User talk:Chilum aw charrs

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Chilum aw charrs, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Chilum aw charrs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fardeen Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Neelkamala (talk) 03:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feroz Khan

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Feroz Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Neelkamala (talk) 03:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Salah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bosnian and Ablution

Fardeen Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Descent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Fardeen Khan". Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Forced image size and Wikipedia:Image use policy#Displayed image size. In general images should not be forced to display at a certain size. There are of course exceptions for things like maps or panoramic pictures but in general the format is not to make them smaller or larger than the default. If you are finding that the images are too large for your liking then go to your preferences and change the default. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The articles mosque and Islam do not need a very large showcase of large size images, everything must be considered to determine the more appropriate sizes. Also, many people around the world (i.e. 1.2 billion Indians in India, 180 million in Pakistan, 150 million in Bangladesh, etc.) still have very slow internet speed and they who are English speaking cannot view pages as a result of this. Look here, even Britannica uses small size images. If someone is interested in the image they can click on it to enlarge it. The great majority of people don't visit Islam article to see images.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that both the Islam and mosque article has far too many pictures. The number of images should be reduced but the size should be left as a default. If you think that the default is too large then it should be discussed at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images or Wikipedia talk:Image use policy. Right now the consensus is that images should be at the default of 220px. By discussing it at the talk page you may be able to get consensus changed. However, going against consensus will just lead to other editors reverting you and in the long run may end up with you being blocked for disruption. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the history of Islam article, those images were small sized for years until you came and changed them to bigger sizes. I was trying to be helpful and explain to you important fact that alot of people in the West don't know. If you visit Wikitravel, they reached a consensus that all images be as small as possible due to slow internet speed in many countries around the world. Especially people who use public internet cafes to access Wikipedia.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you are wrong about me making them bigger. For the most part I make pictures smaller and less often restore the default size from a smaller image. This is the English Wikipedia and what they do at Britannica or Wikitravel has no bearing on what happens here. You have to understand that we operate by WP:Consensus and you are going against that which will just lead to other editors reverting you. As I said before both those articles have too many images but I also know that trying to remove any will also lead to a reversion. Again you need to try and change consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images or Wikipedia talk:Image use policy. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:Image use policy#Displayed image size, it reads "In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good reason to do so: some users have small screens or need to configure their systems to display large text; "forced" large thumbnails can leave little width for text, making reading difficult. [....] Sometimes a picture may benefit from a size other than the default. This policy that you directed me to is against large size images.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Pashtun sentiment

I see that you have an interest in Pashtun related articles. If you are interested, please take time to review an article I have created recently, Anti-Pashtun sentiment. I would appreciate if you have any feedback to give and also some good sources that could be used to develop the article. PS: I originally found you here, which is on my watchlist, and was wondering, why do you think current Afghan ministers and members of the cabinet should be listed on there (wouldn't that be more suited to a political template?). Also, if you are interested, you may want to become a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pashtun. Thanks and regards, Mar4d (talk) 01:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gilgit–Baltistan

I do not think Marxists.org meets WP:RS. Can you try to find a better source? Darkness Shines (talk) 20:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source: MECW Volume 18, p. 40; Written: in July and the first 10 days of August 1857; First published: in The New American Cyclopaedia, Vol. I, 1858; Transcribed: Andy Blunden, 2001; Proofread: and corrected by Andy Blunden in February 2005.

Review of J W Kaye’s The Afghan War, by Engels

“

Afghanistan, an extensive country of Asia, north-west of India. It lies between Persia and the Indies, and in the other direction between the Hindu Kush and the Indian Ocean. It formerly included the Persian provinces of Khorassan and Kohistan, together with Herat, Beluchistan, Cashmere, and Sinde, and a considerable part of the Punjab.

”

-- Friedrich Engels

[1]--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Shere Khan (disambiguation) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 23:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shere Khan (disambiguation)

Please don't convert disambiguation pages to redirects unless there is only a single entry on the page. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 23:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It's only one name but pronounced differently depending on regional languages. In this case only one page is sufficient, otherwise it confuses readers and difficult to find what they're searching for.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 23:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

May i ask why you deleted some references in this edit? Pass a Method talk 00:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's re-arranging references not deleting. Examine things carefully before you accuse me.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted one of the quotes in the references. Pass a Method talk 00:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which one?--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sue Hellett Pass a Method talk 00:40, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took her down to the Shia section. The sources are excessive.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 00:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this your first wikipedia account? Pass a Method talk 12:16, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you, and why are you asking me personal and off the topic questions?--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits seem familiar. Is this your first wikipedia account? Pass a Method talk 00:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Focus on the content not on editors.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sockpuppetry deserves "focus". Your refusal to answer the question merely raises suspicions. For the third time, is this your first wikipedia account? Pass a Method talk 00:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You must be really bored. Why don't you explain first if this is your only wikipedia account? Good luck with catching of sockpuppets.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 00:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop your POV-pushing, unsourced vandalism on Taliban. Thank you.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, are you a former banned editor? It seems likely.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He's probably a sock of User:Lagoo sab. Pass a Method talk 11:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced vandalism on Taliban, what the fukk is that? Who are you? Are you two using other names in wikipedia? Both of you are asking me off topic questions. If you're gays looking for partner, just wanna say that I'm not. I love women.--Chilum aw charrs (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chilum aw charrs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what the fuck?... what the fuck is goin' on? I'm improving articles and some crazy mentally frustrated person blocked me. Don't yaw niggaz have anything better to do with yo life than to be doing this BS? Yaw niggaz must be depressed n' shit, hahaha.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

..and due to the abusive nature of your request

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by using the unblock ticket request system, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

(✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]