Jump to content

User talk:MeetSingh316

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2025

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Sri Charitropakhyan appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. mwwv converseedits 23:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many does not believe this viewpoint. I am just simply stating this is not correct info. Unless everyone is on board with no one has the right to attach Guru saab name. MeetSingh316 (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t have any objections, so I’m not adding anything wrong here. I’m simply suggesting that both believers and non-believers of this text can obtain unbiased information. This is a fundamental right of every individual! MeetSingh316 (talk) 23:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sri Charitropakhyan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. mwwv converseedits 00:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand how can you even add this. This is pure misinformation. MeetSingh316 (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am gonna file a case and lodge a case to wiki for misinformation. This is everyone rights. MeetSingh316 (talk) 00:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Sri Charitropakhyan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geoff | Who, me? 00:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a dispute and this page is spreading mis-information. MeetSingh316 (talk) 00:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On this page Dasam Granth... it is clearly mentiond author name disputed... This is utter misinformation. MeetSingh316 (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:MeetSingh316. Thank you. mwwv converseedits 01:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 01:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MeetSingh316 (talk) 03:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]