User talk:Ballal2003

Welcome!

Hello, Ballal2003, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 22:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vishal Devrukhkar

Hi, yes you are allowed to make a pages created section on your user page. Thanks for creating the article, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantic306 sir, I’ve noticed that some of the articles I created from my region, such as those on Vishal Devrukhkar (which takes 24 hours to appear in search results) and Kailash Waghmare, aren’t showing up in Google search results, even though they are in Article space. Additionally, the draft I edited, Draft:Vaibhav Palhade, has been pending review for a while now.Can you help me understand why this might be happening? I’d appreciate any advice you can give on how to improve visibility. Ballal2003 (talk) 19:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Atlantic306 sir, could you please guide me on how to check what user rights I have on Wikipedia? Also, I would like to know how I can participate in AFC reviews. Thank you!(Ballal2003 (talk) 18:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Articles only appear in Google search results if they have been reviewed by a new page reviewer. Vishal Devruhkar has been reviewed the others haven't been marked as reviewed. AfC submissions can take up to 3 months to be reviewed. If you go to your contributions page at the bottom is a link to edit count which will have details of your user rights. You are not experienced enough for AfC reviewing as per the qualifications detailed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lokshahi News (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of these sources seem to work?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lokshahi News and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kailash Waghmare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kailash Waghmare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kailash Waghmare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 08:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav Palhade (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vaibhav Palhade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ballal2003! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thilsebatti (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 15:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]