User talk:Kdaly100

GAA player infoboxes

From your user page Learn how to do those bloody infoboxes for GAA players :-O What problems are you having maybe i can help (Gnevin 16:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

thanks - its the shirt colors - I know all the RGB stuff and I suppose if I sat down on the sandbox for half an hour I would work it out. Also do you think every GAA player should have a player infobox as in some (most) case the depth of information is not great until they actually produce an autobigraphy/biography.

Yes they all should have the either {{infobox GAA player}} or {{infobox GAA dualplayer}}. As for lack of infomation i agree certain infomation such as scores apps are hard to come by but even without this the infobox allows unfamiliar person a quick overview of the player .

As for the shirt colour it is very hit and miss but Web colours can be useful (Gnevin 17:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

ps Template_talk:Infobox_GAA_player and Template_talk:Infobox_GAA_dualplayer both give an overview of usage (Gnevin 17:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks - I have given Larry Tompkins the treatment.... BustOut 21:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Will plug away with a many GAA players as I can possibly sufficient information on.[reply]

Billy Morgan

Hi. I'm glad that you liked the changes I made to the Billy Morgan article. Been meaning to get around to it for a while. The reason you can't see the history section is because I redirected the whole article from Billy Morgan (footballer) to Billy Morgan (Gaelic footballer). There's already an article about another Billy Morgan who was a footballer in England in the early 1900s I think. CorkMan 11:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete

A tag has been placed on Canon Michael O'Brien, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Useless article with no encyclopedic content, bad spelling and grammar.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dreamy ^\*/_!$! 14:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy

Hi. When you tag articles for speedy deletion, please do not remove the content or move it to the talk page. The content should be left in place. Cheers TigerShark 23:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dundee and Arbroath Railway

Hi - I have done some work on Dundee and Arbroath Railway over the past few days and thought that you (I spotted your name associated with this type of work) might be interested in looking and doing some edits on it. --BustOut 14:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had a quick look this evening, this is a great start. I have applied the layout I have used for others. The main item that will need adding is the route map template. I will think about this over the next few days. OTher bits will have to wait until I return from a business trip and can look at my reference books. --Stewart^(talk) 19:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Casey Hughes and Maddie Coleman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Casey Hughes and Maddie Coleman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Hughes and Maddie Coleman. Thank you. Carlossuarez46 21:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Kimberlin Notability

This is the first post I have created and it has been updated to be better aligned with wiki notability standards. Can you please advise if the standards have been met in your eyes?

--Seyoda 18:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please don't remove the notability tag just yet for the following reasons. I have put it back but also a stub tag (not sure if that is OK but it covers both bases). The tag isn't bad as such it just looks for help. I have also made what I think are some helpful edits to start you along your way.

You should at least add some external links to validate the topic you have written.
As you were the original author you could be Kevin Kimberlin (grin) so it is best to leave the tag there so other Wikipedians can help out and perhaps enhance the article
Have a look at other articles on people to get some ideas as to what a good

Good Luck !!! BustOut 18:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cliff Richard Always Guaranteed.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cliff Richard Always Guaranteed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roger Charlton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roger Charlton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Andrew Mill (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maurizio Valtieri

Hello, Kdaly100. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality. I'm dropping you a note to let you know that I have removed the speedy deletion template that you placed on Maurizio Valtieri because the tag does not fit the speedy deletion criteria. While articles in other languages may be subject to speedy deletion if they are copies of articles from the Wiki in that foreign language (see WP:CSD#A2), otherwise they are tagged for translation by placing {{notenglish}} on them and following the template's instructions to list them at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English. The volunteers there help us to determine if the contents meet guidelines.

As a general note, I noticed that when you placed the deletion tag on this article and on the now deleted Tyler McGaughey, you did not warn the article's creators. The deletion templates expand on the pages to include a section to be pasted on the creator's page. This lets the creator know why his or her article has been deleted and may help them to avoid creating inappropriate pages in the future. Please take an extra minute or two when templating pages for deletion to copy that notice onto the creator page. Thank you, and thanks again for keeping an eye out on article quality. If you'd like to talk about this, feel free to contact me at my page. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lights.Action!(band)

A tag has been placed on Lights.Action!(band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maxdixon

Per your request and my annoyance, I've reported them to administrators. He should dealt with rather soon. Ɔrassic ^(talk) 15:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite a City fan. :P I'm actually a Latics fan helping out with all clubs on wiki. But in any case, it's no bother. If you need any future help or question, feel free to contact me. Ɔrassic ^(talk) 15:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pthizzle415

An administrator has issued an only warning to the person to stop their vandalizing on your page so If he tries it again he will be blocked indef., here on the wiki we dont tolerate personal attacks like that. Whenever you see vandalism happening, go through the warnings on this page and if they dont stop after a final warning report them to here Thanks, all the best Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 10:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just been blocked. Now you are free to enjoy your wiki experience:) Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 10:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Escott

Yup, saw it, but thanks for the heads up :). The guy has got a dozen vandalism reversions to his name and only a few warnings; I gave him a final warning because nobody with enough braincells to actually use a keyboard can fail to see that your pages being deleted=your pages probably not being very useful. Ironho lds 11:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :). Ahh, he's been indef blocked. Did you ARV him or was it someone else? Ironho lds 11:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your userpage says you don't have anything particular to do at the moment; may I suggest missing animal pages? I've done maybe 20 of the things, without actually knowing anything about the animals involved. There's a link on my "notes" page to the standard taxonomy textbook, which the creators were kind enough to upload to the interweb. There's info on every mammal discovered pre-2005 at the moment; I find it's a good way to contribute helpfully and occupy time :). Ironho lds 11:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I only have just started back in to Wiki recently and I couldn't see your animals link - does that mean you have done every single one LOLBustOut (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HTAFC23 Spamming

Hi HTAFC23 is spamming articles at the moment t- can they please be blocked ASAP as even with Twinkle I can't keep up --BustOut' (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im a Rollbacker, not an Admin. Judging from WP:AIAV logs, It seems that he/she is already blocked by User:Rettetast one minute after the initial report :) Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 14:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blueberry yum yum (plant)

In accordance with WP:BB I created this page. I was not sure if it would be a legitimate content page or not. However, after the proposal for speedy deletion I see that does comply with the guidelines for speedy deletion. Therefore, I have turned it into a redirect to Marijuana of which Bluebery yum yum is a subspecies (as has been done to the subspecies purple cush, purple haze, etc.). Thank you for your time, Ζρς ι'β' ^¡hábleme! 22:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I will try to incorporate it into the main article then. :) Thank you, Ζρς ι'β' ^¡hábleme! 22:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Bands

Thanks very much for the help with the page - I really appreciate it. The band does have an album coming out soon so hopefully the page won't be deleted before then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilmainham61 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC) --Kilmainham61 (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Gayreece

At first i was like you, but a search revealed this word actually exists and might be common, im not of Greek origin so im not sure what people of this nationality think but whatever happens to the article i will be happy about it. Its probably slang like yanks referring to Americans. Cheers Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 10:19, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello, I am new to the wikipedia community and would like to make an article about a dentist I respect greatly. Initially, I just copied and pasted information from his website because it seemed like the easiest most sensible thing to do. However, everytime I put something (and delete more and more for that matter) my page keeps getting deleted. What can I do so these people will stop deleting my page and I can still write a BIO about this wonderful man. Thank youi for your time and consideration.

Doctrbob1

(Doctrbob1 (talk) 16:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Kaspar Glatz

You started editing my article before I had time to complete it. Now it is done. Can you remove the cleanup needed tag? I don't seem to be able to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob Caldwell CSL (talk • contribs) 16:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - --BustOut (talk) 07:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kaspar Glatz

Thaks for removing the tag. This was my first article and you taught me something: There are people out there ready to ounce on new articles for fixing. In the future I will use the Sandbox feature, rather than posting a draft. Some of your corrections also helped me learn the formatting. Thanks again.Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coghlan

Hi there! I noticed your comment on the talk page of Eamonn Coghlan and just wanted to ask your opinion on the improvements I've made. I still think there's much room to improve the article but there's a very good starting point now! If you want to improve the article further, then you could do worse than use Zersenay Tadese as a good example. Cheers! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Join WikiProject Athletics!} 20:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Kdaly100! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Niall Cahalane - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Buffalo Mailer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brendan Daly (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brendan Daly (footballer)

The article Brendan Daly (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and completely orphaned BLP. After a quick search, it is unclear if he ever even played competitively for Cork, and in any case the article does not come close to an assertion of general notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --W F C-- 20:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Up To The Roof

The article Up To The Roof has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MOVIE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 14:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please Advise

I need your help

How do get the new article I created to show the Blue Info Box at the top labled "Contents"

Thanks--Woogie10w (talk) 15:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but the matter is resolved.--Woogie10w (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good - sorry but I do not visit WP as often as I used to :-) BustOut (talk) 16:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

several topics

hello,

where i can get this russian handbook of losses and also in a english version?

why you not show all losses of spain, switzerland, etc. in the list, with a hint or info that they are losses with the german, russian, etc., army? it were spanish or estonian people...

do you add more countries to the list?

and this handbook listed also the losses of ww2 colonies? do you add that losses also to the ww2 list like in the ww1 list?

regards

KnowledgeIsPower (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ivan Wingreen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Western Province

Robert Symms (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Augusta

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Emily Berrington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kings College and The Look of Love

John Langton Sanford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Unitarian

William Olvis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 29th Street

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello Kdaly100. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Pontianak Harum Sundal Malam II. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe _talk 15:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KH-1. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Web design, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. KH-1 (talk) 01:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Kdaly100,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kdaly100. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kdaly100. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Kdaly100! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kdaly100, per your WP:PERM request I've re-added this for you. From your contribution history it doesn't look like you ever really used it. Please take time to review Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser and its sub-pages before doing any large amount of editing with AWB. Some of the editing expectations have changed over the years, especially regarding "cosmetic" or "high volume" edits. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 15:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rachid El Morabity

The article Rachid El Morabity has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. L293D (☎ • ✎) 19:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kdaly100. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Khalil Everage moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khalil Everage, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Khalil Everage concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Khalil Everage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Khalil Everage

Hello, Kdaly100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khalil Everage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Snowycats (talk) 17:53, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IntSights

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IntSights requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IntSights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IntSights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntSights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Kdaly100! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pau Capell moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pau Capell, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eiger Ultra Trail moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eiger Ultra Trail, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pau Capell (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pau Capell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 05:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kdaly100! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 05:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eiger Ultra Trail

Hello, Kdaly100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eiger Ultra Trail, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eiger Ultra Trail

Hello, Kdaly100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eiger Ultra Trail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pau Capell

Hello, Kdaly100. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pau Capell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pau Capell

Hello, Kdaly100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pau Capell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]