User talk:Ashleythesciencenerd

Welcome!

Hi Ashleythesciencenerd! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Zefr (talk) 00:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Yuriy Voronyy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Yuriy Voronyy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 01:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yuriy Voronyy

Hello, Ashleythesciencenerd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuriy Voronyy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Combination syndrome has been accepted

Combination syndrome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuriy Voronyy (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Plenty of unsourced statements. Needs many more sources and all statements properly supported.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuriy Voronyy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 03:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashleythesciencenerd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 03:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuriy Voronyy

Hello, Ashleythesciencenerd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuriy Voronyy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy

Hello Ashleythesciencenerd,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Darth Stabro, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Preventive mastectomy. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Darth Stabro}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 02:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to search for existing articles

Hi Ashleythesciencenerd,

I'm always happy to see new editors take an interest in the chemical and medical areas. However, I see lots of your recent article creations are on topics for which we already have articles. That wastes lots of editors' time in cleanup. It seems like many of your articles are fairly formulaic, as if you have a template or are using some other semi-automated writing tool. Those types of approaches seem especially prone to writing articles without attention to what already exists on Wikipedia. So instead, please look for articles on a topic where you can add new details before dumping a whole new article. See Wikipedia:Content forks for more information. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 06:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMacks,

Thanks for your feedback! I’ve been using the Wikipedia "Requested articles" pages as a guide to find topics for new articles. I was under the impression that these were already filtered to avoid duplicating existing content, but I’ll definitely take extra care to ensure that any articles I create are unique and not redundant. I appreciate the suggestions, and I’m always happy to learn how to contribute better!

Best,

Ashleythesciencenerd Ashleythesciencenerd (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi. Please be very careful to make sure references that you insert are real, The references you inserted into canfosfamide appear not to be actual references but rather to be AI generated. Boghog (talk) 21:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with content you added to BAY 12-9566 - text supported by faked references. Don't do that. Innerstream (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Just so you know, the English Wikipedia uses Sentence case for article titles and section headings. This isn't a big deal, because someone will come along and fix it later, but if you follow the convention, then it could save a little time later. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine is where folks interested in medicine-related articles hang out, and you're welcome to join us. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]