Jump to content

User talk:Jahnda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For Sitush - if possible, please email me at joe@jac-it.com for my questions so we dont have to go back and forth like this... this is in regards to content type.. there is another article - http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Smuggler_(production_company) that has a lot of info that links only to videos, but the other member (see below) said i couldnt use that since it wasnt credible enought ( which i dont understand if i link to the companies reel of work they have done... you can see it and hear it ). What can i do? i am not trying to spam, but just wanted to create a list of works that could be located if someone want to find info about it...

      • But the issue is that they need to be verified properly, and most importantly, it needs to be verified independently. IMDB is not much of a source for that; that is, if a name pops up in IMDB that doesn't make the name notable. The article needs verified text, not a list of credits. Drmies (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • In the meantime, another editor has stepped in and has made edits that make the article more compliant with our policies. Some of them specifically to this subject can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). But in general, and most importantly, information needs to be neutral and reliably referenced. If a COI editor (sorry, but that's what you are, given your username...) makes edits that do not conform to those guidelines and appears to be spamming, they might find themselves blocked because of the name issue, and the article may be tagged for a COI permanently. I'm going to remove the tag since, with the recent work by User:Sitush, most of the recent edits are not by you--but that's my judgment call, and other editors may feel differently. I hope all this helps, and I hope you understand that we're not out to get you--we're just interested in improving the encyclopedia, and our reliability relies on readers being able to count (to some extent) on our objectivity. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Jahnda. You have new messages at Sitush's talk page.
Message added 23:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HealthTunes (March 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jahnda! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jahnda (talk) 19:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan, - thank you for reading the HealthTunes page. HealthTunes is a Music non- profit (references are given with official webesites) Would you mind pointing out which facts need different/additional validation - and I will make sure to follow your lead. Thank you Jahnda (talk) 19:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HealthTunes (July 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]