User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Re: Sovereign Grace Ministries

The page has now been written up with a full range of references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Look2008 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

edit conflict

I didn't see Miamiboyzinhere's unblock request. I guess there was an edit conflict and I didn't see it. My apologies. Momusufan (talk) 22:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I need semi protection on my Userpage for a while to stop miamiboyzinhere's sockpuppet IP's from wikistalking me, thanks. Momusufan (talk) 22:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I semi-protected for 72 hours. —EncMstr 22:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...

		The PCHS-NJROTC Abuse Report and Antivandal Barnstar
		For your service as a Wikipedia:Abuse reports investigator and contactor!

GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 23:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

87.122.9.6‎

He's moved on to 87.122.8.119. I have a request for page protection in.--Dr who1975 (talk) 02:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks... now it's 87.122.4.208‎. Can the whole 87.122 node be blocked?--Dr who1975 (talk) 02:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I also created Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#3 more pages stalked by User:Breathtaker but he's waring on more than the just the 3 pages Ilisted.--Dr who1975 (talk) 02:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Currently on 87.122.4.208 Momusufan (talk) 02:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't forget, Mr. Admin. There are two other assholes with more than three edits. --87.122.5.70 (talk) 02:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

In caee you needed any further convincing... Breathtaker has supplied the comment above.--Dr who1975 (talk) 02:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Now he's on 87.122.5.70 Momusufan (talk) 02:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

http://samspade.org/whois/87.122.5.70 the range is 87.122.0.0 to 87.122.255.255 just so everyone knows. Momusufan (talk) 02:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• I'm working on a range block right now. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Momusufan (talk) 02:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

IP sock is now on 87.122.3.147 Momusufan (talk) 02:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Range block

Ok, thats good. Thank you. Momusufan (talk) 02:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help Rjd0060.--Dr who1975 (talk) 02:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

158.123.163.16

Please re-examine 158.123.163.16. No recent edits?

[[1]]

Am I misreading this, or is this less than three hours old? Thanks for your attention. JTRH (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

POV tags someone else added were removed...

Hi Rjd0060,

I was hoping that you would add back in at least the POV tags added by Xiutwel to the September 11, 2001 Attacks page. If you check the last edit on there, you'll see that it undid two edits which I made. If you feel that they were justified, I'd appreciate revert. If not, can you help me understand why they aren't? Thanks, Dscotese (talk) 01:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

• The POV tags can wait another week, that's no problem. But, if you feel inpartial to this debate, I would like to invite you to help solve it. I'll start a new section for discussion.  — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 18:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NewWJBKlogo.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:NewWJBKlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

My request for bureaucratship

Dear Rjd0060, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :)
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 04:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing the archive bot on Big Brother 9 (U.S.). It works perfectly now. I even have a bot archiving my page now. I didn't know how handy it was. Anyway thanks again. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 05:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Ice Hockey March 2008 Newsletter

WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter Dear Rjd0060/Archive 5! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been many more new things going on at WP:HOCKEY; this newsletter will be sent every two weeks/months. If you wish to not receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the newsletter mailing list. Thanks! New recognized content By The Pancake of Heaven! There has been numerous new recognized content, so much that it's too time-consuming to sift through the "trophy cases" on WP:HOCKEY. Some interesting achievements: 2016 NHL Draft has been newly created and has immediately become a GA status article. The Vancouver Canucks task force has become active again, thanks to Canuckian89! J.D. Watt has been declined at WP:AFD. Drafts related to the OHL have been published! Task forces By The Pancake of Heaven! We are working to create a new task force within the WikiProject to deal with topics related to the Pittsburgh Penguins. It hasn't been created yet; but it aims to expand articles based on former and current Pittsburgh Penguins players and articles. Good luck! New Administrators Currently 0 promoted admins! Be the first one at WP:RFA. Featured Topic Drive By Maxim The original featured topic drive, initiated by Scorpion0422, has concluded succesfully. National Hockey League awards is now a featured topic, with 24 articles in total. Of them, 20 are featured lists, one is a featured article, and the other three are trophy articles that were too short to become featured lists. Eight users signed up to help out, shown here. The next Featured Topic hasn't been decided upon, and the ideas and organization for it fell apart. If you have any ideas, don't hesitate to share them at WT:HOCKEY. Notes More editors are needed to help out with the newsletter. The newsletter creator doesn't have an infinite nor perfect supply of ideas, and thus he might omit some interesting news. Portal:Ice hockey is being considered for featured status. Should Chris Pronger have been suspended for more than eight games for stomping on Ryan Kesler? Vote here! Help Patrik Stefan -- one of the greatest NHL draft busts -- become a GA status article.

Note: You have received this because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. MonoBot (talk) 18:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Question?

Hi, long time no talk :) I have a question, I thought sandboxes or user sub-pages were for the sole purpose of helping/bettering a Wikipedia article? Remember User:ScottAHudson well I noticed he has a lot of subpages related to various reality shows. The Big Brother test pages he has looks like copies/replicas of Big Brother 3 (U.S.), Big Brother 4 (U.S.), Big Brother 7 (U.S.) and Big Brother 9 (U.S.) with the voting history table he suggested during Big Brother 8 (U.S.) but a consensus was reached to continue using the current one? Does these test pages violate Wikipedia rules. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 00:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah okay, thanks I just wasn't sure if it was acceptable or not. Thanks. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 01:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. That was bugging me since I left that message on his talk page a couple of days ago. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 01:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

My Pages

You can go ahead and delete the following sub-pages:

• Survivor: All-Stars Test
• Big Brother 3 & 7 Tests

ScottAHudson (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Couple things

I have an alternate logo taken from recent episodes on my computer that doesn't have the "'Till Death Do You Part" subtitle. Do you want me to upload it seperate or just have it replace the current image? I think that is good idea since other projects do it. What do you think about a starting a newsletter? I have been thinking about doing it since other projects have one. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 21:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Update: I have went through all the articles relating to Big Brother and I have tagged all images. I think a newsletter is necessary after seeing some of the other countries articles. I mean the US, UK, Australia, Philippines, and somewhat Africa looks presentable. For the rest eck! Most of the articles have duplicate information from the fan site worldofbigbrother.com and a lot of the tables don't follow the guidelines for a nominations/voting history table. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Fixed the image, it is cropped similar to BB1-BB7 US. If you want I can upload the entire screenshot like in BB8? ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I just went ahead and uploaded the full image. It does look better. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 00:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Here is the newsletter I created. It's part of our new Outreach department. Other projects with a newsletter had Outreach departments so I thought why not us. I just need to get a bot to distribute it now. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

My Pages - Part 2

I would like to also recommend the deletion of Amazing Race 12 Test. Others will be requested for deletion two months after they are finished. ScottAHudson (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

User Talk page

Thats what i was meaning to do simi protect it so anon users can edit it Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 23:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Staate00

I see you've previously dealt w/ the abovementioned user for his vandalism. I recently reverted a highly offensive edit he made to the Yeshivish Jews article. Please check it out and take the necessary steps. Thank you. Keyed In (talk) 05:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

WHAT!!?!?!?

I haven't attacked ANYONE.

My gosh, I have reminder HTML-commented stuff on my USER PAGE. Why are you editing my user page? Where is the attack? Your comments are unwarranted and ridiculous. Timneu22 (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

You're being hypocritical. Calling someone's comments ridiculous isn't a very civil thing to do, and is essentially, an attack. Maxim_(talk) 22:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

What's the deal? It is ridiculous that I'm accused of anything when I haven't done anything on anyone's talk page, and I'm being accused of incivility. What did I do to deserve this treatment? Timneu22 (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Be uncivil, possibly? Maxim_(talk) 01:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I just left a request to block IP 91.105.221.196 due to the Big Brother 9 edits plus several edits he made to my talk page. Thanks for reacting so quickly. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy easter!

Open your card >> >> >>

Happy easter you guys! Sorry if the picture looked crappy, but it's the best I could do on such short notice. Sincerely, BoL (Talk) 04:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Credits: This card was inspired by BoL, an administrator/bureaucrat and head designer of Codesnippets. Join the community today!

Rjd0060 (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Question?

Is it wrong for a user (registered or not) to change the replies that one person lives on their own talk page? 91.105.221.196 did that after I left a kind reply. The change here [2] and his reply to me after he changed my reply [3]. I feel really offended by this it is like he/she put words in my mouth. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again. I will be sure to do that in the future. Thanks again :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 18:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know that 91.105.221.196 has vandalized Big Brother 9 (U.S.) again. I have given this user a only warning for their edits. I also reverted some of his comments on your talk page as they were acts of vandalism. (ie. changing my signature and calling me swear-paints) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Question 2

Why was I indefinitely blocked? Was it because of username? And when will new account be activated and old account expire after a requested name change? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NW Film Center (talk • contribs) 22:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

Cream (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

16:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Descent 2 - semi protection of D2X-XL chapter rejected

The D2X-XL chapter of the Descent 2 article has been a target for plain vandalism or malevolent changes of its content for over a year. The issue has just started to get heated today, when a few people involved with the Descent community had decided to take this to a new level and mark the chapter as advertisement, restoring the mark whenever I remove it. You may want to take a look at that chapter. If you decide it's an advertisement, I will accept the decision. The people currently at work are however acting out of a deep personal resentment against me, and the Wikipedia entry is only a vehicle for their destructivity. FYI: Here is a link to a thread of the biggest English speaking Descent community forum, where the issue is discussed: http://www.descentbb.net/viewforum.php?f=37

Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

You might want to talk to the person who actually declined the protection request, User:Master of Puppets. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, ok. I'm pretty much a Wikipedia noob, thanks.

Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies

Regarding the NFRA dispute in the mediation cabal, do I need to be doing anything else to facilitate the dialogue? CorpITGuy (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Question

Your response at WP:RFA. Does that mean my talk page is semi-protected or were just saying that one IP was blocked? AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

NM, while writing this I see you posted at RFA. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Freaky

Check the log. How weird is that? Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Graphology

Pseudo daoist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) still has troubles understanding what vandalism means: "When the edits are deliberately disruptive, then it is vandalism." 190.51.135.192 (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC) (see his talk page)

While that statement is true, those edits aren't vandalism, and he fails to assume good faith. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Helen Shivers

I see you deleted the article, but you've yet to close the AFD. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: 21656???!!!

Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to WP:21655 is way too smart to be fooled by that sort of trickery. 21655 ^τalk/ _ʃign 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

SPA

I am only an SPA because Don Murphy has harassed editors in the past when it comes to editing his article. For instance, H left because of this harassment. I explained my goal in editing as a SPA at Talk:Don Murphy/Archive2 as well as at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Don Murphy and Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Don Murphy. Please try to assume good faith that I am trying to establish Don Murphy's notability without being harassed. RTFA (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:ABUSE

I know the policy is to only accept complaints about IPs blocked at least 5 times, but I'm seeing quite a few complaints about IPs with three and four blocks. Should I decline those, or would it be okay to accept them? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment from some guy

Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! Mikey-is-Lost 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs)

Some GUY!!!!!! I am that person who you kept blocking for no reason what so ever............ remember !!! it wasnt even me who was deleting things.... have you got memory loss or somthin????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 17:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I still have no idea who you are. Want to give me your old username? - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I just had an ip address..... how can you not remember me...... my friend like changed that alucard persons comment he left on my talk page.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 18:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Though it may be because im not using my home computer that I was blocked, I still send my thanks.--Neofcon (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Kitten?

You can has kitten? нмŵוτнτ 15:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I maded u a pikchur ~ Riana ⁂ 15:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

Cream (talk) has put a trout your back! The Trout promotes playfulness and hopefully this one has made your day worse. You have no choice but to spread it to other editors! Happy April Fools' Day!
Add this {{subst:AprilFoools}} to their talk page with a friendly fish. 14:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Big Brother Kids (U.S.)

Look at this. There is an article named Big Brother Kids (U.S.). Nice April Fools joke isn't it. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 11:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I figured, someone really loves April Fools :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Block evasion

A user you blocked for 3RR yesterday, 70.108.82.109, started editing from another IP, 70.108.103.64, before the block was up and is continuing their disruptive editing. I don't like to be a tattletale but sometimes you gotta. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 17:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 14:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Birlinn unblock

Could you please be a little more careful? You just unblocked this person so that they could change their name to: the same name (a corporate one) that was blocked in the first place! --Orange Mike | Talk 15:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, excrement eventuates. It turned out well, fortunately. Thanks for trying to help. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:Lectures on the 6th

Kim is starting the lectures on April 6th around 15:00 UTC (although that is apparently open to discussion). Just a reminder... Xavexgoem (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Request

You semi-protected my user page. Thank you. But now, I'd appreciate it if you unprotected. Or should I just undo your edit? Thanks. Me what do u want? _{Your Hancock Please} 00:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

House Calls article finished

I finally have finished the House Calls article. It is detailed and is loaded down with verifiable references. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

It even has a nice shinny logo as well :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology

I see Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology was deleted, but I was more puzzled to find Hersfold (talk · contribs) removing all incoming links. Hersfold says that he was acting on your request. To be sure, there is little doubt that FASEB is notable, and I'm therefore not convinced that all the links need to be removed. Could you clarify the situation? JFW | T@lk 00:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree, this was a really unnecessary action. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology is perfectly valid and important article (also indicated by the number of wikilinks). You should not remove redlinks, and redirects simply because an article was deleted due to copyvio issues. The article was recreated immediately with non-copyvio content. Please take your time to check each case individually! Also, please try to remember all deleted redirects and reinstate them. Thanks, Сасусlе 02:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

(cross posted) Sorry to the 3 of you for the confusion. Yes, I deleted the article as a complete copyright violation. The links that were removed by Hersfold, was after I had asked him to do it, as my tool wasn't functioning properly. In this specific case, the links did not have to be removed and it may have in fact been best to leave them, to allow for recreation of the article without copyright violations. My apologies for this error, and thanks for bringing it to my attention. - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Great, thanks. JFW | T@lk 09:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Lectures

The lecture has started. irc.freenode.net, #wikipedia-en-lectures

--Kim Bruning (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey

When wikipedia starts blocking racists i wont need to. Hes vandalised my talk page for days already. Realist2 (talk) 01:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

DXCJ

Let me know if there are any I missed. The socks all seem to be blocked now. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Tighina

I notice you have blocked the page Bender, Moldova from being moved by the request of Mikkalai. That user has abused his powers in previously protecting the page.

Refer to the Wikipedia protection policy at Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Move_protection:

"administrators should avoid favoring one name over another, and protection should not be considered an endorsement of the current name."

However Mikkalai has stated that: "This is the official name of the city, according to the evidence presented. Period" in order to justify his actions.

There was previously a proposal to move the page, however it ended with no consensus. This definitely doesn't favour either name. I would be interested to hear your reasons for further protecting the page at his request. Rapido (talk) 10:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

What do you suggest we do to address User:Calton's tagging?

Calton continues, I randomly pulled user out of Calton's many spam warning contributions over the past day and got this one: User_talk:Billseidle - the user has never been blocked, let alone indef blocked. Should I start a separate WP:AN thread to address this issue? What are your recommendations? Calton never responded to your request for an explanation.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 23:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Have you ever left a note on his talk page, asking him why he does it? . . . (posted at User talk:Doug)

Most certainly, you will recall this recent post by me at Wikipedia:AN#Talk_pages_for_indef_users (which we agreed was slightly off topic) :

Well, no offense Calton, but I know you commonly tag userpages as spam and then add {{temporary userpage}} to their talk pages. Several admins have addressed this issue with you before, including me, but we apparently have a clear difference of opinion over the proper usage of {{temporary userpage}}. (See User_talk:Calton#Temporary_userpage.3F, User_talk:Calton#Template:temporary_userpage, User_talk:Calton#Tagging_user_pages_of_unblocked_users, User_talk:Calton#Template:temporary_userpage_2). If I notice these I review them. Some of these are in fact indef blocked and don't have an indef block tag, so the {{temporary userpage}} tag is valid. Others have never been blocked, let alone indef blocked. If you look at CAT:TEMP you'll probably find that many, if not most, usertalkpages are due to {{temporary userpage}} on the talk page - though I'm not saying they're all there due to Calton - I have no idea. Alternatively, [4] will give a good starting place if you go through the ones tagged as spam in particular (Calton puts the template in the edit summary so this is pretty easy). --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 23:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

There are four notices to Calton there, comprising the concerns of five separate admins, the last one is mine. When Calton replies, it sounds like "Don't complain to me, I just tag them, complain to the admins who are deleting" - that's a paraphrase not a quote. Of course, the complaining parties are the admins. In at least one case, the third one above, Calton appears to convince the admin that he doesn't understand policy and should be deleting these. There is at least one other notice on his page regarding inappropriate use of CSD against user talk pages too. Calton's attitude seems to be that these pages don't belong here so I won't stop tagging them. I'm a new admin and don't really know the best way to handle this, several very experienced admins seem to have given up already. Problem is, from that AN thread we have evidence that some admins have been just cleaning out the queue and maybe not always noticing whether the user was actually indef blocked (of all the tags that I'm aware of that feed CAT:TEMP, {{temporary userpage}} is the only one that is not clearly an indef blocked tag) --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 23:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

So, any thoughts on this?--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 15:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Look at this

When you thought fake BB articles were no more. → Big Brother Canada it has been tagged. Vandalism I say. Pure hoax. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 02:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I have no idea where these articles are coming from first BB Kids then BB Canada. At this point if CBS says they are having an CBB edition I wouldn't believe them. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 03:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Realist2

Another admin (not me) has unblocked Realist2 following this debate: [5]. I'm really sorry if this has offended you, but I believe after our chat on IRC last night that you were open to the possibility of reassessing the situation in the light of more information being made available. I think that a simple error was made in good faith, actually several simple errors, including some by the user. I hope we can fix the issue and that I have not dumped you in the shit as a result. Sincere apologies if you are unhappy about this, I was only trying to help. Guy (Help!) 11:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:Lectures

#wikipedia-en-lectures @ 15:00 UTC today, yay. Xavexgoem (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Vonita

He canvassed once.[6] I warned him to stop it.[7] He blanked it.[8]

He sent me an attacking message "You are a page blanking vandal. That is all you are and all you ever will be." But what disturbs me the most is that a user who has not made even 50 edits yet tells me to read WP:MOS.[9] I find it futile to warn him again as he has blanked one. Ultra! 14:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry you have been dragged into this and I do not know why he has chosen to involve you since he went to WP:ANI and I replied there.

I copy my reply here as well:

First of all, it is she not he. Secondly, I am taking my time to read all Wikipedia policies before I make substantive edits. It's a pity he does not since he manages to annoy. It is deplorable that he comes running to WP:ANI. As for the comment about him being a Page Blanking Vandal, that is a true statement of fact. He has been blocked twice from Wikipedia for being a page blanking vandal. That all came out in his humilliating attempt to become a Wikipedia Admin. Read the RfA to see how united people were against his application. It was not canvassing to inform User:Maddyfan about this [[10]]. Note the comments made by User:hbdragon88 about Vikrant Phadkay's outbursts of temper and acts of vandalism that led him twice to being blocked from Wikipedia. (he changed his screen name to Ultraviolet scissor flame).

Maddyfan at that point was in dispute with him and had warned him about being blocked again. Look here User talk:Ultraviolet scissor flame/Archive 3#Madonna.

I warned Vikrant Phadkay not to leave rude messages on my Talk Page again as did user:emerson 7, look here User talk:Ultraviolet scissor flame/Archive 4#i have been warned?.

He was the one who first left an attack message on my page. As for "blanking", he removed my message from his talk page and it was only afterwards that I removed his message from mine.

Look at his Talk Page User talk:Ultraviolet scissor flame/Archive 4 to see how many warnings he has received from other editors and how many photos, he uploaded, have been deleted from Wikipedia because of copyright violations.

He needs to learn that if he is nice to others then others will be nice to him and if he is rude to others then others will be rude to him. That is how life is.

Vonita (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure how I am involved in this either, and since it has went to AN/I, I am not going to comment. -

Rjd0060 (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hagger

I noticed that you have been deleting articles with this title. According to what I have seen the user creating these articles is likely a sockpuppet of the banned user User:Grawp. See Special:Contributions/Grawp for more details. Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 05:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

chandu v. the bad bot

Chandu thanks you for reverting the mistagging. Image:ChanduTheMagician.jpg. EraserGirl (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

• Can you explain something small? Your comment on the Incidents page "Actually, the image isn't being used, as evident from the empty "File links" section on the Image description page. " Confuses me. as the image has always been linked to the article and vice versa. I didn't fix the link and it doesn't appear that you did, so how was it ever empty? EraserGirl (talk) 04:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Well then you are in error, the image has been displayed ON the page since it was added, not just linked but actually appeared in the infobox. I can see if the image size was incorrect there might be a problem but it didn't prevent the image from actually being seen and yes the file link was actually THERE when I checked all the info on the image page after the bot tagged it. Perhaps you are confused. No matter it is all fixed now. Thanks again for fixing the tag. EraserGirl (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

For reverting the vandalism on my talk page, have a cookie

// Finns has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

// Finns 18:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:Lectures

Today (Apr 20th), around 15:00 UTC! Possibly on Skype, but certainly on IRC (#wikipedia-en-lectures on freenode)! I don't actually know about the Skype details... Message me on Skype (xavexgoem) about that, if you have it (no harm in getting it, either), and then maybe by that time I'll have a clue :-p Xavexgoem (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

User talk:212.219.115.245‎

Hi Ryan, hasn't vandalised after my previous warning; do you think a block is right here? --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

I've refactored your comment, only to spell my name right ;-) . I've replied on your talk page. - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Hadn't seen later attacks; apologies. Must update my cache more often! --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

The evidence you requested

Maybe not all Red Wings fans are vandals, but clearly a good portion of you are. ;) Enigma ^message Review 04:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Afghan Historian

Hey, Actually I only briefly came back to correct some absurd references in a "Middle East" article about Pakistan. I wasn't intending on coming back for good. That won't happen until real free time comes back again, lol. I finished my corrections and am leaving again. If it could be protected again, that would be great. Thanks! Afghan Historian (talk) 12:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Well I stopped editing since last night so consider my role on wikipedia over for now. I promise you will not see me again on wikipedia so I would still like my page to be protected and retired again, if that is still possible. ;) Afghan Historian (talk) 20:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I checked back and its still unprotected. If you could please protect my page again, I would love it. Thanks! Afghan Historian (talk) 00:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Graphology

i´ve recovered what there was in his: Pseudo daoist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) talk page because it seems like that is not an "old talk" that should be delete, especially by his lasts editions this month, especially the "minor edit". I expect that be ok what i´ve done and that there isn´t a rule against that. 190.51.136.148 (talk) 20:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you are talking about. - Rjd0060 (talk) 20:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I am talking about the last edition i made in his talk page 190.51.135.216 (talk) 20:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Please consider Dispute Resolution. - Rjd0060 (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams

Why did you fully protect the page? I can understand a semi-protect, but a full is absurd. Every other article about the Playboy "playmates" that I have seen here on Wikipedia includes the disputed information. While I disagree with the tactics employed by a certain editor, I agree with his basic point. Playboy is a reliable source for articles about the "playmates," unless someone can make a darn good argument as to why it's not, in my opinion.

I guess I'm not asking you to unprotect the page. I am asking you to restore the information that was being disputed because, in the end, it is accurate and it is standard information for articles of this nature. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

You're right. I misread the history. My apologies. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 00:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Roald als title page

Hi Ryan, I was searching the Wikipedia talk:How to edit a page for information about a slight problem that I needed to fix, but couldn't find an answer. I saw your sig in the history section and decided to ask an admin directly. I created an article page recently but failed to capitalize the title name. (I confess that I am an idiot, but I have a sneaking suspicion that this is a fairly common problem.) Is it possible to correct this with a simple page edit -- or will I need to recreate an entirely new page under the correctly capitalized name and then submit the older version for deletion? CactusWriter (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response, Ryan. I very much appreciate the easy solution and your help.CactusWriter (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Recent deletion

I would ask that you reconsider the deletion of James Smith (footballer born September 1985) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) due to an "expired WP:PROD", as the article was previously retained as a result of a unanimous consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Smith (footballer born September 1985). Thanks. John254 13:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky

17:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

The Puppy Place

Hi, you closed the above article as delete on April 24th, but you didn't delete Read all about Dogs like Lizze! which was also nominated for deletion. Cunard (talk) 17:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Your pp-semi on Petroleum

Subj lapsed 23 April and was bot-removed. The IPvandals are of course right back at it. This topic seems to be the subject of an ongoing campaign from major lobby groups though of course that can be tough to prove for an ordinary editor. LeadSongDog (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you.LeadSongDog (talk) 19:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Unprotect article

I would like to request that the Battle of the Forward Defence Lines article be unprotected. The edit war between me and Watchdogb has been partialy resolved, we have decided to continue our edits of Wikipedia through discussion and to not start a brawl. Thank you. Top Gun 16:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

What I ment by partialy resolved was that we have agreed not to edit war anymore over the article and accept the other ones edits if they are backed up by sources.Top Gun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.170.203 (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of page on Kate Bush's The Phoenix Recordings"

You deleted this without bringing it up for any discussion. Please restore it. A simple Google search for "Kate Bush" and "The Phoenix Recordings" yields 408,000 hits, most not on fan web sites. These recordings are significant and well-known among Bush's fans. K8 fan (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

It's back

Big Brother Kids is back but in a new form. Instead of a fake Big Brother (U.S.) article it is now a fake Big Brother (UK) article. Maybe this title should be protected after deletion. It seems it's creator User:Edsue123 also created a hoax Star Academy article. Make of it what you will I find it kinda amusing. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 07:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:User talk:Runescape111

In the future, if an account like the one above is a vandalism-only account, just block it indefinitely, no need to pick random time-spans to block blatantly obvious vandalism-only accounts. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 06:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

It's no big deal, I just saw "6 years" and it made me curious. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 18:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Just a reminder that the Ashley Alexandra Dupre article is due to be unlocked today

Thank you — Justmeherenow (   ) 15:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Mudhouse Mansion

Hi -- I wonder if you might reconsider the deletion of Mudhouse Mansion. It's mentioned on several WP articles, and I sunk a fair amount of work into it, as it's a good example for folkloristics. It gets 1410 google hits, and really does (IMHOP) pass the notability test. Somehow, I failed to put it on my watchlist, or I'd have offered input long before the deletion notice expired. Thanks, DavidOaks (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the quick response! DavidOaks (talk) 03:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, fixed.

Your tag on Thomas Fleckenstein at the RFPP page wasn't displaying at all, which is why I fixed it. I went to add a notation that it was already protected when I saw your malformed tag. Please don't get all bent out of shape over it. Horologium (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Tibet during the Ming Dynasty

Point taken on my repeated reversions in this article today. I am stopping. But can we get an administrator to look at this a little more closely? If you look at the quality of the article, and you look at the quality of User:LaGrandefr's edits in both the main article and the talk page, you'll see that User:LaGrandefr's edits are tantamount to vandalism. Several users have tried repeatedly to reason with him and advise him, but he generally seems not even to understand what is going on. It looks to me like some mixture of ill will and incompetence on User:LaGrandefr's part. As such, I reverted his edits today without comment, as is commonly done to unconstructive edits. Bertport (talk) 16:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

History tab

Why doesn't the article Editing Pillars of Literacy have a history tab? Mooncrest (talk) 20:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I just read in someone's talk page what you wrote and I looked at it and there was no history page.Mooncrest (talk) 21:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi there, thanks for using the mop to wipe up the article I prodded; much appreciated. Coldmachine^Talk 02:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Naming Standards

Then the account is blocked for the wrong reason. --Lemmey talk 04:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

If its not the issue the account should be unblocked and blocked for the right reason. We do strive for quality here. --Lemmey talk 04:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 04:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Um...

In what universe is the phone number of a jail "personal information"? Jails aren't people. --Random832 (contribs) 16:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Pageantry Articles

I am currently updating new and existing articles with girls who have compete in an Arizona pageant, and was wondering why the former queen Ariel Sorensen was deleted? I have more information reguarding a charity she has started and would like to undelete this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AZPageants (talk • contribs) 20:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Ariel Sorensen

Can you please tell me what the deal with restoring this article was? As far as I can tell noone removed the prod before it was deleted. Thanks. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 21:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, I just saw the comment above mine. But it came well after the deadline for the prod expired at 2008-05-02 23:52. I guess if it were a borderline case it would be worth restoring it but for such a clear case of a notability violation I don't understand why you'd restore it. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 22:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Malin to Mizen

I have only just noticed that this page has been deleted - presumably because it was on no-one's watchlist (certainly not on mine). I noticed it because a link has turned into a redlink on a page on my watchlist. I was a bit surprised - I quickly found another redlink, and a quick Google search throws up a lot of evidence that it is a recognised route. Was the creator of the page was notified? Has anyone checked the links? I would vote for restoring it.Mhockey (talk) 19:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

prod

since prodded articles can be undeleted on request, please undelete Corran Horn, and, if you shoose send it to AfD. Of course, I can undelete it myself, if you'd rather.DGG (talk) 23:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC) -- thaqnks DGG (talk) 03:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

lol, yeah, I actually remembered that after I posted it but yeah semi-protection is what I meant. ;) thanks buddy --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 23:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Hindemburg Melão Jr.

I saw that you deleted this article because of an expired prod. I basically supported the prod but I am a little surprised by what happened. I thought that I saw in my watchlist earlier today that some IP editor removed the prod (and, if I remember correctly the edit summary, removed the notability tag as well) and that then User:Tosqueira restored the notability tag. As I said, I am personally in favor of deleting the article but would like to make sure that it was done correctly in the procedural sense. I could be wrong and maybe that IP editor did not actually remove the prod but only the notability tag. I did not actually look at the article when this was happening and only saw the edit summaries in my watchlist. In any event, could you please double-check? Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Pink (Mindless Self Indulgence album)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pink (Mindless Self Indulgence album). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. EarthBoundX5 (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Critical Watch

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Critical Watch. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Nelsonbu (talk) 20:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Brandon Patton

This is Brandon Patton himself, inquiring as to why my page was deleted. A fan of mine created the page, and I noticed earlier that it was considered "insufficienty notable" but I believe myself and others added footnotes to the best of our not very-wiki-savvy abilities to save the page. I would be happy to provide better footnotes to the page. I have been composing and performing for 13 years, producing albums, a rock musical in New York City, followed around by a documentary film crew, and won awards. What is considered sufficiently notable?Phlounder (talk) 00:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)phlounder

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NotSarenne (2nd)

Could you please block TimTomTom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for blatant disruption and evading a ban based on the sockpuppet report linked above? I'm asking you because you happen to be active now. Thanks. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 16:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Lev Yilmaz

Hi, I noticed you deleted the article on Lev Yilmaz. I missed the PROD because I accidentally added "Lev Yilmaz" to my watchlist instead of "L E V." I've been meaning to fix that article up for a while, and I'm pretty sure I can find external links indicating notability. He's won multiple awards in independent film festivals. Could you restore the article to my sandbox so I can try to fix it up? I'll make sure to look through the notability requirements on filmmakers before I attempt to restore it. Thanks, FCSundae ∨^☃ (talk) 23:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi,

Just wondering why Comb Paddock was deleted, thanks. Fynci Mynci (talk) 14:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Undeletion of Nilsson Awards Page

I would like to propose undeletion because a lot has been added to the only source, including a history of the awards and the author. if this article is nominated for deletion again I will look for more evidence of it's notability. thank you. Hooty88888 (talk) 23:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

{{subst:DRVNote|Nilsson Awards} Hooty88888 (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for 6th Annual Nilsson Awards for Film

An editor has asked for a deletion review of 6th Annual Nilsson Awards for Film. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hooty88888 (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: RE: Your request for rollback

Thanks, I saw that.--  LYKANTROP  10:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Guidance Barnstar
		A little something for helping me when i have needed it over these many months. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 14:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Swayne's Rats and Cats

If I can find sources beyond Groucho's tale, I'll be uploading it again. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 03:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Addshore

Hey there, I think you might want to slightly edit your support comment - see my support for details. Cheers! —Travis^talk 00:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Please restore The Einstein Academy as a contested WP:Prod

thx, Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Raquel Evita Saraswati (Seidel)

Why has her former name, marriage, and religious heritage been deleted? These are all common, mundane, non-libelous elements of a biography. How do they violate the BLP guidelines?

If this persists, I will bring it up with Jimbo. If the wikipedia bureaucrats are skewing information, this is a serious matter indeed.

You have NOT stated how the information deleted violates the BLP guidelines. Why has her former name, marriage, and religious heritage been deleted? Virtually all wikipedia biographies contain this information; Carlos Memen for example. Plus, all of this information is public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.34.208 (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Because you cannot add unconfirmed information to a biography article. But the information IS confirmed. The marriage is a matter of public record. Her other name has been confirmed -- by herself on Wikipedia no less, and in other places -- as being her other name. Her religious affiliation during college is noted in public records (scholarship announcements in an offline newspaper) as well. So, please explain to me what information is 'unconfirmed'-- or let the information stand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.34.208 (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Unprotecting PlayStation 3

No offense, but... (Yeah, I know what that means—I'm going to tear you apart but don't be offended :P )

Seriously, I own a PS3 and I know many people who own PS3s and Xbox 360s. I can assure you, PlayStation 3 should probably remain semi-protected until the PS4 comes out (i.e. at least until 2011, probably longer.)

Basically what I am saying is, don't unprotect PlayStation 3. There is no way it will not be vandalized until the PS4 comes out. Even then, I'm not so sure. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I apologize for being so condescending beforehand. I know little of the minutiae of adminship, and maybe it's time I recognize this fact. Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 22:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Signature

s:ko:User:WonRyong/MediaWiki#사용자 서명 기본값 변경

Thank you for that via IRC. :) -- WonRyong (talk) 23:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Tom Hanks

Hi Rjd0060, on requests for page protection, you declined the extension for Ton Hanks, though as you posted it, I had reviewed the page's history and decided to increase it to two weeks. Do you have any objection to the extension, now that it's already been done? Thanks. Acalamari 23:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay then. Thanks for your input. Acalamari 23:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism because you disagree?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Really I'm a vandal because you disagree? What happened to NPOV, and assume good faith? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.4.188 (talk) 00:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Here is the section you seemed to miss "Anonymous edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person should be evaluated carefully. When the subject is of ambiguous notability, such edits should not be regarded as vandalism in the first instance, and recent changes patrollers should bear in mind that they may be dealing with the subject. The use of inflammatory edit summaries or vandalism-related talk-page templates should be avoided." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.4.188 (talk) 00:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

How does it not violate this "Wikipedia also contains biographies of people who, while notable enough for an entry, are not generally well known. In such cases, editors should exercise restraint and include only material relevant to their notability, while omitting information that is irrelevant to the subject's notability." This is why I removed the material. It violates the standard of Wiki bios. I gave reasons, it's not vandalism. 68.34.4.188 (talk) 00:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

"Anonymous edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person should be evaluated carefully." Removing content is appropriate in some circumstances under wiki guide lines. Guidelines I have cited. 68.34.4.188 (talk) 00:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.