User talk:Brainiac Adam
Help
[edit]That TyrannoRanger menace of The Mr. Men Wiki got me blocked for a year and is so sorry. I want my IP address to have changed before next month and how do they actually change. Please expand the ban to 6 months. --Unregistered user, 8:57, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Well you shouldn't have been messing with him or the wiki. If I tell him, he won't listen, so there is no point.--Brainiac Adam (talk) 13:38, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
I have given CuriousWikian590 a level 3 harassment warning. You have said he was a sock ... of what user? Can you say? Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- I can't remember him having a wikipedia account here. I never saw him but he did say he was hated on Wikipedia, plus he's harrassing me about Youtube and it was driving me crazy. I think he's a ban evader anyway. I apologize if I wasted your time but he has been harrassing me.--Brainiac Adam (talk) 20:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm investigating this. AGK [•] 20:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ok. Again, if I wasted your time then I apologize, if not, great! Thanks again for your help. :) --Brainiac Adam (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Wikian590 doesn't seem to be a sock. I will defer to Daniel Case on how to deal with the harassment, and consider this matter to be resolved (absent further developments). AGK [•] 22:03, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Alright. Thank you very much for your help. :) --Brainiac Adam (talk) 23:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin, nor am I involved in your particular issue -- but I saw your pleas while I was looking at something else on SPI. You should consider looking into whether or not you can/should file an ANI. That is probably your only course of action if you're being harassed. Good luck. Erikeltic (Talk) 00:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Alright. Thank you for your advice. I deeply appreciate it. :)--Brainiac Adam (talk) 15:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin, nor am I involved in your particular issue -- but I saw your pleas while I was looking at something else on SPI. You should consider looking into whether or not you can/should file an ANI. That is probably your only course of action if you're being harassed. Good luck. Erikeltic (Talk) 00:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Alright. Thank you very much for your help. :) --Brainiac Adam (talk) 23:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Wikian590 doesn't seem to be a sock. I will defer to Daniel Case on how to deal with the harassment, and consider this matter to be resolved (absent further developments). AGK [•] 22:03, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ok. Again, if I wasted your time then I apologize, if not, great! Thanks again for your help. :) --Brainiac Adam (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm investigating this. AGK [•] 20:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- The recent attacks by CuriousWikian590 seem to follow from posts to your talk page in January by 175.38.165.50 and in April by 58.110.240.225. This user has a long history of troublesome editing, from over 20 IP addresses (counting only the ones I know about) and at least two accounts, probably more. I have probably been more involved than anyone else in blocking this editor, so if you get any more trouble from the same person please feel welcome to contact me on my talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah he has been causing a lot of trouble on the Mr. Men wiki as well recently too. Thanks for your advice. I will talk to you for help if CuriousWikian590 and other accounts messes with me again. :) Thanks a lot.--Brainiac Adam (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Sarah Davison has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fiddle Faddle 12:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Fiddle Faddle 12:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Iain Lauchlan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fiddle Faddle 12:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Fiddle Faddle 12:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sagittarius (astrology) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {http://www.astrology.com.au/astrology/12-signs-of-the-zodiac/sagittarius.html
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Request source for edit
[edit]Please cite the source you used to make this edit. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Brainiac Adam. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your edit to "Scorpio (astrology)"
[edit]In this edit you changed the dates for which the sun passes through the Scorpio astrological sign. There was a citation in the article to The Astrology Bible: The Definitive Guide to the Zodiac to support the dates that were previously in the article. Unfortunately I don't have a copy of that book. You must have read the book to justify the change; would you please provide a quote showing how the book presents this information? Jc3s5h (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Never mind. I found a better source. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Brainiac Adam. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Fake Ads
[edit]Hi, to boost your petition you could add links to it in the comments section of the relevant videos on YouTube, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi there. That is what I have been doing. To the people who was sick of the false advertising, I told them to sign and share it, and so far, it's going up slowly but surely. I still have a long way to go, but I'm making slightly better progress. I still need loads more in order to make the difference. --Brainiac Adam (talk) 20:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)