in Philadelphia for the entrance of the Marquis de Lafayette into the city in 1824? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (Philadelphia). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (Philadelphia)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Diplomatic correspondence
[edit]On 5 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Diplomatic correspondence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the customary salutation used in letters from one president to another is "My Great and Good Friend"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Diplomatic correspondence. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Diplomatic correspondence), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family
[edit]The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Organized horse fighting
[edit]On 5 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Organized horse fighting, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that organized horse fighting has been a traditional Miao Chinese New Year observance for 500 years? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Organized horse fighting), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of U.S. Coast Guard Ceremonial Honor Guard
[edit]Hello! Your submission of U.S. Coast Guard Ceremonial Honor Guard at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein (talk) 13:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Officer of the United States
[edit]On 7 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Officer of the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that officers of the United States have been delegated part of the "sovereign power" of the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Officer of the United States. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Officer of the United States), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Planned presidential transition of Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Academy of Public Administration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
North America1000 22:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]US history and biographies
Thank you for all the well-researched biographies and history articles, related to the US, you have authored, for careful GA reviews, and your cooperative attitude to build the encyclopedia. Be proud of yourself, for you are an awesome Wikipedian!
Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Presidential transition
[edit]Made a few friendly linkages, wording changes and updates on your Presidential transition article. Found it just as I was going to write the same new article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Planned presidential transition of Mitt Romney for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planned presidential transition of Mitt Romney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planned presidential transition of Mitt Romney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of David S. Cohen (attorney)
[edit]Hello! Your submission of David S. Cohen (attorney) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SJ Morg (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Residence of the United States Ambassador to the United Nations
[edit]The article Residence of the United States Ambassador to the United Nations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Residence of the United States Ambassador to the United Nations for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Notecardforfree -- Notecardforfree (talk) 03:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of United States presidential election, 2024 for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States presidential election, 2024 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2024 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wickypedoia (talk) 11:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Republic of Venice
[edit]The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republic of Venice. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Poet Laureate of Washington
[edit]On 18 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poet Laureate of Washington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the office of Poet Laureate of Washington was established in 2007, it was proposed to pay the incumbent with a firkin of beer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poet Laureate of Washington. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Poet Laureate of Washington), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.