User talk:TydePod

May 2024

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tide Pods, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm User:Irltoad. I noticed a few additions you have made to articles such as Yorkville, Illinois and Yorkville High School which I have reverted because you failed to add any reliable sources and they are potentially contentious claims. I see you added citation needed, but this is not typically used for your own additions; the burden of evidence lies on the editor who added content. You also added these with incorrect dates (2019 and 2021 if I remember correctly). As I said in one of the edit summaries, if this is a well-known, verifiable fact, it is your responsibility to prove that, rather than adding it and expecting someone else to do so for you. Also please ensure all additions are relevant to the article. If you have any questions, feel free to ask here or on my talk page. Thank you --Irltoad (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IXL Learning (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent reliable sources cited, which is needed to establish notablity.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IXL Learning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grabup (talk) 02:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TydePod! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Grabup (talk) 02:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]