User talk:Mr. Neutron/Archive

Welcome!

Hello, Mr. Neutron, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Ploutarchos 15:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock template

You can remove it now - you were cleared.--Ploutarchos 15:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illyrians

You've jumped into a edit dispute without contributing to the ongoing discussion. Please read , WP:CON, WP:NPOVD, and WP:DR and contribute to the discussion before making further edits. Thanks. --Ronz 15:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey

When you reverted my "deletion", you also reverted all my other edits. Why not just change the stuff u want. Uuttyyrreess 20:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Ok sorry I forget. And you sign yourself :) Mr. Neutron 03:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello, how are you doing??? Are you Albanian? Mirë se vini!!! --Noah30 22:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonia edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Macedonia and Pirin Macedonia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Chaser - T 22:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the "source"

Regarding I Hear the Woods Rustling, the link to some text file you provided is not a proper source of any kind. Please provide a decent source (in this case, it should be related to ethnomusicology). See WP:REF Ugzdaveam 17:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has the text of the song in Bulgarian and it testifies for its usage. Mr. Neutron 17:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Mr. Neutron...

...but, I will not give up. You can start revert war, but in the end you will have to prove on the relevant talk pages that term Macedonian Empire was not used for the state of Samuil and since you cannot prove that you already lost your revert war. Have a nice day... PANONIAN 19:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Proving?" Have you even read Samuil of Bulgaria and its references? The region is far from Macedonia and Macedonia language is anachronism. Mr. Neutron 19:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics of Albania

You wrote: there are differences between Vlachs, Aromanians. I really doubt it. Bring me sources. You wrote that Serbians an Montenegrins are not the same people in Albania. So, you don't know wher this people live. I will tell you: they live in the northern part of the country, around Shköder. See this: The remaining population was mostly of Slavic origin with some Gypsies (Roma). Map 5 shows the distribution of the ethnic minorities within Albania in 1918. The highest percentages were in the eastern districts bordering to nowadays Serbia (Kosovo) and Macedonia, where the Slavic minority lived. There were also Slavic minorities in the cities and in the region around Shkodra, where people of Montenegrin descent lived. Source: http://www-gewi.kfunigraz.ac.at/suedost/seiner/marriage_patterns.html

See here where the Aromanians (vlachs) lived in Albania: http://www.farsarotul.org/nl22_2.htm

I hope, you understand now.--Olahus 19:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP вандалче

Понеже ти си по-запознат с нещата ще докладваш ли за случая по статията за Лазар Колишевски - явно е, че този с IP-то сега си е направил регистрация и прави абсолютно същото каквото и преди. Ясно ми е какъв е и защо го прави, то няма смисъл от коментиране.

Misirkov

Here's the problem: The two sections that follow clearly state that the FYROM side considers KM to have flip-flopped from the issue; while the Bulgarian side claims that his writings are consistent with only one opinion.

What I wrote simply summarizes the rest of the article, as is typical in opening paragraphs. I have no objections to your wording, per se, but, if you feel that it is accurate, then you should update the two sections below to be consistent with it (providing references, of course). As it stands, the article is self-conflicting. Regards, sys < in 21:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see the problem.Mr. Neutron 21:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

За учителстването на Гоце Делчев в Щип

и по-точно за този

документ. Вчети се в него и ще видиш, че подписът на Делчев не стои в графата "Български език", която е втора отгоре надолу, а е поставен срещу други предмети на последния и третия отдолу нагоре редове. Между другото, намирам включването на това екзархийско свидетелство за лишено от връзка с въпроса за етническата принадлежност на революционера. Приеми поздравите ми! - Jackanapes 15:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

За "Таjните на Македониjа". Това не е сериозен библиотечен, научен или архивен сайт. Става дума за елементарно изработена патриотична пропаганда. Конкретните предполагаеми думи на Делчев са изписани без посочване на сериозен източник - архив или научна публикация. Подобна съмнителна информация може най-вече да компрометира сериозността на българската гледна точка, а тя е достатъчно силна и без изсилвания. - Jackanapes 16:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian hip hop

Why do you keep moving Macedonian hip hop to Hip hop of the Republic of Macedonia? The article does not limit hip hop music music to the Republic of Macedonia. "Macedonian" refers to the Macedonian language not the Republic of Macedonia. For example: German rap does not limit hip hop to Germany, which is why it is not called Hip hop of Germany. How would you identify German hip hop artists in countries other than Germany? If you can not provide a legitimate reason for moving the page, then don't move it or you will be reported for violation of WP:NPOV. Frightner 18:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Macedonia" needs a disambiguation, so does Macedonian, thats why. What is your problem with "Republic of Macedonia"? Btw, the only "neutral" way is to disambiguate the country/region name whenever possible. "Macedonian language hip hop" is fine with me. Mr. Neutron 18:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Macedonians (ethnic group)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Perspicacite 02:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a false result. Anyone can close a 3RR report. You have engaged in what is clearly vandalism. Continue and you will be blocked. Perspicacite 02:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong. Its the "Administrators notice board" and the admins deal with this. Actually your actions are vandalism since you are messing up the page and obstructing the arbitration process. Mr. Neutron 02:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts at WP:AN/3RR

Disrupting WP:AN/3RR with multiple reverts is a nuisance. If you have a problem with someone's assessment of the situation, don't repeatedly revert them, ask them to stop and if they don't, consider reporting them to WP:ANI. That page is used by a lot of editors to report important 3RR violations, and the last thing they need is an edit conflict. --Deskana (talk) 02:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is obviously a problem since this is the Administrators notice board after all. The page was not under heavy editing at the time. Mr. Neutron 02:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting excessively accomplishes nothing... which ironically is the whole point of the board. --Deskana (talk) 02:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand this, and I reported him to the vandalism intervention board after the his second revert. Mr. Neutron 02:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Scientific and Literary Society

Would you be kind to tell me why do you think that the following is POW, and not facts?

It published the first book in a modern Macedonian literary language (Za Makedonskite Raboti - On Macedonian Matters) in 1903. In 1905 it published Vardar, the first scholarly, scientific and literary journal in that language, while in 1913 it produced the first map of Macedonia.

Do I have to remind you that if you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia? (Zdravko mk 18:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Block for 3RR

In relation to this 3RR report, I've blocked you for 24 hours. You can see my reasoning at the 3RR page. Bucketsofg 21:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is unfair, as user:Frightner has committed exactly the same number of reverts on Macedonian hip hop, and he actually started the revert-war. In all fairness, I suggest equal treatment. Mr. Neutron 21:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunate

The whole dispute over the 3RR page was unfortunate. I saw your post on one of the other users' talkpages and I see now I misinterpreted that edit as vandalism. What is really a shame is that if others had not interfered we probably would have resolved the whole issue within minutes. Ironically I closed the report that later got you blocked as "no violation" but an administrator disagreed. Sorry. Perspicacite 07:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad you understand it now. No harm done. Mr. Neutron 14:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Strich3d and User:Amacos

Някаква идея къде да съобщя за тях. Дори и да не са "сокчета" със сигурност нарушават правилата на Уикипедия като връщат страницата на първия до положението, което обижда не само мен и теб, но и всички потребители от България и Гърция. Виждам, че са ти спрели правата за 24 часа, така че ако искаш пиши тук, пък аз ще следя страницата. Благодаря предварително. --Laveol ^T 13:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

email? Mr. Neutron 17:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Report withdrawn

I have withdrawn the report against the IP contributor. I suggest now that the contents of National Liberation War of Macedonia is improved to meet Wikipedia quality standards rather than adding more criteria which may cause more conflict. Any further contributions should be discussed first on the talk page. Frightner 14:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will take formal steps for resolution. Mr. Neutron 14:50, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atanas Badev

I have temporarily blocked you for edit warring on Atanas Badev. Please discuss disputes on the talk page and reach a consensus before editing the page. --Tango 16:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing licensing information from image description pages

Hello, Mr. Neutron. It has been brought to my attention that you have been removing licensing information from image description pages (in particular, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], and [17]). Often you provide no justification for this removal. If you believe that an image is incorrectly tagged with a free license tag, the proper procedure is to follow the three instructions at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. Please let me know if you need help or have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 18:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You got told. Frightner 12:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to National Liberation War of Macedonia

Неутроне, заключиха заради анонимни Фироми Uhrana и National Liberation War of Macedonia в неприятна ситуация! Ако можеш да направиш нещо ще съм ти благодарен !Jingby 16:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting for now and things will be fine. Mr. Neutron 20:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation needed

Excuse me, but what do you want to say? Could you explain me? I really don't understand your logic. - Jackanapes 18:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is undisputable tradition of the name "Pirin Macedonia" among Bulgarians, see for example Ivan Mihailov's "Memoirs", volume 4, chapter 4, named "The situation in Pirin Macedonia". If some Greek "patriot" is irritated from that historical fact - I don't care. - Jackanapes 18:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have anything against your sources, just dont question the knowledge of others on the topic. "Please, don't edit Bulgarian topics that you don't know." Mr. Neutron 18:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The formula "Pirin Macedonia and irredentist allegations" sounds ok. See Talk page on Blagoevgrad Province for more examples for usage of Pirin Macedonia in Bulgaria. Best wishes! - Jackanapes 18:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm glad this is worked out. Also please read Wikipedia:AGF. Mr. Neutron 18:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith in that case? Sorry, but Politis is a vandal. The same problem was explained to him already with the same arguments, but obviously he don't want to get that there are many Macedonias, not only the Greek one. - Jackanapes 18:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a good practice to call someone a vandal, just because you have a content dispute with him. I am sure things can be worked out in small steps (no major reverts). Mr. Neutron 18:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IPs

There is another list of IP addresses where I started adding Frighner's IPs about 2 weeks ago. However, this list has considerable backlog: Wikipedia:Abuse_reports#203.59.82.217 as they have not yet implemented bot. 203.59.82.217
203.166.228.19
203.59.190.141
124.168.73.225
203.217.2.246
203.59.100.155
203.59.190.29
124.168.106.129
124.168.101.42
203.59.65.185

History of the Macedonian language

Edit War!!! Jingby 18:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"(undo edits of banned user:Frightner)"

I'd like to ask that you don't do this for a few days. Certainly feel free to edit articles, including changing things that anyone has changed that you think you can improve, including Frightner, but please don't automatically revert constructive edits he made. It is true that technically Wikipedia:Banning policy#Enforcement by reverting edits says that you can, but I'd like to ask that you not. You see, the first policy of the encyclopedia, is If a rule prevents you from working with others to improve or maintain Wikipedia, ignore it. For several days now, Frightner has been doing that, working with others to improve or maintain, making constructive contributions and discussion, sometimes in the face of rather heated edits, and I'd like to ask that he be given more credit for that. He's "banned", not by arbcom decision or by the community, or by the dispute resolution process, but because he was blocked by an administrator, and no other administrator has unblocked yet. He did do some nasty stuff as the reason for that indefinite block, so I'd personally like to see a few more days of reasonably peaceful discussion and constructive edits before unblocking as a sign of good faith, but as a sign of partial good faith, I'd like to give him the chance to make those edits without having them reverted just on principle. If he starts making personal attacks or vandalizing, certainly drop a note on my talk page, and we can go back to reversion on principle, but let's give him a chance. OK? Thanks for your consideration. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Edits like this or this are not acceptable. I've given up any idea of unblocking Frightner. If it makes it easier for you to undo all his edits, go ahead. :-(. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]