User talk:Alex.zakrewsky

Welcome!

Hi Alex.zakrewsky! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Vsmith (talk) 11:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Centroid

How to get your centroid calculation into Wikipedia: publish it in a reputable (preferably peer-reviewed) journal, and then suggest on the relevant Talk page that someone include a mention to it. --Macrakis (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that my centroid calculation is appropriate subject matter for an academic journal-- it does not demonstrate any new mathematical technique or add to any theoretical debate. It is meant only to provide a running, annual synopsis of changes in the settlement patterns of the United States for those interested in the topic. Alex.zakrewsky (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, then, you could convince some organization (the Census Bureau? the New York Times?) to use your calculation -- with credit. Otherwise, this falls under our original research policy. --Macrakis (talk) 22:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a couple of news articles/releases about my centroid calculation, the first from 2011 and one more current:

https://www.stltoday.com/news/state-and-regional/missouri/how-a-n-j-man-put-plato-mo-on-the-map-before-the-census-bureau/article_05d196d7-4ba5-5ab0-95a8-9e850e5d00f1.html

https://www.stltoday.com/pr/news/new-2020-united-states-census-estimate-calculation-names-wright-county-as-nations-center-of-population/article_e5cc1a94-14d8-11ec-9372-47665c0fb778.html

Please feel free to reference them. Thanks!Alex.zakrewsky (talk) 02:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The second one (from the STL) is not useful, because it is not an independent source -- you wrote it yourself. The first one is a good start, but it's presented as a human interest story after the official centroid had been announced. I think you'll have a hard time convincing Wikipedians that this is encyclopedic content unless you have some more authoritative statements. You're obviously a serious person and you've done a reasonable calculation, but I'm just not sure that this belongs in Wikipedia. --Macrakis (talk) 14:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many news outlets are reporting on my 2020 US population centroid estimate and other commentary I made regarding the new population center and its recent movement. Here are two of them:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/us-population-center-plato-missouri_l_619287a8e4b05e93cbb35c2c https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/national/article255863976.html

Best, Alex.zakrewsky (talk) 00:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your estimate is not notable and worth covering; nor is the estimate itself authoritative reliable source for the population center. We use the data from the Census Bureau as it becomes available.

Please stop your repeated attempts at self-promotion. You're embarrassing yourself. TJRC (talk) 01:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Associated Press has a different opinion than yours as to whether my estimate is worth covering. My multiple estimates are authoritative and reliable in that they have been shown to be about a mile from official Census Bureau calculations. Since I issue them on an annual basis, they provide an important snapshot as to what is happening to US settlement patterns between Censuses. Like any researcher, I am eager to share my findings with those interested. There is no shame in disseminating high-quality information. Best, Alex.zakrewsky (talk) 01:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Alex.zakrewsky. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 00:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]