User talk:Ovedc/Archive 3

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medison Pharma (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are from press release sites such as PRNewswire, Business Wire, News Wire, GlobeNewswire etc. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medison Pharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Medison Pharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 03:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hapak logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Hapak logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yehuda Ullmann (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eternal Shadow were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At times the submission sounds like a advertisement for the subject’s services. Based off of the references it appears the subject fails to meet WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yehuda Ullmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yehuda Ullmann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 02:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of websites

I believe you have overlooked the requirement in WP:PAID to disclose the websites at which you solicit work and advertise services, in your case Wiki-Mentor:

"Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services. If such an account is deleted or removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week.[3] Additionally, paid editors must provide links to the user page(s) of their Wikipedia account(s) on each website on which they advertise, solicit or obtain paid editing services, as well as in direct communications with each client and potential client (such as through email). If the paid editor has used or controlled more than one Wikipedia account, each account must be disclosed.[4]" Fences&Windows 21:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I really didn't know this requirement, Thanks you for pointed it to me - I published it now in my user page. Sorry Ovedc (talk) 03:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jolt (company) (February 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NORG --

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Noam Shalev

Hello, Ovedc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Noam Shalev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Become (company) (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Loksmythe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of material on this page is lacking corresponding references, failing WP:V.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Become (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Become (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Loksmythe (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medison Pharma (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medison Pharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Medison Pharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alon Kaplan

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alon Kaplan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ovedc/Ossi Yeto

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Ovedc/Ossi Yeto, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://staging.mitrelli.com/sectors/energy/ and https://staging.mitrelli.com/projects/gangelas-mini-hydroelectric-power-plant/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Calton | Talk 09:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ovedc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! I think the block was done by mistake:

User Jimfbleak made the block immediately at the same time-signutrue (13:42, 6 June 2021) with another user-block (see: here), maybe without checking my page.
My user name is Ovedc, for 13 productive years at wikipedia, without any problems. It is my Hebrew name: Oved Cohen! And it has no marketing meaning.
I do get paid for some edits, but clearly state it in my user-page and in the Talk-pages, accordingly to Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Some drafts are in my user-space and not meant to be shown, only for temporary reasons, until moving them to the main space.
Of course, if I made any mistake, unintentionally, please let me know, and I will immediately correct it and learn from it, to the future.
I contributed more then 300,000 edits to Wikipedia (mainly in the Hebrew Wikipedia) and when I will be unblocked, I will continue with useful contributions, according to the procedures.

I am asking you to un-block my user, please. Thanks - Ovedc (talk) 11:43, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per Amire80 below. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 00:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Are you able to take a look at this, please? ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 03:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:

I do get paid for some edits... Some? I counted 42 paid declarations on your user page.
Some drafts are in my user-space and not meant to be shown But that can be seen, including the nakedly promotional material you copied-and-pasted from a company website -- a clear copyright violation.
I also don't see the company name or representative of your copyright violation on your list of paid declarations on your user page. Are there others? Have you declared everything? --Calton | Talk 04:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Calton, Thank you for your reply, I appreciate that! I didn't know that the Paid-contribution disclosure is mandatory on drafts that are in my user-space and not publish as articles, also about copying from their website. I always remove copyright violation from drafts before moving the article to the main space and declare COI! It is consider right at the Hebrew Wikipedia! If it is wrong here, I will ask to remove them and apologize for that and will not do it again. Please let me know, and I will remove all violations from my drafts. Thanks - Ovedc (talk) 04:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that the Paid-contribution disclosure is mandatory on drafts....

You're being paid to edit on behalf of a client, and it makes no difference whether you're doing so in Main space, Draft space, or any other space on Wikipedia. This is not even slightly difficult.

I always remove copyright violation from drafts before moving the article...

You shouldn't have had copyright violations in drafts or anywhere else in the first place, and fiddling with copied material isn't how it's done.

I contributed more then [sic] 300,000 edits to Wikipedia (mainly in the Hebrew Wikipedia)'

Correction: ALMOST ALL of your edits are to Hebrew Wikipedia: 316,513 out of a total 318,171, with 1,472 here. What you do on Hebrew Wikipedia is irrelevant; what you do on English Wikipedia is what counts. --Calton | Talk 05:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calton, thanks. Ovedc, you didn't declare this COI as required, and looking at your user page, you can hardly claim ignorance. Since I blocked you, I'll leave it to an uninvolved admin to consider your block Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! As I said, I really didn't know that the procedures apply to the user-space. If I would have known, I wouldn't do this. I did this with no intension to do any harm. Please let me correct this, and I will not do it again. I will be very thankful if you will delete my user-drafts, as follow, and let me continue to make useful contributions.

Please delete these drafts at my user space: , [[User:Ovedc/Agricultiva]] , [[User:Ovedc/Albert Rubin]] , [[User:Ovedc/Alon Korngreen]] , [[User:Ovedc/aMoon]] , [[User:Ovedc/Amos Gilhar]] , [[User:Ovedc/Become]] , [[User:Ovedc/Elie Wurtman]] , [[User:Ovedc/Eyal Boers]] , [[User:Ovedc/Focus Education]] , [[User:Ovedc/Kora]] , [[User:Ovedc/Lesley Sachs]] , [[User:Ovedc/Medison Pharma]] , [[User:Ovedc/Mine]] , [[User:Ovedc/Ofer Bengal]] , [[User:Ovedc/Owini]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox2]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox3]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox4]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox5]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox6]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox7]] , [[User:Ovedc/sandbox8]] , [[User:Ovedc/Shalem College]] , [[User:Ovedc/Talya Miron-Shatz]] , [[User:Ovedc/Technion Faculty of Architecture]] , [[User:Ovedc/Yehuda Ullmann]] , [[User:Ovedc/Tzahi Malach]]

Thanks- Ovedc (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I won't do the unblocking myself, because Oved is my friend in real life and I guess it's a bit of a COI.

That said, having known Oved online and offline for more than ten years, I am quite certain that his intentions were good and that it was an unintentional policy violation.

I recommend unblocking. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ovedc/Geodata

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Ovedc/Geodata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gis-geodata.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Calton | Talk 05:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Swapping out "it" for "we" doesn't disguise the copying, especially when you don't adjust the grammar ("It utilize state-of-the-art..."). --Calton | Talk 05:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TASC Consulting & Capital

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TASC Consulting & Capital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Technion Faculty of Architecture

Hello. Is the above paid editing?--- Possibly (talk) 04:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, --- Possibly, it is, sorry for the delay, my mother called me, before I managed to complete the COI as required, I done it by now. Ovedc (talk) 05:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ofer Bengal (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The problem is both notability and NPOV. As for notability, There is no sure sign that his weapons work is notable, besides the awards, and they could have been routine. There's no real proof he was the lead designer or developer. As for his commercial activities, there's no real notability for Tiltan, his toys, Mobil, or Edge. That leaves RiT. and Regis. RIT has an article. It does not meet NCORP, and should be nominated for deletion. Redis and Redis Labs both have articles. There's no basis for two articles: The company is known almost entirely for this product. so the merged single article should be for the product, . Redis Labs, might meets NCORP, but most of the source are mere notices or PR interviews and must be removed. The article is also in large part promotional , and would do as PR for them, so it must be made encyclopedic. Redis is notable. There's excessive detail, in my opinion, but other software articles also have a good deal of detail. And many of the sources are product specifications from the company , or mere notices or PR interviews and should at least be decreased. The question then is whether he is sufficiently notable in his own right as the CEO of that firm. He didn't develop the product. Based on reading the patents, hed id develop some parts of the system.

He founded a company that bought it. I think that gives him a very marginal notability.

As for NPOV Being a member of a company's board is insignificant. And the ifnormation about REDIS doesnt belong in this article. The photo with Google's CEO is unnecessary, and promotional.

I think this would be deleted in main space, if I approved it in its present form. Try to focus on the main notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ofer Bengal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ofer Bengal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yair Schindel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yair Schindel. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yair Schindel (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yair Schindel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yair Schindel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 03:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AMoon (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The topic is definitly notable, the sources are good, but some parts of the article are written without a neutral point of view.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AMoon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AMoon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 02:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mine (company) (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I've provided a more detailed source assessment on the draft's talk page. Stronger sources are needed to establish notabilty.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mine (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mine (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benzion Fuchs (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You used mostly primary sources, like his page on the Tel Aviv University website. You must use reliable, secondary sources to prove notability. For now, this fails WP:PROF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benzion Fuchs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benzion Fuchs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 12:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talya Miron-Shatz (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

Tagged with cn, but seems issue is still present. Either remove unsourced or poorly sourced material or cite with reliable sources before it is accepted. See biography of living people. Atleast, 1 third-party source is needed as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Talya Miron-Shatz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Talya Miron-Shatz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 02:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ovedc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 02:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elie Wurtman (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Trivial mentions, primary sources and other ORG websites showing his profile are not sufficient to justify notability. According to GNG, A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Sources with passing mentions do not satisfy GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elie Wurtman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elie Wurtman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI on Birthright. Please consider making edit requests on the talk page instead of directly editing the article

Hello, Ovedc. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Birthright Israel, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Freelance-frank (talk) 02:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are generic recommendations above. Thank you for making your COI clear. Please consider the other suggestions as well. Freelance-frank (talk) 02:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Thank you, Freelance-frank, I will comply with those recommendations! Ovedc (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adcore has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adcore. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adcore (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheWikiholic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many sources are non-WP:RS or are press releases published in otherwise RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adcore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adcore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheWikiholic (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amos Gilhar

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amos Gilhar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Become (company)

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Become (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jolt (company)

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jolt (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yehuda Ullmann

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yehuda Ullmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Medison Pharma

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Medison Pharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yair Schindel

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yair Schindel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AMoon

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AMoon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mine (company)

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mine (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Benzion Fuchs

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benzion Fuchs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elie Wurtman

Hello, Ovedc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elie Wurtman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]