Jump to content

User talk:Jussie2024

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Jussie2024, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jussie2024! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Laguna Lakeshore Expressway Dike have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Subic Clark Railway (May 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Grabup (talk) 09:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can i delete the draft Jussie2024 (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Bilfinger. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 14:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to CRRC Qingdao Sifang CR151 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halcrow. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:2024 Uttar Pradesh stampede, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 19:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:2024 Uttar Pradesh crowd crush, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 19:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to 2024 Hathras crowd crush. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Please do not keep trying to move this page, or "correct" information on it, to change the wording from stampede to crowd crush. The wording of "stampede" is prevalent in most sources, and we should use the state level rather than the district level for the name, as has already been said on the previous move. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 19:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hiwilms. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to MRT Line 7 (Metro Manila) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do not change rail color hex codes against the official color codes assigned by the Department of Transportation. HiwilmsTalk 17:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to North Luzon Expressway has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at the following railway-related templates:

Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Again, do not change colors against the official colors assigned by DOTR. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. HiwilmsTalk 15:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you recommend a way to "scan/skim through" PH newspaper archives?

[edit]

Hello, I'm also a Filipino editing Wikipedia (since June 2024), and I found you were also editing Wikipedia pages of the Philippines' train lines. You also mostly add citations or content, and I wanted to learn more on searching for references. I appreciate your edit on MRT-3 of adding a newspaper citation on the planned tunnel from Buendia to Gil Puyat (LRT-1), but I find it somewhat impossible for me to scan every newspaper entry in the Philippine Daily Inquirer or Manila Standard (both are archived in Google Books in select years) to verify a claim needing a citation.

My question about searching references is: May you recommend a more efficient to find for keywords in newspaper articles or infer the "best time period' (the month of a year) for the claim to be in a newspaper? A "find" function is what comes to my mind, which isn't possible in the Google Books scans. You can generally infer when a newspaper article related to a train line's construction/development was published, but it just needs a lot of time to browse each daily.

I initially do a simple search of key terms in Google or Edge, or search for similar references already used in Wikipedia, then in sources similar to JSTOR. I also use the Index to Philippine Newspapers of UP Diliman, but it's sometimes inadequate, since I can't find a digital copy of the article. I can commute to a nearby library (QCPL, Rizal Library) to read it myself, paper or microform, but I prioritize digital copies.

If you'd like more clarifications on what I'd like to ask, kindly inform me. Thank you in advance and have a good day. RFNirmala (talk) 06:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gammon Construction, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Just to let you know, editor Jussie2024, Denis Oswald is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the person, the way you did at 125th IOC Session, please use:

[[Denis Oswald (sports official)|Denis Oswald]]

See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 04:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at 24 Oras, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 08:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another warning

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 24 Oras, you may be blocked from editing. Hotwiki (talk) 14:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to LRT Line 1 (Metro Manila). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. These articles were changed as part of Talk:MRT Line 3 (Metro Manila)#Requested move 5 May 2020 and your moves, which were done by moving the page multiple times to scramble the title, were incredibly disruptive. Please stop with these kinds of moves. Sennecaster (Chat) 00:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page LRT Line 1(Metro Manila) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Subic Clark Railway

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jussie2024. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Subic Clark Railway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Flibirigit (talk) 19:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the format of dates

[edit]

Information icon Please don't change the format of dates. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Flibirigit (talk) 19:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mindanao Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel train.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not using the edit summary

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 14:13, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the third time (second time from me), that you're being told to use the edit summary. You are also oddly unresponsive in your own talk page. Consider this as a warning. Hotwiki (talk) 14:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I was typing in your talkpage, you reverted back your unexplained edit without any explanation.[1] I already explained through my edit summary why your edit was reverted in that article. The next time, you made another edit without using the edit summary, you would be reported to the administrators. Hotwiki (talk) 14:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I looked back at this[2] and I assumed you reverted back your edit. I apologize for making a wrong assumption. But still, please use the edit summary to avoid confusion/misunderstanding from your fellow editors. Hotwiki (talk) 14:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]