User talk:Shadowwarrior8

Welcome!

Hello, Shadowwarrior8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Toddy1 (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Islamic Barnstar
		Your works and efforts on the subjects of Salafism, Reform Movements in Islam, and Wahhabism, especially by improving the Salafism-article, are much appreciated. Thank you for the good quality work you have done! VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah.. thank you, VenusFeuerFalle ❤

I think you too are enthusiastic about quality content; and I completely relate with your status. Wikipedia needs to be reliable and Neutral in religious issues.

I am ready to help you, whenever I can, in developing good quality articles. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words, I wonna remember this, when I need you help regarding good quality content. VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Eagles of the Whirlwind

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eagles of the Whirlwind, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Caliphate or the Supreme Imamate (book)

Hello, Shadowwarrior8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Caliphate or the Supreme Imamate (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Politics of Syria

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Politics of Syria, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Human rights in Syria

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Human rights in Syria, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elections in Syria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Council.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic modernism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missing reference

October 2023 Gaza–Israel conflict: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia contains a named reference "auto132" that is undefined and causing an error. Do you know what the reference is, or can you explain where the inserted material comes from? Bsherr (talk) 21:12, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Israel-Palestine is under WP:1RR

A polite but stern warning. Your edit warring around the inclusion of "anti-imperialism" in the infobox could get you blocked. If you are in a dispute like this, It is best to make a post on the talkpage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 06:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hemiauchenia I dont think there was a "dispute" or editwarring involved. No objection was raised to the inclusion of this sourced content except one editor who made biased WP:IDONTLIKEIT-style arguments. As you can see from the edit history, other editors also restored this content which was removed. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 07:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution in Syrian Civil War!

Hello, I didn't realize that the two parts of the infobox were specifying different groups, therefore thank you for your edit with clear and concise explanation! http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Template:Syrian_civil_war_infobox&diff=prev&oldid=1184163445 Mavreju (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Untermensch:

It's one thing to put back the ones I deleted. But what right do you have to delete the ORIGINAL documents I have presented? Szolnok95 (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, the Untermensch book is not anti-Slavic. And as I wrote, it does not become so by reference to others. Szolnok95 (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The SS booklet depicted the natives of Eastern Europe as "subhumans""

Where is this in the book? Szolnok95 (talk) 16:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

discuss your concerns in the talk page of the article. Szolnok95 Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave your edits (what can be supported by facts and I'll add mine.) Szolnok95 (talk) 16:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you to discuss your concerns in the talk page of the article. Not here.

Your edits were unsourced. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond on the Untermensch talk page. Szolnok95 (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi.

can you read what I write here? Belomaad (talk) 18:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Political views of Adolf Hitler

Please read articles carefully before adding content, as nearly all of what you contributed recently to the Political views of Adolf Hitler page is already covered with RS material, which has been carefully vetted. My advice is also for you to find pages that need substantive content expansion, not ones thoroughly worked already with loads of sources, particularly on this sensitive subject area. You are not making the distinction between the development of "political views" and his general worldview, which is content more fitting for his biography—another subject already thoroughly covered. In fact, maybe you should consider starting a page on his "worldview" (Weltanschauung) and make it a subject unto itself. Just a suggestion. Obenritter (talk) 16:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you even claiming? Those contents were explicitly his core political views and within the scope of that article.

I suggest you discuss your concerns in the article page. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 17:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the Talk Page on the article. Just FYSA, what you added was already more or less pretty well-covered in the content...a few things you added could be included, provided they get properly integrated and contextualized. Nonetheless, I have included some additional expert editors in the discussion in hopes of finding an amenable solution. If you are unable to provide additional contextualization that makes the content you added fit better, I can do it at some point for your edification. Maybe it is a necessary lesson in collaboration for both of us and/or perhaps one of the other editors (among those I pinged) will see a better solution.--Obenritter (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I appreciate your attempt at civility. Just FYSA, I am a bit of an expert on the subject we're discussing, since modern Germany was a sub-specialty for my PhD. In fact, I have actually collaborated with some fairly recognizable names, but I am not here to gaslight. You were right to spell things out a little more on anti-Slavism, but I still maintain this new material needs to be better integrated with the existing content and a section on anti-Slavism makes more sense than the approach you've taken. Please try to follow the citation format being used on the page in the future. Regards and happy editing. --Obenritter (talk) 21:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, after looking at this some more, I think it will be fine with some editorial clean-up and contextualization. My efforts will certainly need a second set of eyes once complete, but your additions were not nearly as problematic as I originally presumed. I think when I saw the inclusion of non-RS like Carruthers, I went into a tailspin more than required. --Obenritter (talk) 22:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salaf Query

The recent discussion got me thinking about the self-identification of the group as "Salafists" in the sense of making me wonder how far this went back. The group has existed since the 18th century, but on the Salafism page, that group has only existed since the 19th century, so did the former only identify as Salafists following the emergence of the latter in the subsequent century, or did they use the same term for themselves based on the "Salaf" base term at an earlier date? Iskandar323 (talk) 14:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iskandar323

Well, the term "Salafi" has been used by Sunni Athari theologians to refer to whom they regarded as righteous scholars as early as the 3rd or 4th Islamic centuries. Thus, the term "Salafi" is found in various treatises and biographical dictionaries of classical Athari theologians. Ibn Taymiyya's writings contain references about a scholarly faction known as "Salafis". Ibn Taymiyya often emphasized about "Salafiyyah", "mad'hab al-Salafiyya", "tariqa al-Salafiyya", etc. Contemporary Salafis use these references to assert that a Salafi community existed for more than a 1000 years.

But as far as I know, the usage of the term "Salafi" as a communal identity began only around 150 years ago, with the emergence of the Arab Salafi movement in Iraq, Syria and Egypt. The activists and scholarly reformers of the Arab Salafiyya movement probably used this identity as a way to distinguish themselves from the state-sponsored religious expression promoted by the Ottoman clergy during that time. I have not seen a single source (academic or primary) where the term "Salafi" was used as a communal identity before that.

I hope my summary was helpful. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 09:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadowwarrior8

could you please help me with the umm Kulthum bint Ali article. Albertatiran has been vandalising and reverting everyone’s edits Belomaad (talk) 20:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Rafida. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 18:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination

Hello! You currently have a good article nomination waiting for review, but you haven't edited in a while. Are you still available to respond to a reviewer when the review begins, or should the nomination be reverted so you can renominate at a later date? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Far-right extremism has been nominated for merging

Category:Far-right extremism has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MSMST1543 (talk) 08:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Far-right extremists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Far-right extremists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nazi racial theories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Gross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]