User talk:Bf0325

Welcome!

Hello, Bf0325, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Balakliia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Lotje (talk) 10:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bf0325 (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Bf0325! Your additions to 2022 Ukrainian Kharkiv counteroffensive have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly I do not know whether I should say thank you or not, but unless you can enforce all your points onto ALL users, otherwise I can only see your suggestions are not very enforceable. I do agree that if I need to quote, it has to be with quotation marks, but unfortunately, even I do cite with quotation, later on another user may edit it and now the quotation is without quotation marks, and if I were to do what you suggest to just maintain that, then I need to monitor the page permanently---If you were me, do you have 24/7/365 to do so on EVERY page?

I do not use copyrighted images, but you'd better talk to someone else---The only time I did something to an image was I removed one, and that's because the factual error was so obvious that the picture was taken from a place actually under Russian control and simply not closer to one of the cities Ukraine just recaptured.

I'd try my best and strive to do what I can to edit and polish the entries and do a better job on citing quotations and paraphrasing, and definitely I won't plagiarize(but I won't be able to control what other users are doing, otherwise I may have to do a lot of those "undos" or even permanently monitor the pages), but unless you can define how small was that "small" amount, otherwise your suggestion is still not enforceable, and this is unfair to literally the majority of contributors. Bf0325 (talk) 02:46, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nick Chinlund, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I would additionally recommend familiarizing yourself with WP:RSP#IMDb. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 03:47, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think a better way could be why don't you find one reliable source and show us irrefutably why Nick Chinlund was born or simply not born in 1961?

I do not need you to lecture me on citing sources whereas you probably do better than me!

Only if you do sth better than me then I would say thank you, otherwise unless you also lecture this on other people, I won't tip a hat to you! Bf0325 (talk) 00:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, I've a warning for you---If you've questions on anybody adding or editing a person's date of birth or even the birth year, but do not give a very convincing reason for why we should not even put down birth year or even a date, then I'm afraid you may have similar doubts on literally hundreds or thousands of similar entries...and your approach will simply ruffle a lot of feathers too!

Plus, quit saying "I would additionally recommend familiarizing yourself with WP:RSP#IMDb. "---Even if you're a moderator or somebody else, that is condescending, because who are you to tell someone what to do in this case? Why can't you show others how to edit an entry yourself?

Therefore, YOU MUST LISTEN TO ME AND STOP REPLYING TO ME, and edit the entry or entries yourself(should you find similar issues with other entries that you may have different opinions from numerous other users)! Bf0325 (talk) 00:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]