Jump to content

User talk:Death Star Central

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omar Fayed has been accepted

[edit]
Omar Fayed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Smith (aerospace engineer) has been accepted

[edit]
Robert Smith (aerospace engineer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Duritskaya has been accepted

[edit]
Anna Duritskaya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 13:49, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aly Muhammad Aga Khan (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 10:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Death Star Central! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 10:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoox (company) has been accepted

[edit]
Zoox (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ShunDream (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breakthrough Enceladus (February 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Breakthrough Initiatives. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Why isn't this a section on the Initiatives article first? per WP:WITHIN?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Panagopoulos has been accepted

[edit]
Alexander Panagopoulos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aly Muhammad Aga Khan has been accepted

[edit]
Aly Muhammad Aga Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhian Singh Dogra has been accepted

[edit]
Dhian Singh Dogra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 18:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breakthrough Enceladus (September 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Breakthrough Initiatives. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 21:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Smith (aerospace engineer) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Smith (aerospace engineer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Smith (aerospace engineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zoox (company) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoox (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoox (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northwest Africa 801 has been accepted

[edit]
Northwest Africa 801, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Sagotreespirit (talk) 05:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Berglund (Corporate Executive) has been accepted

[edit]
Thomas Berglund (Corporate Executive), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 05:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ashok Hotel has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashok Hotel. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karan Singh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Independent and National Conference (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashok Hotel has been accepted

[edit]
Ashok Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Breakthrough Enceladus concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Breakthrough Enceladus, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breakthrough Enceladus has been accepted

[edit]
Breakthrough Enceladus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breakthrough Enceladus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Discover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dogra dynasty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lars Schmidt (producer) has been accepted

[edit]
Lars Schmidt (producer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kristian Schmidt has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kristian Schmidt. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristian Schmidt (April 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunday Times Rich List 1989 has been accepted

[edit]
Sunday Times Rich List 1989, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 13:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you're creating other STRL articles, {{Sunday Times Rich List}} will take some labour away. I just created it. Please don;t forget to update it if creating more Fiddle Faddle 14:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your 2019 edit to Cascais

[edit]

Hi. I believe that you edited Cascais in 2019 with the following: "Prince Juan of Spain, Count of Barcelona (son of the King Alfonso XIII of Spain and Princess Victoria Eugenie of Battenberg), the designated heir to the Spanish throne, also lived in the municipality of Cascais with his family. In his childhood, King Juan Carlos I of Spain lived in the same parent's house at Estoril, while his youngest brother, Prince Alfonso of Bourbon, died there, being originally buried at the municipal cemetery of Cascais." I am having trouble understanding exactly what this means, particularly the reference to "same parent's house". Could you rephrase? Thanks.Roundtheworld (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not write the above paragraph. That edit was added 16:30, 13 December 2017 by Anjo-sozinhol, as listed in the article’s revision history. My first edit to the Casais article was 09:52, 15 July 2019. If I however, had to guess what was meant by the line seeming to cause confusion, it would be that Juan Carlos had lived in the same house as his parents in Estoril. That is however a guess. I have though now gone and rephrased that paragraph so less confusions will exist, and wording better suits and focuses on the topic of his exile, as opposed to the parental abode of a minor. Death Star Central (talk) 15:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sunday Times Rich List 1989 for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunday Times Rich List 1989 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday Times Rich List 1989 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 14:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Draper (August 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Virgin Records. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Draper has limited notability in his own right. Unless, of course, you can find more material about him
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 08:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kristian Schmidt

[edit]

Hello, Death Star Central. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kristian Schmidt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roheen Berry (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kashmir conflict. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Jammu and Kashmir (princely state). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe I have violated wikipedia policy in what I wrote, that I believe was adequately sourced too and thus have written a deeper reply to this in the talk section of the Kashmir conflict article. Please let's continue this discussion there: Talk:Kashmir_conflict#Ankit_Love's_claim_to_be_the_sovereign_Maharaja_of_Jammu_and_Kashmir_in_United_Kingdom_politics Death Star Central (talk) 22:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Did your sources put this in a "Kashmir conflict" context? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well I believe yes, and have written a longer reply the Kashmir conflict talk page, and look forward to your reply there. Why else would the sources report a claim to sovereignty if there was no relation to conflict? There are many sources on this story, here is one other that is perhaps more explicit in reference to conflict in CatchNews which reports the following "Love claims to be the \'exiled Emperor of Jammu and Kashmir\'He wants to get his princely state out of the clutches of \'India and Pakistan\'s illegal occupation\'" I believe that is a quite a clear reference to conflict. Death Star Central (talk) 23:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roheen Berry (May 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth II

[edit]

Howdy. Would appreciate it if you would stop putting the coronation image in the lead. Instead go to the article's talkpage & get a consensus for what you're proposing. GoodDay (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 London mayoral election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jenny Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allegra Mostyn-Owen (May 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Novem Linguae was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This one is very close. I judge these 2 sources to pass GNG: [1][2]. You should find one more source that is significant coverage of Mostyn-Owen (multiple paragraphps of detail about her specifically) and also independent (not written by her), add the source, then resubmit. Feel free to ping me for a fast review.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
–Novem Linguae (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allegra Mostyn-Owen has been accepted

[edit]
Allegra Mostyn-Owen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roheen Berry

[edit]
Notice

The article Roheen Berry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Notability can't be inherited through companies bought or elected at.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Nomadicghumakkad Thank you kindly for this note and your concerns. I have now listed this article for a deletion discussion, to hopefully get a few more thoughts on the matter. Please do write you feelings their as well: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roheen_Berry. Kind Regards, --Death Star Central (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Death Star Central, I just left a comment about the existing draft. But you are right, AFD will bring a broader opinion. You could have also gone to WP:TEA for more advise though. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PancakeSwap (June 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Celestina007 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please read WP:YFA and re-write this.
Celestina007 (talk) 00:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nitesh003. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 Indian presidential election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Nitesh003 (talk) 01:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Simon Draper

[edit]

Hello, Death Star Central. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simon Draper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roheen Berry

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Death Star Central. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roheen Berry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PancakeSwap

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Death Star Central. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PancakeSwap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Einer has been accepted

[edit]
Roberta Einer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Princess of Ara 19:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhim Singh

[edit]

Why not start discussion on this article's talk page first, reach consensus there prior to deleting?

Since you are the one re-adding contested content, I strongly suggest you open the discussion on the talkpage and gain consensus. At the moment I am strongly considering taking this to the appropriate noticeboard. Kleuske (talk) 19:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:Kleuske Why only considering? Why don't we do both? Please do take it there, I believe a good discussion is what wikipedia is all about. I sincerely back your approach! But do you really feel deleting the word "conflict" from this Bhim Singh article in relation to the Kashmir conflict with the explanation as that it is "controversial" by the previous one editor user:JaggaDaaku is not an inherent violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, especially considering that thus far the, one contesting editor, is only editing India related articles since about a month ago? --Death Star Central (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Van Cleef (August 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This article might have potential but it needs to be expanded, and ideally there should be more sources than this.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 05:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Van Cleef (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Njd-de was:
This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– NJD-DE (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pavel Antov (December 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:GNG, only coverage cited relates to his death.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alfred Van Cleef

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Death Star Central. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alfred Van Cleef, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alfred Van Cleef

[edit]

Hello, Death Star Central. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alfred Van Cleef".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pavel Antov

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Death Star Central. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pavel Antov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harsh Dev Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhim Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jammu and Kashmir lithium reserves has been accepted

[edit]
Jammu and Kashmir lithium reserves, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes (talk / cont) 18:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Death_Star_Central&oldid=1258289890"