User talk:Burn12121212

Concern regarding Draft:Chroococcidiopsidales

Hello, Burn12121212. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chroococcidiopsidales, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bold, revert, discuss

You may not be familiar with one of the key principles of Wikipedia, which is this: you may certainly make additions to articles but the counterpoint is that another editor may question the addition and revert it, then open a discussion on it to work towards a consensus. See policy WP:BRD. Until that discussion has reached a consensus, you should not simply reinstate the challenged edit: to do so is considered wp:edit warrring.

You added content to Tragedy of the commons, which I reverted and opened a discussion at talk:Tragedy of the commons#"Serves as a pretext" (bold, revert, discuss). I guess you didn't see it? Please do not just add the same text again. The essence of your addition is valid and should be in the article: the only issue is that it needs to be expressed more dispassionately. Let's work together to resolve this. Please contribute to the article talk page. A good start would be to quote the relevant passage from the journal article. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I added my references and suggestions in the talk page I agree that I need to calm down my passionate writing, thanks for the advice, hope you find useful the information we discussed. Grettings --Burn12121212 (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, sorry, I didn't intend to question your writing style, only that encyclopedic writing has to be as disinterested and uninvolved as we can make it, recognising of course that if we didn't care about the topic, we wouldn't bother to contribute on it. So if I seemed to question your good faith in any way, it certainly wasn't intended. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 08:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Burn12121212! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC) (I see nobody welcomed you.)[reply]

Signing your contributions to talk pages

Note that the four tildes to sign normally goes at end of your contribution, like this: --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Carlos Loret de Mola, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]