User talk:LVGolf34

May 2022

This is an example of a self promotion link I added to Reflection Bay? It is completely about the pros at High Performance Golf Institute that is located at Reflection Bay? Yes, I wrote it and am proud of it. It is the best and most comprehensive article available about the HPGA. It is no way should go against guidelines of Wikipedia in this instance as I am a niche writer providing quality information. Thank you. https://www.lasvegasgolfinsider.com/2022/04/28/lake-las-vegas-tour-pros-reveal-key-to-great-golf-play-tension-free/

Thank you very much for reaching out. I in now way was trying to spam by adding these links. I am a Las Vegas golf author and writer for 30 years and the information that I have added, I believe, is additive to the Wikipedia experience for users. A golfer will be searching information for a course they may want to play and if there is a small link to a guide that may assist them, I believe this would be helpful. The links I provide also have direct links to the official course websites, another advantage of these links, which also include addition quality information. Thanks!!

Please do not be adding work that you have created. It is considered self-promotion and is not allowed. If you would like to add that information to the article, please find it from a different website. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The entire goal of Wikipedia is to provide quality information. In many cases, I am the only writing about this and while it can be viewed as self promotion, what can I do if I provide this quality service. Stunned at my first experiences with Wikipedia and I would ask you take a look at this page, which surely you are familiar with. Again, I have added only insightful information to each of the pages I have edited and info that people would love to know. The fact that I wrote it only adds to the qualify of the editor in this case.

Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary LVGolf34 (talk) 20:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion. The entire purpose of your account seems to be promoting your own webpage. Also, the page you linked is an essay -- not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be missing the point here. It doesn't matter if the articles you have written are the most comprehensive available. It still counts as self-promotion to be adding your website to dozens of pages. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So here is my final reply and I am stunned by this. Yes, I would love more people to read these articles. And, yes, I just got involved with Wikipedia. I can see your point about me adding some of the links to the "guides" but the links to the actual articles are exactly when Wikipedia is and should be about. Providing the best information? Did I overdo some of the links? Maybe. Should they all be reverted? Don't think so. I ask you to reconsider your approach in this matter as I am not a fly by night web operator, but one who has spent three decades covering golf in Las Vegas. I am considering re-reverting some of your edits, but will not on some others. I hope you can see the quality of the work and each case should be handled differently. I could have made a dummy account and made these edits but I am upfront, honest and provide the best information that I can. Thanks again. LVGolf34 (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Rio Secco Golf Club have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Las Vegas Tribe of Paiute Indians of the Las Vegas Indian Colony, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golf in Las Vegas (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Golf in Las Vegas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Golf in Las Vegas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LVGolf34! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Modussiccandi (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Golf in Las Vegas

Hello, LVGolf34. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Golf in Las Vegas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Golf in Las Vegas

Hello, LVGolf34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Golf in Las Vegas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]