User talk:32.214.195.155

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (32.214.195.155) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 04:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rassilon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Rassilon returned again in the finale of Series 9, having regenerated into a new form (portrayed by [[Donald Sumpter]]. Desperate to find out about the Hybrid that threatens Gallifrey,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Julio Sanchez (The Closer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chrisw80 (talk) 07:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Not sure why its "unconstructive" but okay. I did post again after you sent that message but I didn't get the message until after the post was done so I didn't see the warning beforehand.--32.214.195.155 (talk) 07:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I haven't looked at the following edit. The edit I reverted just didn't make much sense in the context and the prose was confusing. I should have worded my warning less strongly. Chrisw80 (talk) 08:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

edits to Person of Interest

Per WP:TVCAST, what takes place in the episode doesn't belong in the cast section, but in a plot section or episode listing. Ryan8374 (talk) 04:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from my talk page...The guy is now dead. I was just reflecting that and how.

I understand that, but it's not standard practice to keep the cast section up to date with a character's status. WP:TVCAST suggests that editors "Try to avoid using the section as a repository for further "in-universe" information that really belongs in the plot summary" Ryan8374 (talk) 04:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the List of Scorpion episodes plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 04:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Azazel (Supernatural), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball} 01:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm SwagGangster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Regeneration (Doctor Who) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SwagGangster ^★ 00:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Appropriate amount of detail for a general purpose encyclopedia

I saw you recently expanded the plot of Fire with Fire (2012 film). The problem is that you added way too much detail. Our guideline of film plots recommends that they stay within 400 and 700 words. This is so that they are useful in understanding the work but are free of overwhelming detail. Plots that have 1000+ words are usually that long because they summarize the film scene by scene instead of telling us, in general terms, what the film is about. That kind of detail is more appropriate for Wikia. As a general purpose encyclopedia, Wikipedia is expected to cover only the most important aspects of a work. The focus should also be mostly on real-world aspects, not detailed in-universe facts. This extends to character lists, which it seems you're also interested in. If you're unsure of what I'm talking about, please feel free to ask for help at the Teahouse, a forum for newer users. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Work on The Good Doctor

I wanted to thank you for taking the time to write episode summaries for The Good Doctor (TV series). You may have noticed that I extensively edited two episode summaries that you wrote, so I wanted to make sure I let you know that I appreciated the work you did. The summaries you wrote were a little over guideline length, so my edits were mostly geared around conserving detail to reduce length. But my job was made easy by the high quality of your prose. Judging from this Talk page, I think that some other editors over the years have been a little overzealous in describing your edits as nonconstructive; I see a strong history of good-faith edits and competent writing. I hope you will consider registering for Wikipedia in order to have a screen name and greater engagement with the editing community. --DavidK93 (talk) 20:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice apostrophe edit on Halo 4! Cool12y (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Masumrezarock100. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spider-Man (2002 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 09:30, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fear the Walking Dead (season 5). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 07:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of The 100 characters. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WikiAviator (talk) 02:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hallelujah (Leonard Cohen song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 03:12, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019

Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Princess and the Frog have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Tolly 4 bolly 09:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nomination of Tommy Clark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommy Clark, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Clark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.