User talk:Androstachys

Ernest Coffin - English illustrator

There are many of his illustrations on the web - eg at http://www.flickr.com/photos/36844288@N00/4266687091/in/photostream/ - but finding information on him is difficult, even his birth and death dates don't crop up. Does anybody know anything more about him? Androstachys (talk) 21:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of a challenge as you said not much comes up on a google search. Now this is a bit of original research and some of the may be wrong but I assume it could be Ernest Maitland T Coffin 1868-1944. He appears in the 1912 Census in Westminster where is listed as aged 43 and born in Stoke, Devon and describes himself as an artist. The Ernest Maitland T Coffin birth is in 1868 which is roughly right and the district is Plymouth which include Stoke Damarall. His wife is Almeida Coffin aged 38 and he says they have been married 10 years, although the only marriage that matches is in 1910 Ernest Maitland T Coffin and Almeida Roberts which was only a year before not ten! An Ernest M Coffin died aged 75 in Surrey in 1944. The 1891 Census shows a 22 year old Ernest M T Coffin as a Student of Medicine living with his parents in Hampstead, London, his father Thomas Walker Coffin was a surgeon. The early 1871 census shows him as two-year old at Molesworth Terrace, Stoke Damarel, Devon. All guess work. MilborneOne (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valuable contributions

I was led to this page as I found some valuable contributions made by this editor, the first of which was Bamboesberg. Not an expert on the user's total output, but a ban may be detrimental to wikipedia. JMK (talk) 05:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editor is currently editing peaceably under another account. Hesperian 06:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing on Commons

{{admin help}} I have been blocked from contributing to Commons with the following message You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: Your IP address, 41.213.126.5, has been automatically identified as a tor exit node. Editing through tor is blocked to prevent abuse. Can anyone help? Androstachys (talk) 05:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(non admin) I suppose the first question is: Are you actually using a TOR (onion network)? Sven Manguard _Talk 06:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - the first answer is I go through a large and well-known service provider and I doubt that they have suddenly started using Tor (which I have not known about previously). Second answer/question is that if WP are happy with the status quo (whatever it is!), why is it Commons that have a problem? Androstachys (talk) 07:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are not getting blocked on English Wikipedia because you are in the ipblock-exempt usergroup (so this problem must have happened here before). I have posted a note on the Commons admin noticeboard on your behalf. They should get back to you shortly. Regards. 7 08:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also - posting your IP address here is your own choice, but it may cause you privacy concerns. If you would like your IP to be redacted (either now or after your issue on commons is fixed) please add the adminhelp template back in and let us know. 7 08:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should now be able to edit. Commons admin report they have included you on the exemption as has been done on en.wiki. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sorting this out - it is much appreciated!! Androstachys (talk) 12:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paddlefish

Hi Androstachys. Can you please cite the information you added to paddlefish and fish ladder concerning the influence of metal in concrete ladders? What you say sounds plausible, and there are references on the web to paddlefish having difficulties negotiating ladders. But I cannot find a source concerning metal in concrete.. --Epipelagic (talk) 10:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epipelagic, The information was from a National Geographic documentary on American paddlefish, featuring Zeb Hogan. Androstachys (talk) 13:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2008 Coventry Airport collision

The article 2008 Coventry Airport collision has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to meet the WP:AIRCRASH criteria for a stand-alone article, also WP:NOTNEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008 Coventry Airport collision for deletion

The article 2008 Coventry Airport collision is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Coventry Airport collision until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Roger Broders02.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roger Broders02.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Gil Elvgren04.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gil Elvgren04.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Gil Elvgren01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gil Elvgren01.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Avatar (2009 film). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly recommend that you read WP:OWNERSHIP carefully and that you refrain from posting irrelevant warnings on my talk page. Androstachys (talk) 21:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the warning you are more than welcome to delete it. It is your Talk page, after all. Doniago (talk) 21:39, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pipsqueak

The shell doesn't belong on a dab page without an article to link to. That leaves the dab page with only one link, so I've reverted it to the redirect it used to be. If an article on Pipsqueak, the shell, is written, or even a section in another article, then by all means re-create the dab page. PamD (talk) 08:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GFAJ-1

Please do not delete the extremophiles category from the GFAJ-1 article. Thriving in a salty and arsenic-rich environment, makes it an extremophile as well as halophile. Thank you. BatteryIncluded (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have not deleted the category extremophiles, but simply subdivided it. Extremophiles simply was too extended a category and creating sub-categories that are more precise in describing why an organism is an extremophile, can only lead to a clearer picture. cheers Androstachys (talk) 15:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you.BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Daniël Cornelis Boonzaaier00.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Daniël Cornelis Boonzaaier00.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! thank you Androstachys (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

old bicycle poster

awesome. Decora (talk) 00:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. mgiganteus1 (talk) 20:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Frederick Cooke

I cleaned some copied and pasted text from this article as it was from a non-commercial (NC) source. NC-related licenses are not compatible with Wikipedia. See WP:COPYPASTE for more guidance. Any questions, let me know.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks good, there are some non-coinincidental matches like titles, etc. but it looks good.--NortyNort (Holla) 09:12, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Actiniopteris radiata02.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Actiniopteris radiata02.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could Rhapta have been in modern-day Mozambique?

Androstachys - I am copying this piece (below) into your personal Talk-File because it does not look as if people visit the Periplus ... Talk-File all that often. Regards, David McNaughton; E-mail: DLMcN@yahoo.com

- . - . - . - Could Rhapta have been in modern-day Mozambique?

Does anyone have access to a copy of the "Periplus"? - either in the original Greek or in translation?

Carl Peters implies that it states that Rhapta lay, not at the mouth of its river, but some distance upstream, adding that this requirement would fit Quelimane quite well. But is he quoting the "Periplus" correctly?

Incidentally, remembering the successful Phoenician circumnavigation of Africa in 600 BC, it is by no means impossible that subsequent travellers would have ventured as far as the mouth of the Zambesi (or even beyond) - at the time when the "Periplus" was being compiled. I used to work in the Zimbabwean Meteorological Office, and can confirm that alternations in the coastal wind pattern did facilitate two-way journeys there. - . - . - . - --DLMcN (talk) 18:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Micronecta scholtzi

On 10 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Micronecta scholtzi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the penis of the Lesser Water Boatman Micronecta scholtzi creates mating calls of 99.2 decibels, making it the loudest animal on earth, scaled for its size? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solar Spark Lighter

The article Solar Spark Lighter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to confirm notability by reliable sources. Possible spam (ref inclusion at Survival kit)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Haruth (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Androstachys (talk) 07:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

indef blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as the latest (and still disruptive)^{[citation needed]} incarnation of community-banned user Paul venter / Rotational. Hesperian 00:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tsk tsk.... time has not improved the intelligence nor wit of you and your sidekick, Rkitko. Androstachys (talk) 08:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pgallert (talk) 10:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 14:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aussenkehr Desert Extreme Trail Run00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mountain Club of South Africa members

Category:Mountain Club of South Africa members, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletions

I have nominated 20 articles you created for speedy deletion as articles created by a sock of a banned user. I'll get to the rest later. Here's the first batch:

MT_Phoenix_(1974)

Getaway_(magazine)

Asthenosoma_marisrubri

Ernest_Walbourn

Karl_Heinrich_Mertens

Thomas_Pearson_Stokoe

Croton_gratissimus

Telomere_(insect_morphology)

Telomere_(disambiguation)

Paramere

Archipendulum

Anton_Rehmann

Our_South_African_Birds

Alice_Pegler

Actiniopteris_radiata

Pilifer

~~If you wish to contest deletion of any of these, you may click the link at the top of the article and follow the directions given.~~ - SummerPhD (talk) 03:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Climbing terms

Category:Climbing terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Mass-penny

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mass-penny, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/dictionary/index.cfm?id=34779. As a copyright violation, Mass-penny appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mass-penny has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mass-penny and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Mass-penny with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mass-penny.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Atlantima (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Thomas Pearson Stokoe01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Pearson Stokoe01.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Getaway (magazine)00.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Getaway (magazine)00.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Climbing terms

Category:Climbing terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Frederick Roberts, 1st Earl Roberts

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Frederick Sleigh Roberts, 1st Earl Roberts by John Singer Sargent.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Makita logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Makita logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kara Cooney for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kara Cooney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kara Cooney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 18:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Comprehensive Microbial Resource

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Comprehensive Microbial Resource requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TritonsRising (talk) 20:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Will Owen22.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Will Owen22.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Personal transporters has been nominated for discussion

Category:Personal transporters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:French Engineering Works00.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:French Engineering Works00.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thermomicroscopy has been nominated for merging

Category:Thermomicroscopy has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bohemian chemists has been nominated for merging

Category:Bohemian chemists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frans Oerder09b.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frans Oerder09b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sugar barons has been nominated for merging

Category:Sugar barons has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Three Peaks Challenge

The article Three Peaks Challenge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only sources I can find are a primary source website and this article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Big Money Threepwood (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gil Elvgren01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gil Elvgren01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EcoLon

The article EcoLon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPRODUCT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B3251 (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Table Mountain Challenge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Table Mountain Challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table Mountain Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SL93 (talk) 22:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]