Jump to content

User talk:VRJ Bandhu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hasnain Khan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 13:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arjun Lal Jingar has been accepted

[edit]
Arjun Lal Jingar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 04:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manyana, Rajasthan (May 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Vrjbandhu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manyana, Rajasthan has been accepted

[edit]
Manyana, Rajasthan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Titliaan (May 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baarish Ki Jaaye has been accepted

[edit]
Baarish Ki Jaaye, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

signed, Iflaq (talk) 06:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:VRJ Bandhu/sandbox/Ashish Chanchlani has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:VRJ Bandhu/sandbox/Ashish Chanchlani. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 03:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish Chanchlani

[edit]

I do try and respond where possible. Like most editors on Wikipedia I have other commitments outside of editing which sometimes means that I can't reply to questions as quickly as I'd like or other people expect. In some cases the issues/queries are addressed before I can get to them. Others are too complex and I just don't have the time (or inclination) to respond. Hey I'm only human.

In answer to your question on Ashish Chanchlani - my comments do not mean that the article cannot ever be created/moved to the mainspace. I was just highlighting to other reviewers that there have been assessments made of the article in the past which have highlighted significant concerns with the validity of the source used to support the article. I haven't had the time to review whether the sources you've included are acceptable or not and I might never get around to doing that - that;s life. Hopefully someone else might have the time to undertake a review in the meantime. Dan arndt (talk) 08:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dan arndt, I was wrong. –– 𝚅𝚁𝙹𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞

AfC notification: Draft:Ashish Chanchlani (comedian) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashish Chanchlani (comedian). Thanks! Jupitus Smart 17:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]
Information icon

Hello VRJ Bandhu. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Ashish Chanchlani (comedian), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:VRJ Bandhu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=VRJ Bandhu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Timtrent. I have never edited a payment till date and never will. I am a fan of Ashish Chanchlani. That's why I made it. And I am Extended Confirmed User. I could have moved it straight to manspace if I wanted to, but the opinion of the critics matters more to me. I do not want to do paid editing and never will. Editing Wikipedia is just my hobby, not a profession. I consulted reviewer Iflaq and admin -Malcolmxl5 before submitting it for review. I accept everything but I will never accept a false accusation against me. –– 𝚅𝚁𝙹𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞 03:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this declaration. That is all that is required of you FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Timtrent , Hope you are doing well. I am here as I got a ping. I don't think the user is a paid editor. They have made some positive contributions. I believe the user is new and may not have a full knowledge about the previous deletion discussions of the subject. I can guess this since the user reached to me few times for help. Thankyou, Have a good day! signed, Iflaq (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Iflaq Thank you for confirming their declaration above. This is, as you know, a question we ask when an editing pattern is questionable, and we accept the editor's simple declaration in response FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 06:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: I have never used promotional or promotional content on Wikipedia to date. I see for a few days you are deleting my edits. What promotional content have I added to Amit Bhadana? Tell me! And you also removed Amit Bhadana's thumb image. If you say anything, you threaten to block. This is wrong. –– 𝚅𝚁𝙹𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞 08:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You are not an AFC reviewer. Do not move pending submissions into mainspace with fake edit summaries pretending to use the AFCH script. bonadea contributions talk 05:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bilorv was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There are no new sources published since the last AfD, where it was determined (correctly) that the topic is not notable.
Bilorv (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 06:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emiway Bantai for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emiway Bantai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emiway Bantai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

bonadea contributions talk 17:36, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 21:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All Above

[edit]

Even if one song charted on a notable music chart it doesn’t make the album notable only the song - see WP:NALBUM - needs significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 12:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baarish Ki Jaaye cover art.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baarish Ki Jaaye cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 17:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, VRJ Bandhu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Above All (Jassa Dhillon album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VRJ Bandhu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Above All".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, VRJ Bandhu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashish Chanchlani (comedian), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VRJ Bandhu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashish Chanchlani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taaza Khabar (December 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 17:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DJ Wale Babu

[edit]

Information icon Hello, VRJ Bandhu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DJ Wale Babu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DJ Wale Babu

[edit]

Hello, VRJ Bandhu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DJ Wale Babu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. QueerEcofeminist🌈 03:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Elvish Yadav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The published article has been deleted thrice Elvish Yadav

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kya Loge Tum

[edit]

Information icon Hello, VRJ Bandhu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kya Loge Tum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elvish Yadav has been accepted

[edit]
Elvish Yadav, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you –– 𝚅𝚁𝙹𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞 01:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]