User talk:Sumneeb

Sam Reklaw

How are you related to MrSamContributor?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope you are doing great? No, I don't know Sam Reklaw. Why are you asking? (unsigned post by User:MrSamContributor)

I wasn't asking whether the Sumneeb account was related to Reklaw. I was asking about the relationship between the Sumneeb account and the MrSamContributor account. Based on your reply, I assume that both accounts are owned by the same person. Why did you create a second account?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have joined recently and looking to make changes in new, small articles to get expertise. I am not linked to that account in any term.

Please WP:SIGN your posts. I don't believe you. The Reklaw article is about as obscure as you can get, and I can't see any reason why your first edits would be to such an article. You are either operating two accounts or at a minimum you and MrSamContributor know each other.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand your concerns but my luck that I got to this page. Thank you for guiding me but I am learning these things. can you guide how to WP:SIGN Sumneeb (talk) 18:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I find the explanation by Sumneeb to be improbable: Checkuser needed.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bbb23, just noting what I responded with at my talk. These two accounts appear to be Unrelated ~TNT (she/they • talk) 13:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

lol is this a joke? I don't have 2 accounts, and I don't know the user Sumneeb either. It's not Okay and respectfully to make such allegations based on your simple thought. I'm just a young professional who is trying to contribute to a platform that I love. Since I'm here you keep tracking me and declined everything that I made instead of helping me like others.Bbb23 Please help me instead of persecuting me.

Sumneeb I am really sorry. Thank you for you edit again.

I am really surprised at this. Speechless! I was expecting that here people will guide me. It was tagged as orphan and I got curious. I found some words can be improved. I did so and what I got...Rather they started accusing me. Why is so? Sumneeb (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully all here I am a writer and editor. My main aim here is to improve my editing and writing skills. So I do random search and making small contributions.

I do understand that Bbb23 is concerned to keep article upto the standard. Same is the intention here.

I felt that Wikipedia is a source of great learning, for the writers and editors like me. I am learning good on this platform. I have learnt a lot and learning never stops. And my way of random searches can land me into many fields, like arts, sports, politics etc. Even your concerns made me learn few things. But I am not connected to MrSam Contributor. And I don't have any other account. Somehow, you want to check even then I don't object.

Hoping that I have answered your concerns. Sumneeb (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sumneeb, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sumneeb! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don Harris (Councilor) (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don Harris (Councilor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Don Harris (Councilor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don Harris (Councilor) (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NPOLITICIAN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don Harris (Councilor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Don Harris (Councilor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I felt really bad that it is rejected. He meets the criteria of WP:POLITICIAN because he has wide popularity in that region with a notable coverage. Sumneeb (talk) 04:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest to follow up at talk tab of Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography somewhere, asking them how to find a volunteer specialising in US politicians. --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 07:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

style question

Hi,

Could you please read WP:MoS (manual of style) to double check whether to refer to article subject by first name or last name inside of article. I thought it is first name and you are writing last name. What is the correct style?

To reply please click here.

Thanks, --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 07:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Gryllida,

Thank you for your guidance. I am looking into it. Sumneeb (talk) 10:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Sumneeb (talk) 10:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I would be happy to help if you have any other questions. To reply to this message, click "Edit" next to the heading (takes you here), and write your reply at the end, followed by four tildes. Regards, --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 20:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harris left office

By the way, a source says "Don Harris was a member of the Albuquerque City Council in New Mexico, representing District 9. Harris assumed office in 2005. Harris left office on December 31, 2021." (link). It is not an official or reliable source or anything (I found it when looking for something else), but it may be worthwhile to find more information in a reputable source, and update the draft. --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 21:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Don Harris (Ex-Councilor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Harris (Ex-Councilor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Harris (Ex-Councilor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]