Talk:Christopher Cazenove

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Hampshire

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Date of birth and age at the time of death

Both The Guardian, CBS and MSNBC among others give his age as 64 at the time of death which should make him born in 1945. BBC is the only source I can find that gives his age as 66.Karbuncle (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - for now should stay as 1945 unless debunked by a reliable source. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For me it isn't that clear. Times Online, Telegraphe.co.uk and others media in the world has 66. Also IMDB has 1943 as year of born. Here some news from today all over the world, many has 64, many 66: Google News. --KurtR (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

News: The funeral-inviting-picture says born in 1943 not 1945! IMO 1943 is right, not the 1945 that news agencies wrote. What do you think? --KurtR (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you all think about my last message? In WP.DE they already changed it to 1943. --KurtR (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are sources giving 1943 and others 1945. His death certificate or record in the birth index would be a better source. Jim Michael (talk) 16:32, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Birth registered in 1943. Jim Michael (talk) 04:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Year of birth definitely 1943 as per birth records at findmypast.co.uk:

BMD Search result details

Civil Registration event: Birth

Name: CAZENOVE, Christopher De L

Registration District: Winchester

County: Hampshire

Year of Registration: 1943

Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec

Mother's Maiden Name: Gurney

Volume No: 2C

Page No: 167 Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Photo

Does anyone else think this photo looks like it was taken in a locker room.. he played Bond dude.. cant we do better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.161.198.4 (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christopher Cazenove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120726144826/http://forum.bcdb.com/forum/Christopher_Cazenove_66_was_star_in_Dynasty_P108187 to http://forum.bcdb.com/forum/Christopher_Cazenove_66_was_star_in_Dynasty_P108187

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christopher Cazenove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100429130333/http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/shepton/news/Somerset-bred-star-small-big-screen-dies-aged-66/article-2012888-detail/article.html to http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/shepton/news/Somerset-bred-star-small-big-screen-dies-aged-66/article-2012888-detail/article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]