Talk:Vyjayanthimala

A fact from Vyjayanthimala appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Vyjayanthimala, who played Chandramukhi in the 1955 film Devdas, declined the Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actress because she thought that her role was not a supporting one?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Tamil Nadu / Chennai Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chennai (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Vyjayanthimala Madhumati.jpg

Image:Vyjayanthimala Madhumati.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vyjayanthimala.jpg

Image:Vyjayanthimala.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fan point of view

I am seriously mad right now...as far to consider about this article..i'm still working on it...and how come a tag with fan point of view is being displayed!! Please stop damaging this article!! It wasn't written in a fan point of view. Try to check other legendary actress and I'll sure that this article is much more better!! Stop tagging in good articles!! Please save this legend's article. Pravinraj (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pravin, Wikipedia's manual of style is much more muted than the usual Indian film reporting language. So writing a wikipedia article from indian film news sources will result in it being called "fan language" (has happened to me before). Calling her a "legendary actress" in itself will be construed as fan language. This article is very comprehensive but needs a serious tone down to confirm to our MOS. mute the tone down or ask the guild of copy editors to take a look. Sometimes when we are too involved in writing about a subject, it is difficult to step back and see where we are using "fan language" etc. This article is much much better than most of the other Indian film star articles, but it can be even more better, if you let other people copyedit it and make it compliant with our Mos. --Sodabottle (talk) 11:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for saying this dude...I would be much more happier if this article is rich in information rather than achieve a good article status and yes, you are correct that I'm trying to make this article mine. And please don't interfere with this article...I lovethis article so much and I'm happy with it..Sorry if I'm being too rude...Pravinraj (talk) 13:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pravin, its great that you are enthusiastic about this topic and that you want to contribute to the improvement of the article. But sometimes editors can be let their personal feelings get in the way of neutral prose and presentation of the text. Please be sure to read the policies on WP:NPOV and WP:OWNERSHIP. All the best to you. And thanks for all your contributions to Wikipiedia!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

“I'm trying to make this article mine. And please don't interfere with this article” Such sentiments are very much against the spirit and functioning of wikipedia. Read WP:OWNERSHIP. And the article can be "rich in information" and comply to our other standards. The language will change but the facts wont. So let others work on it without getting frustrated. It will be better for the article--Sodabottle (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also you might have missed, but on the bottom of every page right under the Save button, you are agreeing to "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." If it is going to bother you that someon else changes your work, you are in the wrong place.Active Banana (^bananaphone 04:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fan POV tag

I've added a Fan POV tag for generally pufferry and hype like this unsourced sentence in the lead "Most of her movies have been critically acclaimed besides being major hits at box office."-- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

multiple names?

Whats the deal - was she also known by Vyjayanthi? There seems to be a slo mo edit war over the name and the sources seem to use both. Active Banana (^bananaphone 23:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning Caste

Dear Editors!
There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.
And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.
Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not here, please. There is a community discussion taking place at WT:INB and I would advise people to read the entire discussion before forming an opinion because the above summary is incorrect. Nothing more need be said here. - Sitush (talk) 01:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vyjayanthimala in AMAR DEEP with Dev Anand not appearing in the list of 1958 films

Film Amardeep is not appearing in 1958 films of Vyjayanthimala — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrkoranne (talk • contribs) 06:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vyjayanthimala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304065453/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070302/nation.htm#3 to http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070302/nation.htm#3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Vm-dk.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Film Heroine

Can you post the appropriate main picture of this great artist, rather than the picture when the artist is in her retirement age. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.96.170.44 (talk) 16:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]