Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Addition log/2025

Billboard number-one country songs (4th supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Billboard number-one country songs for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2024

Billboard number-one country songs

Mana series (3rd supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Mana series for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

Visions of Mana

Mana series

14 articles

Final Fantasy Adventure

Secret of Mana

Trials of Mana

Legend of Mana‎

Sword of Mana

Children of Mana‎

Dawn of Mana

Heroes of Mana

Rise of Mana

Adventures of Mana

Trials of Mana (2020)

Visions of Mana

Music of the Mana series

Contributor(s): ProtoDrake, PresN

PresN created the Mana series topic in 2015, and believed it completed, but over the years it has been added to twice. Now, the latest series entry Visions of Mana has released and I managed to get the article through the GAN process within the three month limit, so it can be added to this topic. I didn't think I'd be so enthused about this game, but I have been, and I'll be more than happy if it can join its fellows in this topic. Also pinging @Judgesurreal777 and IDV: as they contributed to the first supplementary nomination with their work on Adventure of Mana. To those who weigh in on this nomination, thank you. --ProtoDrake (talk) 11:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as original topic creator, always good to see this topic kept up to date whenever Square Enix revisits it! --Pres N 12:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love to see topics stay up to date. Also small note I fixed the disambiguation link in the lead Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Roberth Martinez (talk) 00:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hold Echoes of Mana, a recent release, has just been added and is notable, but not yet at Good Article quality. Given that this Good Topic includes mobile spinoffs like Rise of Mana, it seems to me further work could be done so that it passes the WP:WIAFT 1D criteria of no obvious gaps in coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh.... --ProtoDrake (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not to add to the bubble-bursting, but I also believe Secret of Mana (2018 video game) can and should be an article before this Good Topic could be called comprehensive. While it gets short shrift in the article, and I'm sure some fans would rather see it forgotten, it's nevertheless a full 3D remake with its own dev team and reviews, and remakes tend to be notable enough for articles, including multiple remakes in this Good Topic, such as Adventures of Mana and Trials of Mana (2020 video game). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm not really sold that obscure mobile spinoff Echoes of Mana is blocking here. I get that topics should be comprehensive-ish but this could theoretically be covered as Circle of Mana is, just in Mana (series). If it is spun out, I'd be more willing to give it a pass as not required as a very minor "part" of the series - it'd be like not including video game series-themed pachislot spinoffs in a topic. That said... Secret of Mana (2018 video game) is more concerning. It looks like that's a mere one sentence in the main Secret of Mana article. I get not wanting to gunk up a featured article with unrelated stuff, but I do agree that this was a full remake akin to Adventures of Mana and should either have a full section in the Secret of Mana article, or its own separate article. SnowFire (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree, SnowFire. Honestly, I didn't see much coverage of the Secret of Mana remake, so while it could be expanded, it's unlikely to be more than a paragraph or two. As to Echoes, I don't know, but I don't have the IRL time or mental energy to commit to it, so maybe Zxcvbnm would like to take it on. --ProtoDrake (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It doesn't seem tremendously hard to get to GA standards so maybe I'll give it a go. But I'd rather try to get the remake page created first given its comparatively higher priority, obvious mainline status, and general agreement it needs a page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Zxcvbnm: I'd contest your reasonings on the remake. Two editors' comments don't make "higher priority", "obvious mainline status" and "general agreement". --ProtoDrake (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Okay, maybe I was overstating it. But the fact remains there is a lot of coverage about it which makes me see it as major. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] etc. Certainly more than "I didn't see much coverage". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      @Zxcvbnm: IMO those reviews could easily make up one paragraph of the main article. I'm against creating articles on remakes which would simple reuse/repeat information. But a stalled GT nomination isn't the place for this discussion. (Small addendum, Adventure of Mana is a renamed reworking for new platforms so relevant, and Trials of Mana remake has substantial differences in gameplay so relevant, while Secret of Mana remake appears not to have that many differences from the original) --ProtoDrake (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      To summarize ProtoDrake's concerns with a potential page for the 3D remake of Secret of Mana: The remake is just a 3D version of Secret of Mana with voice acting and not that much drastical changes compared to Adventure of Mana and Trials of Mana. Information on the 3D remake would fit just fine in the main page for Secret of Mana, just like how it was handled with Live A Live. Roberth Martinez (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- (de-indent) Let's add that paragraph then - expand the paragraph in Secret of Mana#Re-releases on what precisely 2018 SoM was, its differences from the original, etc. Then add a new section in Secret of Mana#Reception and legacy that discusses the reviews of 2018 SoM, both on its own merits and as a remake. SnowFire (talk) 20:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  @SnowFire: I've made a start on that. The 2018 SoM remake now has its development added, and based on the info I found, the devs confirm it's basically no different from the original sans graphics and a few other smaller additions, so having a whole article for it would be redundant. (Addendum: added reception now, and...it's once again nothing much.) --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Okay, I'll abandon the idea for the remake to get a separate article and just focus on Echoes. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hold until Echoes of Mana becomes GA TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE— jlwoodwa (talk) 03:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, support promotion- Echoes, having just been created, has 3 months to be promoted, and Zxcvbnm isn't showing much haste in working on it. This nomination should be closed as successful, and we can reconvene in February to either add Echoes or start an FLCR. --Pres N 03:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Agree with PresN. I'm satisfied that the added content in the Secret of Mana article on the remake is sufficient. We can revisit in 3-6 months on the progress of Echoes, and either merge it back or start a FLCR. (Although in the name of saving buearucracy, just merge it back if it's not that close to GA-able.). SnowFire (talk) 22:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand revisiting it months from now, but merging it back would be blatantly violating WP:WIAFT where it states "A topic must not cherry-pick only the best articles to become featured together." Merging something that nobody would have thought twice about being an article if it wasn't preventing a Good Topic is blatant cherry-picking.

Honestly the page is probably GA-ready already, so if anyone wants to try reviewing it or state what remains to be done before it can be a GA, let me know. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At a glance the development section is practically non-existant. Everything under it is just release info. The reception section while good at a glance inst great if you really dig in. I'm hesitant to say weather this would survive an AFD. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would easily survive an AfD, even without much development info it got SIGCOV in Nintendo World Report, RPGFan, The Escapist, and Siliconera. I did notice an interview about the game I missed, so Development should be getting bulked up a bit shortly. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leaving aside the ADF surviving assertion, there are about two thirds interviews by volume in the sources left on that article's talk page that I dug up and left about/on the main topic page in case someone wanted to create the article. So if someone actually wanted to, they could turn that article into something sound. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – K. Peake 09:28, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
* There was an issue that prevented the promotion bot from promoting this topic. Please solve the issue and run the bot again. The error description is: {{t|User:NovemBot/Promote}} template missing from page. NovemBot (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

Criminals (Meghan Trainor song)

Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries

13 articles

"All About That Bass"

"Title"

"Lips Are Movin"

"Marvin Gaye"

"Dear Future Husband"

"Like I'm Gonna Lose You"

"No"

"Me Too"

"No Excuses"

"Nice to Meet Ya"

"Made You Look"

"Criminals"

Getting the process going as Criminals (Meghan Trainor song) became a Good Article on 19 November. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Idiosincrático (talk) 16:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hey man im josh (talk) 14:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – K. Peake 21:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest (4th supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2024

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest

16 articles

Renominating to add the most recent participation, 2024, which is now a WP:GA as well. Grk1011 (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Seems straightforward. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Simple addition of the next in the sequence following GA approval. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 13:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 14:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as a straightforward addition of the latest year. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 23:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hey man im josh (talk) 15:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – K. Peake 20:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift (album) (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Taylor Swift (album) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

A Place in This World

Taylor Swift

7 articles

"Tim McGraw"

"Picture to Burn"

"Teardrops on My Guitar"

"A Place in This World"

"Should've Said No"

"Our Song"

The article, A Place in This World, was created by Brachy0008 and promoted to GA by me. Medxvo (talk) 12:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Idiosincrático (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Also noting that I fixed the target for Our Song in the template. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – K. Peake 20:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tour Championship (snooker) (3rd supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Tour Championship (snooker) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

2024 Tour Championship

Tour Championship

7 articles

2019 Tour Championship

2020 Tour Championship

2021 Tour Championship

2022 Tour Championship

2023 Tour Championship

2024 Tour Championship

Contributor(s): User:Lee Vilenski

Addition of new event 2024 Tour Championship for annual event. --Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Love to see a topic be kept up to date. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Straight forward and makes logical sense. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as a straightforward addition of the latest event. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The grouping of pairs into FAs and GAs is quite satisfying. Sounder Bruce 17:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I shall be working to ruin that by promoting one of them soon though! Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 20:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Idiosincrático (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to add to article(s) in question – K. Peake 19:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]