User talk:Jeffreymiami

This is Jeffreymiami's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheyenne Bryant (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing) in multiple independent secondary sources. Interviews and articles written by Bryant are all primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cheyenne Bryant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeffreymiami! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheyenne Bryant (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As previously stated any interviews or articles written by Bryant are considered primary sources and as such are not independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cheyenne Bryant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheyenne Bryant (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still lacks any reliable independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cheyenne Bryant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheyenne Bryant

The article needs to address the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (people), which essentially requires all information contained within the article to be supported with inline citations referencing reliable <u>independent</u> secondary sources. As I've stated articles written by Bryant or interviews by Bryant are not independent and are considered Wikipedia:PST (primary sources). You need to remove all the primary sources within the draft and replace them with secondary sources. I hope that helps - happy editing. Dan arndt (talk) 06:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you i just did it check it out Jeffreymiami (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheyenne Bryant (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is still based on a series of primary sources, predominantly interviews with Bryant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cheyenne Bryant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheyenne Bryant (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cheyenne Bryant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Baqi:) (talk) 12:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheyenne Bryant (January 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I am sorry, the sources just show no indication of notability at this time.

qcne (talk) 22:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

Hi @Jeffreymiami, thanks for the email.

Unfortunately popularity and influence isn't a criteria for our notability: I need to see at least three sources that are each reliable, independent, secondary to her. That means no interviews, talk show segments. And coverage that goes beyond a passing mention and is in-depth critical analysis, discussion, commentary etc.

From your sources I can't see three which meet those requirements? The majority are interviews so fail that requirement. Let me know if you have any sources that do and I will evaluate. qcne (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey thank you so much i appreciate you, check these out

https://fullertonobserver.com/2023/02/14/naacp-square-sign-unveiled/

https://entertainmentnow.com/teen-mom/coachb-briana-dejesus-ashley-jones-fight/

https://spectrumnews1.com/ca/southern-california/entertainment/2023/01/11/golden-globe-awards-return-with-diversity-reforms-after-boycott

https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/859791-dr-cheyenne-bryant-rips-cam-newton-for-publicly-disrespecting-girlfriend

https://hollywoodunlocked.com/life-coach-and-relationship-expert-dr-cheyenne-bryant-gives-advice-to-2024-heisman-winner-travis-hunter-amid-leanna-lenee-criticism-be-with-your-fiancee-do-what-works-best-for-you/

https://tvovermind.com/dr-cheyenne-bryant/

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/anxiety-rings-help-symptoms_l_61780509e4b0931432105c8b

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/dr-cheyenne-bryant-believes-black-230000701.html

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/dr-cheyenne-bryant-reads-ne-155257770.html

this is about her new show

https://tvnewscheck.com/programming/article/fox-soul-announces-the-premiere-of-truth-talks/

also she was accused of being a lesbien by different outlets and she said it wasnt true on her talk show

help me out thank you for everything Jeffreymiami (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

she was also on a tv show basket ball wives on VH1 Jeffreymiami (talk) 05:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Jeffreymiami, let's go through those sources one by one:

Not much coverage of her other than a quote by her.
An interview, so not independent.
Another interview.
Reporting on an interview.
Reporting on her social media posts, not independent.
Listicle article, so not reliable or significant coverage.
An interview.
An interview.
Reporting on an interview.
Not significant coverage.

If those are the best sources you can find, then I am afraid my rejection still stands: she does not yet meet our notability criteria. qcne (talk) 09:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time. I’m going to reach out to her publicist and forward this message. I really appreciate your patience with me. Jeffreymiami (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can you send samples of what is acceptable i spoke to her publicist she would would like to know, i appreciate you, for taking your time to help Jeffreymiami (talk) 03:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @Jeffreymiami. As I've said, you need at least three sources that are each from a reliable publication AND independent of Cheyenne AND provide significant coverage. None of the examples you gave above meet all three of those criteria. qcne (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok i will talk to her publcist and i will get back to you, thank you, Jeffreymiami (talk) 20:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is very possible, if not probable, that she does not meet our criteria for inclusion and therefore does not merit an article at this time.

I would also recommend reading Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing qcne (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]