Jump to content

User talk:Kaleem6061

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Kaleem6061, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tufail Ahmed (January 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kaleem6061! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Traphaven (February 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Traphaven (March 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ezlev was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
warmly, ezlev. talk 18:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Our paid editing policy also requires you to link to and disclose any sites where you advertise your editing services. This includes sites like Freelancer or Upwork. Please follow up with this and finish the disclosure before editing again. Thanks. CUPIDICAE💕 18:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sankhan02 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sankhan02. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaleem6061 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a paid editor as it is already disclosed on my user page. I was hired to make changes to a page that could have caused it. Kindly check all my submits of the articles, you will see my positive effort in researching the content for it and positive intention for publishing it. I wan't trying to dodge the system. Kindly reconsider to revert my account to live so i can contribute. Kaleem6061 (talk) 14:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked as a sockpuppet, but you barely acknowledge this in your request. In your next unblock request, you should clearly address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 14:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting for unlock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaleem6061 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My only paid id is Kaleem6061 and i haven't used multiple accounts intentionally or by mistake - to my knowledge. I got hired for multiple works and made changes and submission accordingly. I have seen the report mentioning all the concerned user accounts and i have no connection to them. I was hired to make changes to the article which coincidentally multiple of the mentioned user were also a part of. Kindly consider to unblock. I have put a lot of good effort. Kaleem6061 (talk) 15:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"I was hired to make changes to the article which coincidentally multiple of the mentioned user were also a part of" yes, that means you were indeed violating WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Greenman (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelica Morrone (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:03, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]