User talk:Joel David 99

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. RRD (talk) 16:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Present

The sign "–" itself means that a player is with that club. Adding present as you did with nishu Kumar is repetition. 2018– is enough no need for 2018– present. Ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.15.128.152 (talk) 18:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions was not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:04, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gregory Nelson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Giant Snowman 07:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C.D. Concepción, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matías Sánchez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on ATK (football club). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Bengal F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Devine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Joel David 99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chennaiyin FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket seasons

Hi. Has the 2019 IPL season started yet? Do you have a crystal ball? Do you know who will play an actual game for each team?

If you do, please send me next weeks lottery numbers. Thanks. Otherwise, please stop adding 2019 teams played **for** to infoboxes. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bengaluru FC; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Aquino is not confirmed by any official sources. Please stop adding it. Coderzombie (talk) 12:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ATK wiki

Miguel Palanca is not confirmed by ATK till now and Everton Santos hasn't left ATK. Please don't change. Phantom Lancer001 (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

?

January 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Cuphead does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You did not provide an edit summary when blindly reverting my edit. Please consider doing so next time. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 06:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm Creffett. I noticed that you recently removed content from ATK (football club) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. creffett (talk) 17:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delhi Dynamos FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Emmanuel Adebayor, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NorthEast United FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pawan Kumar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andoni Ugarte

The article Andoni Ugarte has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francisco Morante Martínez

The article Francisco Morante Martínez has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tagishsimon (talk) 08:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseba Beitia

The article Joseba Beitia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

help

You used the {{Admin help}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Admin help}} tag when you have done so, and in a while an administrator will be along to help.

I deactivated the template, and added details. —usernamekiran(talk) 03:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KS Cracovia (football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rubio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francisco Morante Martínez

The article Francisco Morante Martínez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Player has not played in any fully-pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RRD (talk) 08:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseba Beitia

The article Joseba Beitia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Player has not played in any fully-pro league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RRD (talk) 08:05, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ATK (football club), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 13:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andoni Ugarte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andoni Ugarte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andoni Ugarte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MYS 77 ^✉ 16:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at ATK (football club), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notable players

Please don't add back lists of notable players that don't have clear inclusion criteria. Simply being a foreigner does not make a player notable at a club. My edit summary has a clear link to the manual of style. Fenix down (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't notable players. I am only add which foreigners are previously played for this clubs. Joel David 99 (talk) 12:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Forstly the sections you added were titled notable players, being foreign doesn't make you notable. Secondly, we don't include lists of foreign players in club articles at all for the same reason. Please don't add back again. Could you also keep the conversation on your talk page, as the notice on my talk page says I am watching your page so will see a reply here. Fenix down (talk) 14:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But there are many page like Kerala blasters add foreign players list in the club article? So I've seen this and there after I tried to add all foreign players on others club articles.Thank You Joel David 99 (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those shouldn't be there either. Think of it this way, what would Barcelona's page look like if there was a section for every foreign player? Fenix down (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamshedpur FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Calvo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC) hi please correct hyderabad location to be same on isl and isl 19-20 wiki maps and update isl logo to 200px at least 🙏 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.23.155 (talk) 17:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Bengsluru has 8 foreigners add it in table of isl 19-20 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.23.155 (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Coderzombie (talk) 14:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fran Morante (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fran Morante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fran Morante, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joel David 99! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

remove delhi word from isl 19-20 map (odisha) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.118.165 (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very sorry, please forgive me, give me another chance, extremely sorry sir,and I will not do it again with anyone Joel David 99 (talk) 06:27, 21 September 2019 (UTC) Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For context, several of the attacks in question are transliterated Hindi; for instance, "bokachoda" means "motherfucker". Beyond that, I leave any decisions about unblocking to any other admin's discretion. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been understand that I'm blocked for using slang language in Wikipedia , and I will not continue that in Wikipedia, And I will make useful contributions instead in Wikipedia Joel David 99 (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, this is not why you are blocked. Yamla (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1 I'm Blocked for attacking a person by slang language 'Bokachoda' And I have understand this I'm extremely sorry and I will not continue that in Wikipedia, And I will make useful contributions instead in Wikipedia

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27056 was submitted on Oct 09, 2019 08:08:29. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:08, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you use that language, and what will you do if tempted to do so again in the future? 331dot (talk) 09:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I using bad offensive language in Wikipedia to other editor, for that reason now I really realized that i am very sorry and in future I will not do it again with anyone. please forgive me Joel David 99 (talk) 12:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27086 was submitted on Oct 11, 2019 03:42:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27315 was submitted on Oct 27, 2019 06:46:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am want to edit good things in Wikipedia and I am not using again personal attack in Wikipedia with anyone and also I follow all rules of Wikipedia please admin forgive me Joel David 99 (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am want to edit good things in Wikipedia and I am not using again personal attack in Wikipedia with anyone and also I follow all rules of Wikipedia please admin forgive me And did not know what is the best way to get unblocked i ask many times to forgive me but it's declined so what can I do?

Decline reason:

You need to specifically explain what you did wrong, why you won't do it again, and what productive contributions you will make instead. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joel David 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am understand that I am using slang language (bokachoda) to another person for editing war,i understand it and I will not continue again with anyone God promise and I'm want to contribute correct things in Indian football related Wikipedia. Sorry please forgive me Joel David 99 (talk) 14:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think you understand English well enough to edit English Wikipedia. You think you're blocked for using slang, and your unblock request is almost incomprehensible. If you make a new unblock request, I would suggest that you put a lot more effort into it. Show us that you understand why you were blocked (it was not for using slang words) and that you can write in comprehensible English. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.