User talk:Jun-Dai

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 23:44, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)

Gangtok

Please could you review Gangtok again. I've made drastic changes. Nichalp 18:45, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

List of botanists by author abbreviation

Thanks for your comment :) I think that it's important for it to show the name in full, so people can see directly that e.g. Tswet is for Mikhail Tsvet without having to click the link (or hold their mouse over it). I'd love to do it properly as a table but my only query is whether that will make it a little hard for an editor to add a new name to the list. I didn't know how to do tables before, so will just copy the format over and see what happens. VivaEmilyDavies 19:22, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Update: I tried doing that but it was a bit unsuccessful because I couldn't make the columns anywhere near a standard width, some ending up far too thin others too wide! If you could give me a pointer it would be apprecaited :) VivaEmilyDavies 19:40, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Very many thank!! :)

I only expected a tip on how to do that, not to have it done for me! It's a great improvement, thankyou! VivaEmilyDavies 22:18, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Deaths in 2005/January

Sorry, Jun-Dai, but this article is not a candidate for speedy delete. Since it is now in articlespace, it needs to follow the same path any other article would if it is to be deleted. It is not patent nonsense, vandalism, lacking in context, or any of the other speedy criteria, therefore, the only other route is VfD. However, I think it a worthwhile article and will not nominate it myself. Denni ☯ 2005 July 1 22:59 (UTC)

Okay, I see it was a test. While it's certainly more advanced than most test that get speedied, it's still just that, and that is a valid speedy criterion. Done. Denni ☯ 2005 July 1 23:03 (UTC)

Tsubaki Sanjūrō

Please make sure that when you move a page you edit the text too, so that the title and text are consistent. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 7 July 2005 10:00 (UTC)

Again, please don't change typography without checking articles linked to; in this case you turned live into dead links. I've reverted your changes until the relevant articles have themselves been renamed. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 7 July 2005 16:00 (UTC)

Macrons in titles

According to the current agreed upon manual of style, {Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)} Japanese terms are not to use macrons or circumflexes in article titles. Unless a new consensus is made, please refrain from adding macrons (ō, ū) in titles, just to play safe. —Tokek 18:59, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If interested, Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_for_Japan-related_articles#English_Wikipedia_is_now_UTF-8 seems to be the place where there is discussion on this. —Tokek 16:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rōmaji

You moved Romaji to Rōmaji, which I think it is OK. However, you did not fix the redirects to point in the correct direction (and they are many). Would you mind fixing them when you have time? Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov 00:15, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films scope

Hello,

I thought I'd let you know that I've brought up the question of the WikiProject Films' scope in the discussion, mainly because I don't think that the project has scope over Cinematography, or for that matter, filmmakers. The discussion includes a link to an earlier archived discussion wherein the question of filmmakers was already brought up and dismissed as needing its own project. As far as cinematography, in my (possibly biased) opinion, it is clearly a Filmmaking article, and is not directly pertinent to WP Films. The reason being that WP Films was created to standardize and improve the style and quality of articles on individual film titles. In any case, thought you'd like to join in the discussion! Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 22:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New userboxes

Per the terms of the German userbox solution new userboxes should not be created in template space. Please read up on the current practices. That page has instructions on how to properly create userfied userboxes. --Cyde Weys 20:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you on RC patrol and userfied your userbox. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 07:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias Jun-Dai 07:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per the strawpoll, education userboxes are probably going to end up on Template space. For consistency, I propose to move the Bard College UBX to Template, unless you have some major objection. Feel free to do it yourself, or if I don't hear back in a few days, I will take care of it. --NThurston 18:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

!! Jun-Dai 20:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bard mini logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bard mini logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shoah DVD cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shoah DVD cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Meshi_(dvd_cover).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Meshi_(dvd_cover).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwanese cinema

Hello there! Perhaps you could add some artcles on Taiwanese cinematographers, film editors and film producers. You can add a {{CinemaofTaiwan}} template at the bottom of articles.

♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 17:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honduras

Hello, you seem to be part of the dispute with the 2009 Honduran coup d'état/constitutional crisis, please take part in mediation discussions. http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/2009_Honduran_coup_d'état --Conor Fallon (talk) 02:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/2009 Honduran coup.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Mediation Request

Hi there. Someone has mentioned your name as in a dispute at this page and I have volunteered to mediate the case as part of the Mediation Cabal. Please read the "mediator notes" section of the case page for further instructions. Thank you, GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 02:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ethnic Studies Library

The article Ethnic Studies Library has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long unreferenced stub on a library with no significant claim to Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 09:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Piperade/Pipérade

Hi there.

I see from the history of the above-named article that you renamed it from Piperade to Pipérade with an accent. I intend to change it back as there is no reason for an accent. There is no accent on the word in any of the languages of the region where this dish comes from (Basque, Occitan, French, Spanish), and there is no native accent in English.

(A lot of people believe the accent is correct, but a quick Google search shows a much bigger number of hits for the version without the accent.)

I will reverse the article and redirect pages over the next few days.

Páraic Maguire 00:43, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Adaptations of The Magic Flute

Category:Adaptations of The Magic Flute, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bras d'Or Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inland sea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jun-Dai. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jun-Dai~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current Cinema COTW

Template:Current Cinema COTW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Testing mediawiki syntax

This is a bullet.
I disagree with your bullet. Jun-Dai (talk)
- This is a sub-bullet
  I vehemently disagree with your sub-bullet Jun-Dai (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Well, I disagree with your disagreement. Jun-Dai (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Masters of Cinema releases for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Masters of Cinema releases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Masters of Cinema releases until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Foosdfa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Foosdfa, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Junior5a (talk) 22:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jun-Dai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cinema COTW candidate

Template:Cinema COTW candidate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jun-Dai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jun-Dai. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Masters of Cinema releases for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Masters of Cinema releases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Masters of Cinema releases (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 12:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cinema COTW

Template:Cinema COTW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suika (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Suika (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose recent is relative, but that was 18 years ago and I haven't the foggiest what I was thinking at the time :-) Clearly the show never made much of a splash to English-speaking world (else there would have been a lot more content since I created the article in 2006). Nevertheless, thanks for the note, and if I find the time/energy, I'll add something to the draft — there is a fair starting point on the Japanese wikipedia: w:ja:すいか_(テレビドラマ) Jun-Dai (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suika (TV series)

The article Suika (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTELEVISION, lacks any reliable independent secondary sources. Has been tagged as such since October 2009 without any improvements or adequate referencing. Noting IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 01:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

v t e Cinema of Taiwan
Films (A–Z)	Films by year: Pre 1970 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 2020s
Filmmakers	Actors Cinematographers Directors Producers Screenwriters
Organization	Taipei Film Commission Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute
Award	Golden Horse Awards Taipei Film Festival (Taipei Film Awards)
Other	Taiwan New Cinema List of cinemas in Taiwan List of Taiwanese submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film List of highest-grossing films in Taiwan