Wikipedia:Peer review/University of Canterbury Faculty of Law/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because I want it double checked.
Thanks, MitchellMatchbox (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Airship
[edit]A double check has arrived. This'll be a fairly general review.
- In general, a few too many section headers. I would remove all the subsection headers from "Academic Profile" and "Organisations and publications", and the "notable alumni" subsection header too.
- Note that only the first word of section headers should be capitalised.
- For the "notable people" section, note that faculty members are usually counted as alumni for the purpose of lists. If you cite specific faculty members, they will need citations; at the moment, most are uncited. The same goes for the list of Deans.
- I would suggest prosifying most of the section and removing any headers, and instead having three paragraphs: "Notable students include ...", "Notable faculty members include...", "The list of deans are..."
- The lead should certainly be expanded. Note that MOS:LEAD advises that it summarise the whole article. At present, very little is summarised.
- Sourcing seems generally good, but less primary and more secondary sourcing would always be useful.
Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @MitchellMatchbox: To ensure that they saw the above. Is this PR ready to be closed? Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)