User talk:4ipid

Welcome!

Hello, 4ipid, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Samte Khoda, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samte Khoda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samte Khoda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samte Khoda. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Najmeddin Shariati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Najmeddin Shariati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[1]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 22:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello 4ipid. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Najmeddin Shariati, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:4ipid. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=4ipid|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear @Rosguill, Thank you for your sensitivity to the health of Wikipedia articles. I assure you, I did not get paid for this person's article. And I have no relationship with him. If I follow the status of this article, it is only because I want a correct article to remain in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's guidelines. If my follow-up has caused the impression that I have received a fee for the creation of this article. I no longer have any opinion regarding this article and I will leave it to the final decision of the respected administrators whether or not to stay in Wikipedia. thanks 4ipid (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have claimed File:Najmeddin Shariati (cropped).jpg as your own work. Can you please explain how you took this photo without interacting with Shariati? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photo on the mentioned date behind the scenes of the Bermuda TV program (Source: https://tvnasim.ir/program/416629 ) in which Shariati was invited as a guest because I am a photographer in the Iranian TV unit. What I mean by not interacting with Shariati is not having a kinship relationship, friendship and being his supporter. Otherwise, I have seen him up close and I took this photo in the same meeting. 4ipid (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you definitely should have been upfront about that connection, and should disclose it before editing the topic by carefully reading and complying with WP:COI. You should then resubmit the article through AfC, per that guideline. As you already have version of the article prepared for AfC at Draft:Najmeddin Shariati, I will delete the version in mainspace as an unnecessary duplicate (otherwise I would move it to Draft space). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samte Khoda moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Samte Khoda. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]