User talk:Jondpe

Welcome!

Hello, Jondpe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Jondpe, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article conforms. What do you mean? How is it promotional when it’s about a popular blog in Cameroon. Are you in Cameroon to refute its popularity ? Jondpe (talk) 13:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jondpe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Jondpe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Page should be published on Wikipedia Jondpe (talk) 13:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia only accepts articles about topics that meet its definition of a notable subject. For a subject to be considered notable, it must have already received in-depth coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources. Lack of such coverage means that the topic isn't notable enough for inclusion.

You also wrote the content on your userpage (User:Jondpe). The purpose of a userpage is for you to write a small amount about yourself, your interests and goals as a Wikipedia editor, and any disclosures of conflict of interest or paid editing. New articles should be written in either your user sandbox or the draft article space. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Raymond Kalla, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by their surname only. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Afriblinksblog moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Afriblinksblog, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It really hurts your case when you keep moving an article around the project to different titles, to main space to draft space and back again. Please do not do this in the future. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liz. Hope you are good? I totally understand where you are coming from. Please permit me to explain myself while stating I’ve taken note, won’t repeat in the future.

So, I did a draft article, a couple of people edited. I thought it was okay. I didn’t see the “submit for review option”. I then moved it to article. After that, an admin moved it back to draft saying I should submit for review. So, I did submit for review. I was thinking panning to move it to “TALK” for others to give their opinions on what they think about this article. I mistakenly clicked “Article”. So I had to move it back to draft. I’m sorry for any inconveniences. Jondpe (talk) 08:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Afriblinksblog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Afriblinksblog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello Jondpe. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jondpe. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jondpe|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, thank you so much for taking out your time to tell me

more. It’s a pleasure as we keep learning everyday. But then, I’m not paid to write this article. I mean, I’m new to Wikipedia, just practicing writing. Who will pay me to write an article? Why won’t they pay others already in the field ? Again, I’m not associated to this subject. Wikipedia is said to be a place to cover notable subject matters that aren’t already covered. I follow a lot of African entertainment websites. That’s part of the reason I covered that website. Because I saw we have other notable websites like Tooexclusive on Wikipedia. Then, I had to cover Afriblinksblog and was planning to work on more till you came saying my article is suitable for deletion. I really do not understand the amount of sources you want me to put. I placed over 20 sources there. For a subject to be notable, I believe it should be known in independent sources across it’s area ? Now! I researched on that website. They went very popular in Cameroon for interviewing the president’s daughter. They have been cited on TV, news etc. I really don’t know how writing about it makes it promotional. I was planning on taking up another popular website. But I don’t know, I think the way you treat new writers is discouraging. I understand it’s a way for protection but then, I really don’t know what you want new writers who truly have ambition of taking up the wikipedian duty seriously to do. Other admins just edited which made me happy I’m getting there but you came with “it’s promotional”. You didn’t state a particular thing that makes it promotional. You spoke about sources, does it not have sources ? I’m confused. Over 20 sources. I tried my best to research on this subject matter. I really don’t understand that. I read a lot on how to write articles, followed other articles format for websites, added many sources as compared to others but you said mine is promotional. I’m yet to understand why you say it is promotional. Did I use promotional words ? How can it be promotional? Anyways, Just wish to say I was truly doing an article on a notable subject. I’m not related to the subject nor was paid for this. I saw the Wikipedia rules on payment. If I did would have acknowledged.Thank you so much for trying to help me grow in the Wikipedia society. Jondpe (talk) 06:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]