User talk:Peja mapping

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Oplaza (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Oplaza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peja mapping! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Kosovo War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MUP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Villages near Peja moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Villages near Peja. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,i will look into it and put more sources eventually. Thanks for your contribution! Peja mapping (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know

hi Shellshockersi (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Peja mapping (talk) 08:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello Shellshockersi (talk) 16:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NLA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

e

bros been cooking with the articles that you're dropping –apa SpeedyHaste (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks man ;) Peja mapping (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome :) SpeedyHaste (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 North Kosovo attacks

Hi, I've redirected your article to North Kosovo crisis (2022–2024), as the main topic is already covered in the Ibar-Lepenac canal explosion.

The two hand grenade incidents are not notable; the canal damage is the significant event which has garnered international coverage. The two others, while related, are already mentioned as background information. It doesn't make sense to have two articles dealing with the same topic. Thanks. --Griboski (talk) 14:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable.

Basically the thing that happened was that I started working on the article before I knew that the Ibar-Lepenac canal explosion existed,so what you did makes perfect sense. All the best! Peja mapping (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Peja mapping. Thank you for your work on Besnik Lajçi. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kosovo War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dukagjini.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the insurgency in the Preševo Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lučane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

o

hi SpeedyHaste (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Jezerc

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Battle of Jezerc, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Aircraft chase from Batajnica

Hello Peja mapping, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Aircraft chase from Batajnica, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircraft chase from Batajnica.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Second Serbian Uprising

Scutari, now Shkodër in modern-day Albania) was involved in the events of the Second Serbian Uprising (1815-1817).

During this time, the Ottoman Empire faced significant challenges in maintaining control over its territories in the Balkans, and the Serbian uprising was one of the key regional conflicts. The Pashalik of Scutari, ruled by local Ottoman leaders, was involved in suppressing the uprising, as the Ottoman administration in the Balkans worked to quell the growing nationalist movements.

Scutari was a crucial strategic area due to its position in the northwest of the Ottoman Empire, near the borders with Montenegro and Serbia. While the main military confrontations of the Second Serbian Uprising took place between the Serbian rebels and Ottoman forces in central Serbia, the Pashalik of Scutari played a role by providing troops and resources to help the Ottoman effort. Additionally, local Albanian leaders in the region had their own interests, often aligning with or against Ottoman policies depending on their own local concerns.

So, while the Pashalik of Scutari wasn't at the heart of the uprising, its involvement was part of the broader Ottoman response to the Serbian insurgency during this period.

Also 1000 Arnauts were captured

Thanks for understanding your old friend Pravoslavac(yt) (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understud. Apologies Peja mapping (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing can i know if i can i add arnauts since pashalik of scutari didnt pariticped diriect but arnauts did Pravoslavac(yt) (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You could put "Albanian volunteers" if the Pashalik of Scutari didnt participate directly. Peja mapping (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sure Pravoslavac(yt) (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Surkis ambush

Hello Peja mapping, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Surkis ambush, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surkis ambush.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Rezalla (1997) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Rezalla (1997) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rezalla (1997) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slatersteven (talk) 16:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Battle of Hajla Pass

Hello Peja mapping, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Battle of Hajla Pass, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Hajla Pass.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]