User talk:Ronruser

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ronruser! My name is Jonathunder. I just wanted to say howdy and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or press the "Request Help" button at the bottom of this message. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some pages that will help you edit Wikipedia:

How to edit a page

Sandbox, a place where you can experiment

Tutorial

What this site is based on

Where to ask questions

Wikipedia's style manual

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or press the "Request Help" button below. Again, welcome!

Ronruser, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ronruser! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parliamentary Procedure WikiProject

Thank you for the work you have been doing on the Robert's Rules article. Wikipedia has a Parliamentary Procedure Project which may be of interest to you. Cheers. Jonathunder (talk) 16:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathunder I took your suggestion and ran with it... Thanks! Ronruser (talk) 03:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re List of books with Robert's Rules in the title

Hi. On the assumption that you're still working on this, it might be worthwhile putting a {{Template:In creation}} on it so that it doesn't get flagged by a reviewer. Cheers, Hydronium Hydroxide (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Majority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simple majority. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of templates

Hello and welcome. Regarding this edit, the convention is to omit the "Template:" when using article-space templates. Thus {{WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure}}, not ~~{{Template:WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure}}~~. See Help:Template. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 07:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meeting (parliamentary procedure)

The article Meeting (parliamentary procedure) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This seems to be original research - items from Roberts Rules are presented as if they apply to all parliaments, without any evidence to justify this implicit claim. It needs to be properly sourced and also carefully qualified. Or deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andyjsmith (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

There's a clear process for merging articles, explained at WP:MERGE. I'd be grateful if you would follow it, including tagging the pages so other people know what you propose, informing significant contributors, and waiting 30 days to see if anyone objects. Andyjsmith (talk) 17:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I thought these merges were obvious and uncontroversial. I'll hold off doing any more for now. Ronruser (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ronruser. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ronruser. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your recent editing history at Robert's Rules of Order shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message and thanks for helping get the page temporarily locked. Hopefully I can get this issue resolved with this editor. Ronruser (talk) 23:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of Dispute Resolution Notice

I have opened a review of our Robert's Rules issues at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Robert's_Rules_of_Order. Please kindly review and provide your perspective. Sakuranohi (talk) 21:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Sakuranohi[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!)Sakuranohi (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added my summary. Hopefully we can get this issue resolved. Ronruser (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ronruser. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]