Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/October-2022

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2025:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Baryte

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 01:53:53 (UTC)

Reason: Quality depiction of Baryte crystal formation. The opaque substrate on the bottom is dolomite. I saw this on Commons recently.
Articles in which this image appears: Baryte
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 04:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Barite - Cerro Warihuyn, Miraflores, Huamalies, Huanuco, Peru.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palm Cockatoo

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 07:02:20 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image of an iconic cockatoo
Articles in which this image appears: Palm Cockatoo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – JJ Harrison (talk) 07:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Rather indistinct due to subject's stance. – Sca (talk) 13:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Given File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - Natuurkundige Commissie - Art by Bik, ? - Bird species - MMNAT01 AF NNM001000149 001.jpg makes it clear what was considered the key defining aspects, and given this image shows them well, I think it does a good job. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 21:42, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:15, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cape York Graceful Treefrog

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 07:00:04 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image showing all key features. Only identified as a new species in 2016.
Articles in which this image appears: Ranoidea bella
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – JJ Harrison (talk) 07:00, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Target article is a 90-word stub. – Sca (talk) 13:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd say, as long as it's not at risk of merging, that can be dealt with before POTD (I'm the POTD co-ordinator). Longer would be better, though. There's plenty of material in the article's sources. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 21:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It need category on Commons. --Petar Milošević (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support And, if you'll forgive the immediate laziness but promise of future effort, if the image gets more supports I'll try and do a 5x expansion and get it to DYK. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 21:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – recognized as a new species recently. Bammesk (talk) 14:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue-banded Pitta

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 06:46:34 (UTC)

Reason: Meets criterion, skulking bird that was a pain to photograph
Articles in which this image appears: Blue-banded pitta
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – JJ Harrison (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help but think this needs recropped a bit. A little too much blurriness around the bird. It's arguably artistic, but its unusualness is pulling too much focus. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 21:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The details on the bird look harsh and over-processed at full size. Bammesk (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iolanthe

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2022 at 20:01:23 (UTC)

Reason: Lead image in Iolanthe with good reason: Gives several key scenes in a bright, colourful way. Text is a little wonky, but that's original; there's no way to make it all straight.
Articles in which this image appears: Iolanthe
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: George H. Walker & Co. restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 20:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: Your support is appreciated, ~~but I suspect you meant one of the two for a different image.~~Fixed now Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 23:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tomer T (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Iolanthe piano transcriptions by Ernst Perabo.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earth's absorption and radiation

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2022 at 16:07:42 (UTC)

Incoming energy absorbed by earth and its atmosphere: Top-of-atmosphere (TOA) shortwave flux radiation, shows energy (in watts per square metre) received from the Sun as inferred from CERES measurements (26–27 January 2012). Brightest white areas show the highest reflectivity (least absorption) of solar energy, while darkest blue areas show the greatest absorption.

Outgoing energy radiated by earth and its atmosphere: Top-of-atmosphere (TOA) longwave flux radiation (26–27 January 2012). Heat energy radiated from Earth (in watts per square metre) is shown in shades of yellow, red, blue and white. The brightest-yellow areas are the hottest and are emitting the most energy out to space, while the dark blue areas and the bright white clouds are much colder, emitting the least energy.

Reason: This set of videos shows a snapshot of the energy absorbed (incoming, blue image) and the energy radiated (outgoing, red image) by the earth and its atmosphere. The data includes transient atmospheric effects (cloud contributions). The data was collected over a two day period in January 2012. This set is informative in the two articles and helps explain the subject. If this nom gets a few supports, I will convert the video formats to WebM (which is preferred to ogv).
Articles in which this image appears: Earth's energy budget, Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Others
Creator: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 16:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
One can't help but feel that using different colour scales for things meant to be compared, and the inability to watch them next to each other, makes this an awkward set. A simple map projection - ideally without the missing information in the top image - would allow easy comparison. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 13:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a simple comparison, their physics are different. The incoming is shortwave radiation (blue, as in optics) and the outgoing is longwave (red, as in optics). The outgoing includes energy storage effects, but the incoming has no such thing. The outgoing relates to heat on Earth (red being a natural choice), and the incoming related to input from outer space (blue being Earth's natural color from outer space). Yes a map would be easier to look at. However, the incoming video conveys a spatial relation between the energy source (the Sun) and the revolving of Earth (useful for novice readers). There is an advantage in either type of illustration. The missing data on the incoming video is unfortunate, but this isn't an everyday type of measurement, IMO it's good enough. Bammesk (talk) 01:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment what is the strip across south america in File:NPP Ceres Shortwave Radiation.ogv.©Geni (talk) 09:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's the missing information (data) that Adam and I are referring to above. Bammesk (talk) 01:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Germany–Poland border

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 16:47:27 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Good drone image.
Articles in which this image appears: Germany–Poland border
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: A.Savin

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a photo of a river and a couple of bridges, so I'm not seeing particularly strong EV for this topic. Yes it's notable that the German-Polish border is now undefended and trivial for most people to cross, but there has to be a better way to illustrate this topic than this photo (a photo of a sign marking the border at the side of a highway would get the message across more effectively, for instance). Nick-D (talk) 19:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin (talk) 03:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – This river is a defining feature of the border (along with Neisse river), now as well as historically (in medieval times). Bammesk (talk) 03:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not so sharp as it could be from drone. --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Its sharp at 4K. Beyond that given drone sensor size you are going to hit issues with being diffraction limited.©Geni (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I'll buy that. Support. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 13:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Border map no. 21

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 16:56:35 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last year, where it was featured unanimously. Very high resolution map.
Articles in which this image appears: Lapp Codicil of 1751
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
Creator: Unknown

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Too big at 41Kx16K pixels, thus Oppose unless file resized to manageable size (e.g. earlier upload 2021-12-04 12:36:54), now it breaks Firefox, breaks ZoomViewer. There's no need for a map with this little detail to be such a large file. --Janke | Talk 21:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the size of the tiny text justifies it, but a courtesy copy would be nice. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 16:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Target is a 217-word stub. – Sca (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't see the EV relative to the article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I kind of have to agree. It's only a tiny bit of the map, in the end, and there's not really much text saying why this is an important part of the border (if it is). I could see it as part of a gallery/set, but it's hard to understand why specifically this one. I also fully get why it passed Commons, where the usage wouldn't be judged so much. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 15:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment has this been upscaled at some point? At full resolution it looks blocky.©Geni (talk) 10:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dalmatian pelican

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2022 at 12:10:30 (UTC)

Reason: High quality images. FP on Commons. Not in infobox as bird in flight but high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Dalmatian pelican
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think these deserve to be in the article, but damn that article's image use is an utter mess. They're a gallery sandwiched between images left and right. I think they're excellent images, but can we quickly fix the usage? ~~Conditional~~ Support. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 18:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed images that added no EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. And sorry, but, well, you know. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 23:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tomer T (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support second. The first has rather heavy shadows.©Geni (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dalmatian pelican (Pelecanus crispus) in flight Danube delta 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only the second image has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fan-bristled robber fly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2022 at 12:24:10 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Asilidae, Dysmachus, Dysmachus trigonus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Depth of field is a little narrower than I'd like, but for struggling prey and a moment to shoot it, this is amazing. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 20:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 10:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support ©Geni (talk) 11:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Robber fly (Promachus sp.) female with bee prey Babadag.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant hawkmoth

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2022 at 12:17:14 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Deilephila elpenor
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Might cut a few pixels from the bottom to remove some of the blurred foreground, but otherwise extremely good. Background slightly distracting, but not too bad. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 16:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What's that wavy background? An artifact due to focus stacking? --Janke | Talk 19:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wicker chair as mentioned on Commons FPC. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Background. --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poster for A Sensation Novel

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2022 at 02:57:07 (UTC)

Reason: There's maybe one or two more Royal Gallery of Illustration operettas of note that posters are available for,^[1] but this is to some extent the end of the set. This one is for a work by W. S. Gilbert and Thomas German Reed which is still revived occasionally; indeed, I actually performed in it back in 2017 or so. The poster gets reproduced in Gilbert biographies a lot as well, and the plot is rather fun, albeit with a couple bits we decided to cut as they hadn't aged well.
By the by, if this passes, ~~and the Iolanthe one lower down this page does too~~Passed., by my count this'll be 599 FPs. I'm planning a more labour-intensive one for #600. (I also have one backup prepared for if Iolanthe doesn't pass, because I plan these things way too much.)

^ Balfe's The Sleeping Queen gets occasional performances still, and Tom Taylor's The Family Legend is at least discussed in books I've read (mainly for having inspired Ages Ago and thus Ruddigore, but, y'know. That might be as much because a lot of the books I read about it in were specifically on W. S. Gilbert, who I helped raise to Featured Article well enough that I don't think it's ever been challenged.) But I digress.

Articles in which this image appears: A Sensation Novel, German Reed Entertainments, Thomas German Reed, Royal Gallery of Illustration
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: Robert Jacob Hamerton, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 02:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

US Hurricane Damage - Waffle House Index

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2022 at 01:42:27 (UTC)

Reason: Subject Usefulness: Non-meteorological indices helping to describe the relative enormity of a hurricane impact.; Technical: good framing, very high resolution, good contrast, immediately striking display of the topic (aftermath of a severe storm), image taken by a well known and celebrated photographer who has donated her entire work to the Library of Congress with free license, image applicable to other articles / illustrative of various storm-related encyclopedic articles / useful into future entries related to catastrophic storms
Articles in which this image appears: Waffle House Index
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Contents/Technology_and_applied_sciences
Help me find a better category here; I can't find anything related to disaster response, crisis management, storms, etc. Thank you.
Creator: Carol M. Highsmith

Support as nominator – Darkskysunflowers (talk) 01:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - a mere snapshot (yes, pros take them, too) which does not convey the massive destruction of Katrina. --Janke | Talk 10:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image is not illustrating Katrina, but the Waffle House Index Darkskysunflowers (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I know. But it conveys very little info nevertheless. Not among Wiki's "best" IMO. --Janke | Talk 17:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Aside from this not being a particularly great photo (in itself not a disqualifying issue for a Wikipedia FP), I don't think it illustrates the topic well as it depicts a devastating disaster that no business could survive. The 'Waffle House Index' is largely a reference to the chain's reputation for staying open or quickly reopening in the face of natural disasters, so an photo showing a Waffle House open despite destruction around it would better illustrate the topic. Nick-D (talk) 08:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Really good point. Nomination withdrawn. Darkskysunflowers (talk) 08:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per previous. Meh. – Sca (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marine salvage

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2022 at 10:39:58 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last year, where it was featured unanimously. Lead image in its article for 1.5 years.
Articles in which this image appears: Marine salvage etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water
Creator: Jaan Künnap

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – interesting to look at, eye catching IMO. Bammesk (talk) 16:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 13:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting 'historical' photo but does it add value to the article? I don't think so. You can't even be sure who is salvaging who. There is no salvage action and no salvage equipment visible. Google marine salvage and you'll see what I mean. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Antique shop

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2022 at 16:44:10 (UTC)

Reason: Quality image of an Antique shop, and lead image of the article since 2013. There is a small motion blur on her head-hair area, due to the low lighting and therefore the slow shutter speed. I wouldn't hold that against the photograph though, because it shows she is alive and human, unlike every object in the shop. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Antique shop, Antique, +3
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
Creator: Jorge Royan

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 16:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 17:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is not an antique shop; it is a part of a market with many sellers. The items on sale are vintage, not antique. Quite apart from that, this is an out-of-focus image, poorly composed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amphipoea oculea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2022 at 10:28:25 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC just over a month ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Amphipoea oculea
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 17:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Article totals 200 words – stub territory for the main page. – Sca (talk) 12:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I am leaning to support, but the wings look soft for a focus stacked photo. Am I missing something? Is there perhaps mis-stacking artifacts on the wings? @Iifar:. Bammesk (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support, 18 reviewers on Commons think the sharpness is fine, plus 2 more here, I go with that in this case. Bammesk (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 07:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Amphipoea oculea - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moss campion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2022 at 01:19:18 (UTC)

Reason: Meets the high technical standard, and is hi-res. Great composition, subtle lighting. Captures well the habitat that the plant grows in. Beautiful image.
Articles in which this image appears: Silene acaulis, Søraust-Svalbard Nature Reserve, List of biogeographic provinces
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: User:Hermanhi

Support as nominator – Libcub (talk) 01:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Valuable, but not a great photo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I like the composition a lot, honestly. It's the camera quality that's holding it back. Everything's just a bit out of focus and it's not so big of an image that that's forgivable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 13:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Adam here. I found this really eye-catching at thumbnail size, to the point that I am commenting although usually the photos of pretty flars here just bore me. But at full resolution it's obvious that there's some sharpness missing. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Owlfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2022 at 21:38:04 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Owlfly, Libelloides macaronius
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Chaoitc background, object is not so sharp and some vibrance could be added. --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
vibrance? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 05:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe he means boosting color saturation. -- Sca (talk) 13:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I presume Charles knows what he 's doing. Barring evidence owlflies are more bright in colour, Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 05:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:04, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Smooth billed ani

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2022 at 21:49:25 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. Nominated in 2017 when it received 4 support and 2 oppose votes. The image has been completely reworked since then.
Articles in which this image appears: Smooth-billed ani
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Not a great deal of visual interest, IMO. – Sca (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poor black bird. Does an animal have to have pretty colours for FP? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 18:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 05:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – per previous nom. Bammesk (talk) 03:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I'll take the fifth... --Janke | Talk 17:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Smooth-billed ani (Crotophaga ani) GC.JPG --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Bartels

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2022 at 03:36:58 (UTC)

Reason: Easily the best image available for her. A dramatic pose, a nice expression, and a very labour intensive restoration (so many little horizontal microtears)...
Articles in which this image appears: Anna Bartels
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Ferdinand Flodin^(sv), restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 03:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I don't think she becomes a Norwegian opera singer through marriage. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, is this the categorisation of the article? Yeah, that's weird. I'll just remove that. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 18:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although the top-right needs a touch-up. MER-C 18:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On it Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 18:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should be done. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 19:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – nice (painful) restoration. Bammesk (talk) 15:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support EV (t · c) buidhe 23:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Anna Fernqvist, rollporträtt - SMV - H1 122 - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2022 at 04:23:51 (UTC)

Reason: And, while we're at it, a stunning chioscuro artwork - I've probably misspelt that - which shows how art was designed for woodblock engraving, as well as being a stunning image for an interesting play. It's a very good parody of Hamlet where Claudius' crime is much less (he wrote a really terrible play), so the plot focuses more on how annoying it is having Hamlet running about soliliquising all the time, and no-one dies.
Articles in which this image appears: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (play), Madeleine Lucette Ryley, Nathaniel Newnham-Davis (journalist).
FP category for this image: WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator: Ralph Cleaver, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 04:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This one-off charity performance should not define the play (i.e the article). Interesting of course, but not so much EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: Given the show's history - its early history was largely defined by benefit performances, save for a single run, and the first performance was a benefit performance - I think it's not atypical, and it gets the mood and spirit of the show quite well in the middle illustration of the dénouement. It's also not a show with a lot of illustration options. It's possible I could find some of the 1891 benefit or the 1892 short run, but whether they'd be particularly worthwhile is hard to say. Known drawings do not bode well (Though I'm pretty sure that's Hamlet's speech to the players, which is at least a significant moment; mind, the current suggestion is the performance itself that the play centres around.) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 18:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support (t · c) buidhe 19:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quadrupole ion trap

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2022 at 15:35:43 (UTC)

Reason: This shows flour grains levitated in a quadrupole ion trap. Science subjects are hard to depict. This brings attention to the subject, and as FPC instructions say: "to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article" (I hope). Not a high pixel count but meets the FP requirement.
Articles in which this image appears: Quadrupole ion trap
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
Creator: Jan Pavelka

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's somewhat important to ask: Is the green light functional in some way? Because the ion trap works with rapidly changing electrical fields. If the light's part of the device, then of course I'd support. If it's just being used to make it look "science-y", though, I can't. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 05:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neither. It's not part of the electric field (which is radio frequency per article, and invisible), and it's not there to make it science-y. It's there (perhaps at both ends) to illuminate the trap space and the trapped particles, to make them visible. The particles are almost microscopic. That's what the device is designed for, ionized/charged particles, i.e. very small. It will be hard to see much there with room lighting, camera flash and such. Bammesk (talk) 14:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's functional, then. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 17:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. There appears to be pretty significant subject motion blur on the trapped grains, but I think that serves an encyclopedic purpose, to show their motion within the trap rather than conveying the impression that it freezes everything in place. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the motion is part of its physics, and not an anomaly. Bammesk (talk) 03:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mangosteen

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2022 at 14:50:25 (UTC)

Reason: Quality image of the mangosteen fruit. (currently on Commons FPC)
Articles in which this image appears: Mangosteen, Garcinia
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 14:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 05:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support EV (t · c) buidhe 23:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There's also a current FP which shows the fruit in a longitudinal section, and is currently used (rather inappropriately IMO) in the prepared food infobox for canned mangosteen in syrup. The horizontal cross-section in the new image is a much better depiction not least because that's how the fruit is normally opened, though maybe some indication that the two fruits are shown in different orientations would be a good idea. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the current FP should be replaced with this one (if it passes) and nominated for delisting. MER-C 16:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the older FP should be delisted, its resolution is too low. I am neutral on its article usage. Bammesk (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mangosteens - whole and opened.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ovenbird

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2022 at 11:09:23 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Ovenbird, New World warbler
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Rhododendrites

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not quite unanimously. As I said at Commons FP there is a strange unfocused section that could not be explained. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites, MER-C, and Charlesjsharp: I do wish this had been responded to. I don't like voting when there's doubts. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 00:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubts about what? I responded at the Commons fpc. There's nothing weird going on -- just a couple feathers which look a bit smoother/less detailed than the others. It's in the raw file. That kind of pixel peeping may be sufficient motivation for some not to support, I guess. I think it's a special shot per what I wrote over there, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Berchtesgaden National Park

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2022 at 11:15:46 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Berchtesgaden National Park
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Milseburg

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Picture-perfect comp. – Sca (talk) 12:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unless we're going to insist that every FP is focus-stacked, this is as close to perfection as we can ever expect. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 02:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Nythar (💬-🎃) 07:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Herbst in den Berchtesgadener Alpen.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Planehead filefish

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2022 at 01:10:15 (UTC)

Reason: Quality lead image of this fish. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Stephanolepis hispidus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 00:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Needs a fifth. --Janke | Talk 19:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gallito (Stephanolepis hispidus), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-06, DD 16.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karen tribal woman

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2022 at 02:02:50 (UTC)

Reason: A woman in traditional Karen clothing. We haven't had a nom in this category for a while. Quality image and FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Karen people
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Traditional dress
Creator: Varvara Kless-Kaminskaia

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 02:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nythar (💬-🎃) 02:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The single subject of the photo is not identified in the caption here or in the article. – Sca (talk) 13:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. While I don't think Sca's reasoning is relevant to the Featured Picture Criteria, this photo was taken at a manufactured tourist attraction in Pattaya, and the authenticity of the portrayed subject and thus the accuracy of the information the image provides should be strongly questioned, especially since it's being used in the Karen people article as the infobox image. I've removed the image from the article, considering that it was added as part of the WPWP campaign, which is known for generating a huge amount of poor quality/inaccurate image additions. The photo could probably find better use illustrating an article about ethnic tourism or something along those lines, were it accompanied by relevant and verifiable commentary. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good points by Paul_012. I withdraw this nomination. Bammesk (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DART Impact

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2022 at 03:03:49 (UTC)

Original – DART's final 5.5 minutes until impact. This replay movie is 10 times faster than reality, except for the last six images, which are shown at the same rate that the spacecraft returned them.

Reason: Impact video of the DART asteroid redirection test on September 26, 2022. First video of its kind. For details see the lead section of the article.
Articles in which this image appears: Double Asteroid Redirection Test
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding
Creator: NASA/Johns Hopkins APL

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support –--Janke | Talk 11:11, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 00:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dart impact replay.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Simbel Small Temple

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2022 at 16:39:26 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Abu Simbel
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 17:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:23, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The perspective is a little odd - compare File:Ramsis,_Aswan_Governorate,_Egypt_-_panoramio.jpg - , but probably inevitable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 01:13, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kagu

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2022 at 17:19:06 (UTC)

Reason: For the wow factor and the awesome eye level view. Sometimes the wow factor trumps technical details. Lead image of the article, EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Kagu
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 17:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 03:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hübnerite

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2022 at 16:47:17 (UTC)

Reason: Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears: Hübnerite
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Materials science
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 16:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 17:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 09:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Arguably a lot of reflections, but it's obvious where they are. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 01:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nythar (💬-🎃) 07:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hübnerite - Pasto Bueno, Ancash, Peru.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Construction of the World Trade Center

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2022 at 09:16:49 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Construction of the World Trade Center
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Bernard Gotfryd

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Tilted, too tight framing, unappealing color. Not among Wiki's "best"... --Janke | Talk 11:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Janke. Poor composition, lighting. – Sca (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Good idea, but the tight bottom crop is a problem. There are better images out there [1], but their copyright may be a problem. Bammesk (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Duchess of Dantzic

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2022 at 14:40:27 (UTC)

Reason: Restored poster from the early 20th century
Articles in which this image appears: The Duchess of Dantzic
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Theatre
Creator: Percy Anderson, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 14:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 20:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Balfe's The Sleeping Queen gets occasional performances still, and Tom Taylor's The Family Legend is at least discussed in books I've read (mainly for having inspired Ages Ago and thus Ruddigore, but, y'know. That might be as much because a lot of the books I read about it in were specifically on W. S. Gilbert, who I helped raise to Featured Article well enough that I don't think it's ever been challenged.) But I digress.

[1]