User talk:Fakehair

Welcome!

Hello, Fakehair! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 07:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much dream of horses. I will take your advice and join a wiki project. By the way, would you like to adopt me ? That would be great...By the way, can you assist me with the authority control section? Thanks Fakehair (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Fequiere Lucien

The article Fequiere Lucien has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Non-Dropframe _talk 08:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fequiere Lucien

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fequiere Lucien requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarchyte (talk) 08:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Volo volo de Boston

Hello Fakehair,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Volo volo de Boston for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Katrinamoris2014 (talk) 15:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volo Volo de Boston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haitian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fequiere Lucien (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fequiere Lucien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning DoubleGrazing, hope all is well with you today. I cited some reliable sources today for this article "Fequiere Lucien". Your expertise will greatly be appreciated in getting this article to the finish line.

Thank you Fakehair (talk) 04:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fakehair! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fequiere Lucien (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references cannot just be directory entries, but must be journalist-written reliable source coverage about him in real media outlets independent of his own self-published web presence.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fequiere Lucien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon Bearcat, hope you are well today. I definitely can use your assistance. The sources I cited are from reliable source coverage from real media outlets i.e The Haitian Music Archives, Music of Haiti Archives, peoplepill.com etc. Fakehair (talk) 18:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fequiere Lucien (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

there are zero reliable sources here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fequiere Lucien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fequiere Lucien has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fequiere Lucien. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theroadislong, hope you are well. I did reply to you half an hour ago. But i dont think you saw my message just yet. I really need your help with the draft: Fequiere Lucien....

Thanks Fakehair (talk) 08:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you . I was just reading them.... Fakehair (talk) 08:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fequiere Lucien has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fequiere Lucien. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fequiere Lucien (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Outside of Opa Music, none of the cited sources mention Féquière Lucien (and should it be Lucien Féquière?). Being a member of a notable band does not make an individual musician notable. In-depth coverage about him is needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fequiere Lucien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fakehair, I know you have put in a lot of effort into the article but I am not seeing how he meets notability. None of the sources cited are useful, honestly, If there is no in-depth coverage about him as an individual by multiple sources, an article is not possible. I just do not want you to waste your time (and as important the time of others). S0091 (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello S0091, hope all is well with you. I read your comment earlier. According to the Wiki's guideline that I read on the subject of notability, all that is required is at least one reliable source. All of the references can be about both the band and the singer. In fact, the singer is not just a member. He is the principal and sole owner. Based on your comment therefore, I may conclude that Facebook is notable but Mark Zuckerberg may or may not be notable. Thanks Fakehair (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited and please also see WP:BANDMEMBER. You have misinterpreted the guidelines. You are correct that sources may write about both but in-depth coverage from multiple sources about the subject is required, in this case Fequiere Lucien. Facebook is poor comparison in this instance because much has been written about Zuckerberg, but yes, there are notable companies whose CEOs or founders are not notable, likewise notable bands whose members are not notable. You can disagree but it does not make what I am telling you any less true. The draft has been declined now several times. Continuing to resubmit it without relevant improvement showing notability will lead to the draft being rejected, meaning it will not longer be considered. S0091 (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, Fakehair. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (talk) 21:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fequiere Lucien has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fequiere Lucien. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 14:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening scope_creep; hope all is well. I read your comment on thee above draft. Thank you for your comment: " It is more than borderline notable....I appreciate that. However, I did not understand your other comment: "Some of the tracks are streamed somewhat heavily..." Can you share some ideas on what that means exactly so I can correct it...

Thanks Fakehair

' Fakehair (talk) 01:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fequiere Lucien

Hello, Fakehair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fequiere Lucien, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fequiere Lucien

Hello, Fakehair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fequiere Lucien".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]