User talk:Vivio Testarossa

Zillazmg1998 (talk) 23:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vivio Testarossa's Talk Page

If you wish to comment here, please sign your comments with four tildes ~~~~.
Please add new comments to the bottom of the page.
If you are here about an article I have tagged for deletion, be civil about and state why it should stay.

When sending me E-mails, make sure to write them in English. Email that is written in other languages will be ignored.
You do not need ask me permission to use any of my sandboxes.
Please post all inquiries on my talk page, Emails will likely not be read as quickly as either of the above.
I reserve the right to ignore/remove without archiving comments left here, especially insults/uncivil comments per the above.

Fair Use Statement: Before complaining read this

I scan hundreds of related articles at time, and do not have time to add rationales to images that lack them.
If it's fair use, and doesn't have a rationale, it gets tagged {{Di-no fair use rationale}}. No exceptions.
If I don't know whether it has a rationale or not it goes here.
As I am not an administrator, I do not actually delete images.
If I make a mistake and tag something as not having a rationale, even though it does, feel free to hit me with a trout.

12

This user page has been vandalized 12 times.

wd-4

WikiDefcon Level is Normal.
2.92 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot

Archives

Vivio Testarossa- Talk (Inactive)

1 2 3 4 5 6 P

Sakura Cartelet- talk (Main)

1 2

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

This user may have left Wikipedia. Vivio Testarossa has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1814 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
Are you autoconfirmed?
Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser ^TSU

Gardner-Webb University page

Hello. For several years, there was a section in the Gardner-Webb University page about an athletics scandal that made national news. A few weeks ago, someone deleted it without explanation. I see that it was reinstated today, removed again, and then the page was locked. Now the article reads like it could have been written by the university's PR department. The scandal section could been better written, but the content was accurate. If anything, the person who removed it committed vandalism. I am hoping that, with some added citations, this section about an important part of GWU's history will be left in place. This is only one of many sources which can be easily located via a Google search: [1]

Comment

I apologize for breaking this - which I most assuredly am - but I just wanted to say hi and thanks. Hingleford (talk) 08:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Vivio Testarossa,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vivio Testarossa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]