User talk:Fatam50

Fatam50, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fatam50! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maha Ali Kazmi (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maha Ali Kazmi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maha Ali Kazmi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 07:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maha Ali Kazmi (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear how she would pass WP:ENT

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maha Ali Kazmi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maha Ali Kazmi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maha Ali Kazmi has been accepted

Maha Ali Kazmi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Fatam50. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Maha Ali Kazmi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added citation. this article is not to promote the self or anyone related and all details are provided with citation and references from news articles about the topic Fatam50 (talk) 13:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maha Ali Kazmi, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue was resolved. the information with no citation was removed. hence either you can undo your complaint or i will keep undoing it Fatam50 (talk) 09:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

every single sentence in this biography has been referenced to a news paper link. everything every information is referenced with proper citation format. there is literally no objection to be made. unless you are interested in getting this page deleted on basis on some personal vendetta then please come forth and say you have an issue with the page which is personal. because technically there is noting wrong with the page. and no i am not related to the topic or the topic and this is not for the purpose of self promotion. the topic is a notable media personality. Fatam50 (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get that the BLP is referenced, but that doesn't mean I can't tag it with WP:N issues. And you really shouldn't remove maintenance tags unless the concerns are addressed. I'm not sure why you're getting defensive about this - but if you keep doing that, I might have to report it. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

we can be at all forever. you are just a bully. i have seen your history with how you nominate other pages and flag them with no solid evidence. how can you prove that fatam50 is related to the topic. can you prove that without any reasonable doubt. i would rather have this page deleted. it won't affect the notability of the person whom this topic is about as several news articles have been referenced. the topic will not cease to become a public figure. i think you are related to ISI. if you have an issue with the indian articles cited on this page please stop playing these childish games and come out clean and say you just feel like deleting this page. but please note that i will report you because your wikipedia history shows that you have a habit of bullying pakistani politicians as well. and you can keep flagging and i will keep undoing till my very last breath. Fatam50 (talk) 10:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I'm just curious how you handle a SPA who accuse me of working for ISI.—Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you can't defend your self saqib? you need other people to come and fight your fight. there are several pakistani pages you have nominated for deletion with no reason. you specifically target pakistani politicians. no you are not ISI. you are too dumb to be ISI. you're just some petty boy without a life and a horrible hateful personality who has nothing better to do than to go around messing with pages of other contributors. You aren't even important enough to respond to. and that is what i will do now. you nonexistent nobody Fatam50 (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, this is WP and we can't go around fighting our battles. That's what admins like Liz are here for—I've pinged her to handle this stuff. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sure delete the page if you like. Liz won't have to deal with the consequences. I am not related to the topic. someone else will write about the topic. but i'm also pinging you to a couple of friends of mine you will ensure that you never abuse your authority as a contributor ever again. Fatam50 (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 11:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fatam50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi please kindly unblock me as i realize that my behaviour was not right and i apologise for offending anyone. kindly unblock me and i will ensure it does not happen in the future

Decline reason:

People don't have to reveal their real name if they don't wish to. Canvassing people to support you is a no-no. Accusing others of being government agents is a serious accusation that requires serious evidence. In that same edit you also threatened to edit war. If you have a connection with this musician, the only subject you have ever contributed about, you will need to tell us what that is per WP:COI and WP:PAID. Apologizing is a start, but you will need to specifically describe your understanding of these issues and tell what steps you will take to change going forward. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom for proper chronological order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maha Ali Kazmi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maha Ali Kazmi. Thanks! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]