User talk:Alexispapp

June 2021

Your recent editing history at Democratic Party (United States) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
-- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Republican Party (United States). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Democratic Party (United States), you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What did I vadalise, I just added in the description of the party that a main ideology is social democracy which is true considering sources from both spectrums of politics. Alexispapp (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice about American politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

I have reverted all of your edits. If you change the description of a party's political views again, I will report you for edit warring. Get consensus on the articles' talk pages. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had reverted two political parties views in the past, if you want me to provide evidence for why these three parties take these certain political positions I can do this(old democratic-republican party, democratic party, progressive party of tdr). Also please note that this changes were made in order to prevent miss information. Alexispapp (talk) 20:18, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You'd done this with three political parties (Republican, Progressive, and Democratic-Republican), and I've reverted all three. Wikipedia is governed by consensus. Controversial changes like this need to be discussed on an article's talk page (such as Talk:Democratic Party (United States). You're welcome to post at any of these articles' talk pages, but first please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources (specifically section WP:PARTISAN), to understand why citing Ben Shapiro is unlikely to be successful. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also cited the source about liberalism in the social democracy section (it was about Obama), hence I am saying this ideology is proven by both spectrums. Alexispapp (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your perspective, although I disagree. However, you don't need to convince me. You need to convince a consensus of Wikipedia editors. For your convenience:

Again, please take a look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources before posting at any of those, as well as Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you don't want me to do it please change the ideology of the tdr progressive party and the old democratic-republican party to prevent miss information. If you have researched teddy's policies you will see that they weren't left wing at all, in fact they were centrist policies. About the second party I mentioned respectively please have a look at Thomas Jefferson's and James Madison's policies. Alexispapp (talk) 20:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to change anything. You shouldn't change anything either. Instead, you should discuss this with other editors. I've shown you the talk pages to do that at. Some of them (maybe all, I haven't checked) have had past discussions on this topic. You should read those too. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:29, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They haven't had one, I just created a new discussion on this topic and hopefully somebody notices and changes it. Thank you for helping me though. Alexispapp (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for listening. :) Also, please check out WP:INDENT to see how to make it clear what you're replying to. (So far, I've been indenting your posts for you.) -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:35, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Progressive Party (United States, 1912). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, Alexispapp, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Panathaole (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OP BINS (February 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alexispapp! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hi Alexispapp! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 23:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Alexispapp reported by User:Taxin609 (Result: ). Thank you. Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 23:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Alexispapp. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page National Creation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Since you stated you are a member of the party, that definitely creates a conflict of interest for you with the party's article. —C.Fred (talk) 23:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your conflict of interest, you should refrain from editing the article directly, and you need to cite reliable sources for the material you add. I have reverted your unsourced additions of party ideology. —C.Fred (talk) 00:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at National Creation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alexispapp

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Alexispapp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 13:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:OP BINS

Hello, Alexispapp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OP BINS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:OP BINS

Hello, Alexispapp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OP BINS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]