User talk:zmbro
Click here to leave a message.
Your GA nomination of Born in the U.S.A.
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Born in the U.S.A. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 21:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Born in the U.S.A.
[edit]The article Born in the U.S.A. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Born in the U.S.A. and Talk:Born in the U.S.A./GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 07:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Blood & Chocolate
[edit]The article Blood & Chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Blood & Chocolate for comments about the article, and Talk:Blood & Chocolate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Elephantranges -- Elephantranges (talk) 02:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Born in the U.S.A.
[edit]The article Born in the U.S.A. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Born in the U.S.A. for comments about the article, and Talk:Born in the U.S.A./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 01:02, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Moisejp I'm taking this to FAC. Do you want a co-nom? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 14:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Zmbro! I'd love to but I also don't want to be a freeloader and co-nom if you've done 99% of the work on it. As I think you know, my real life has been a lot busier lately and I've struggled to find ongoing Wikipedia time. What I'd like to suggest is maybe we can wait a couple of weeks and we can see whether I can manage any meaningful contribution to the article during that time. I've started reading through it and making small edits, but I'll need to do more than this for my contributions to be meaningful. And although my absence during the GAN review was not on purpose, I wouldn't want to be similarly quasi-absent during the FAC. I think you suggested the Reception section as a place I may be able to start with contributing to. Let me see if I can manage to do anything there, and in a couple of weeks (or however long you're comfortable with, although I wouldn't want it to drag on and on, and for my busyness to hold you back from tackling FAC if the article is more or less ready) we could touch base and decide how to proceed. Let me know what you think, thanks! Moisejp (talk) 19:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Discussion about "Label" or "distributor"
[edit]Hi Zmbro. There are recent comments at Simplifying "Release history" tables and "Label" or "distributor". Your comments would be appreciated. Regards. 2001:D08:2908:42B8:181A:25E0:D35F:7F03 (talk) 04:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)